Skip to main content

Disorders of Male External Genitalia: Circumcision

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Guide to Pediatric Urology and Surgery in Clinical Practice

Abstract

The prepuce is apparent prenatally at 8 weeks of gestation as a ridge of thickened epithelium. The prepuce grows forward over the glans to completion by 16 weeks of gestation. Early in gestation there is no separation between the epithelium lining the prepuce and glans. Preputial adhesions are a characteristic of normal development with initiation of spontaneous separation by desquamation late in gestation. The rate of preputial separation after birth is variable with up to 70% of boys having some degree of preputial adherence at 5 years of age. Consequently a “non-retractile foreskin” or more appropriately described “physiologic phimosis” at birth is normal. The majority of boys will have a fully and easily retractable foreskin by physical maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Elder JS. Abnormalities of the genitalia in boys and their surgical management. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, et al., eds. Campbell’s Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2006:3747-3749.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hutton K. The prepuce. In: Thomas D, pohlman G, et al., eds. Essentials of Paediatric Urology. London: Informa Healthcare. 2008. 232-245.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schoen EJ et al. The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics. 2000;105:E36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shoemaker C. Circumcision: Risks and benefits. UpToDate; January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  5. To T et al. Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection. Lancet. 1998;352:1813-1816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tobian AA et al. Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1298-1309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warner TE et al. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection among heterosexual African American men attending Baltimore sexually transmitted disease clinics. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:59-65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weismiller D. Procedures for neonatal circumcision. UpToDate; January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiswell TE, Enzenauer RW, Holton ME, et al. Declining frequency of circumcision: implications for changes in the absolute incidence and male to female sex ratio of urinary tract infections in early infancy. Pediatrics. 1987;79:338-342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics. 1989;83:1011-1015.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pohlman, G., Wilcox, D. (2010). Disorders of Male External Genitalia: Circumcision . In: Godbole, P., Koyle, M., Wilcox, D. (eds) Guide to Pediatric Urology and Surgery in Clinical Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-366-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-366-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-365-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-366-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics