Abstract
In this chapter, we characterize the impact of product global performance on the choice of product architecture during the product development process. We classify product architectures into three categories: modular, hybrid, and integral. Existing research shows that the choice of product architecture during the new product development is a crucially strategic decision for a manufacturing firm. However, no single architecture is optimal in all cases; thus, analytic models are required to identify and discuss specific trade-offs associated with the choice of the optimal architecture under different circumstance. This chapter develops analytic models whose objectives are obtaining global performance of product through a modular/hybrid/integral architecture. Trade-offs between costs and expected benefits from different product architectures are analyzed and compared. Multifunction products and small size are used as examples to formalize the models and show the impact of the global performance characteristics. We also investigate how optimal architecture changes in response to the exogenous costs of system integrators. Some empirical implications obtained from this study show that if one considers global performance, modular architecture is an absolutely suboptimal decision and integral architecture is an all-the-time candidate for optimal architecture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander C (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Benjaafar S, Sheikhzadeh M, Gupta D (1998) Machine sharing in manufacturing systems: total flexibility versus chaining. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 10:351–378
Brusco MJ, Johns TR (1998) Staffing a multiskilled workforce with varying levels of productivity: an analysis of cross-training policies. Decis Sci 29:499–515
Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product development performance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Desai P, Kekre S, Radhakrishnan S, Srinivasan K (2001) Product differentiation and commonality in design: balancing revenue and cost drivers. Manage Sci 47:37–51
Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2004) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Manage Sci 50:159–173
Fine CH, Golany B, Naseraldin H (2005) Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach. J Oper Manage 23:389–403
Fixson SK (2005) Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions. J Oper Manage 23:345–369
Fujimoto T (1999) The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. Oxford University Press, New York
Fujimoto T (2004) Manufacturing philosophy. Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, Tokyo
Gourville JT, Soman D (2005) Overchoice and assortment type: when and why variety backfires. Market Sci 24:382–395
Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J Market 54:3–19
Griffin A, Hauser JR (1996) Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. J Prod Innov Manage 13:191–215
Hoch SJ, Bradlow ET, Wansink B (1999) The variety of an assortment. Market Science, 18:527–546
Hopp WJ, Van Oyen MP (2004) Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination. IIE Trans 36:919–940
Hopp WJ, Xu X (2005) Product line selection and pricing with modularity in design. Manuf Service Oper Manage 7:172–187
Hyer NL, Brown KA (1999) The discipline of real cells. J Oper Manage 17:557–574
Jiao J, Simpson TW, Siddique Z (2007) Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the art review. J Int Manuf 18(1):5–29
Kim K, Chhajed D (2000) Commonality in product design: cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. Eur J Oper Res 125:602–621
Liker JK (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, New York
Lin J, Chai KH, Wong YS, Brombacher AC (2008) A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development. Eur J Oper Res 185:378–392
Mikkola JH (2006) Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. J Prod Innov Manage 23:128–146
Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Market Sci 26:101–117
Nonaka I (1990) Redundant, overlapping organizations: a Japanese approach to managing the innovation process. California Manage Rev 32:27–38
Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Rev November-December:96–104
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York
Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity, New York
Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, London
Ramachandran K, Krishnan V (2008) Design architecture and introduction timing for rapidly improving industrial products. Manuf Service Oper Manage 10:149–171
Ramdas K (2003) Managing product variety: an integrative review and research directions. Product Oper Manage 12:79–101
Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: implications for exploration. Manage Sci 53:1068–1085
Sanchez R (1999) Modular architectures in the marketing process. J Market 63:92–111
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Ulrich KT (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firms. Res Policy 24:419–440
Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2004) Product design and development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing product development quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. Free Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yin, Y., Kaku, I., Tang, J., Zhu, J. (2011). Product Architecture and Product Development Process for Global Performance. In: Data Mining. Decision Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-338-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-338-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-337-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-338-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)