Abstract
The debate over whether cancer starts in a single cell (Hahn and Weinberg 2002) or is a multifocal disease (the latter variously referred to as the multicellular model [Attolini and Michor 2009] or field theory [Soto et al. 2008]) has a long history. This book, Breast Cancer: A Lobar Disease, may be a stepping stone toward trying to resolve this long-standing issue. My own work on breast cancer detection has been based on the assumption, at first sight contrary to Tibor Tot’s sick lobe hypothesis, that targeting a single small lesion will halt breast cancer, and the epidemiological evidence would seem to point that way. And yet, as can be seen by the dialogue with Tot and Vincent Vinh-Hung at the end of my chapter (Gordon 2010), more subtle considerations may let us see breast cancer both ways, i.e., that they are not mutually exclusive. It may be that one could either stop breast cancer recurrence for an extended time by ablating a single small tumor, or for the remainder of a women’s life by removing the whole of a sick lobe, difficult outcomes to distinguish. As in the debate over total mastectomy versus lumpectomy (Lerner 2001), both may prove clinically equivalent in terms of prolongation of life. At least, lobectomy is less disfiguring than mastectomy, so passions need not run as high. Much work remains ahead to determine the outcome of this debate, though we will see what we can tease out of retrospective epidemiological data (Vinh-Hung et al. 2010).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamo L, Naveiras O, Wenzel PL, McKinney-Freeman S, Mack PJ, Gracia-Sancho J, Suchy-Dicey A, Yoshimoto M, Lensch MW, Yoder MC, García-Cardeña G, Daley GQ (2009) Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature 459:1131–1135
Attolini CS, Michor F (2009) Evolutionary theory of cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci 1168:23–51
Beloussov LV, Gordon R (2006) Preface. Morphodynamics: bridging the gap between the genome and embryo physics. Int J Dev Biol 50:79–80
Beloussov LV, Opitz JM, Gilbert SF (1997) Life of Alexander G. Gurwitsch and his relevant contribution to the theory of morphogenetic fields. Int J Dev Biol 41:771–779
Björklund NK, Gordon R (1993) Nuclear state splitting: a working model for the mechanochemical coupling of differentiation waves to master genes. Russian J Dev Biol 24:79–95
Björklund NK, Gordon R (1994) Surface contraction and expansion waves correlated with differentiation in axolotl embryos. I. Prolegomenon and differentiation during the plunge through the blastopore, as shown by the fate map. Comput Chem 18:333–345
Björklund NK, Gordon R (2006) A hypothesis linking low folate intake to neural tube defects due to failure of post-translation methylations of the cytoskeleton. Int J Dev Biol 50:135–141
Brodland GW, Gordon R, Scott MJ, Björklund NK, Luchka KB, Martin CC, Matuga C, Globus M, Vethamany-Globus S, Shu D (1994) Furrowing surface contraction wave coincident with primary neural induction in amphibian embryos. J Morphol 219:131–142
Brown CJ, Robinson WP (2000) The causes and consequences of random and non-random X chromosome inactivation in humans. Clin Genet 58:353–363
Buller RE, Sood AK, Lallas T, Buekers T, Skilling JS (1999) Association between nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation and BRCA1 mutation in germline DNA of patients with ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:339–346
Chitnis S, Derom C, Vlietinck R, Derom R, Monteiro J, Gregersen PK (1999) X chromosome-inactivation patterns confirm the late timing of monoamniotic-MZ twinning. Am J Hum Genet 65:570–571
Davidson RG (1964) The Lyon hypothesis. J Pediatr 65:765–775
Ekbom A, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO, Hsieh CC, Lan SJ (1992) Evidence of prenatal influences on breast cancer risk. Lancet 340:1015–1018
Fackelmann KA (1997) The birth of a breast cancer: do adult diseases start in the womb? Sci News 151:108–109
Funayama S, Hikosaka K, Yahara T (1997) Effects of virus infection and growth irradiance on fitness components and photosynthetic properties of Eupatorium makinoi (Compositae). Am J Bot 84:823–829
Funayama-Noguchi S (2001) Ecophysiology of virus-infected plants: a case study of Eupatorium makinoi infected by geminivirus. Plant Biol 3:251–262
Going JJ, Moffat DF (2004) Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions. J Pathol 203:538–544
Gordon R (1999) The hierarchical genome and differentiation waves: novel unification of development, genetics and evolution. World Scientific & Imperial College Press, Singapore/London
Gordon R (2006) Mechanics in embryogenesis and embryonics: prime mover or epiphenomenon? Int J Dev Biol 50:245–253
Gordon R (2009) Google embryo for building quantitative understanding of an embryo as it builds itself: II. Progress towards an embryo surface microscope. Biol Theory 4:396–412
Gordon R (2010) Stop breast cancer now! Imagining imaging pathways towards search, destroy, cure and watchful waiting of premetastasis breast cancer [invited]. In: Tot T (ed) Breast cancer – a lobar disease. Springer, London, pp. 167–203
Gordon R, Björklund NK (1996) How to observe surface contraction waves on axolotl embryos. Int J Dev Biol 40:913–914
Gordon R, Brodland GW (1987) The cytoskeletal mechanics of brain morphogenesis. Cell state splitters cause primary neural induction. Cell Biophys 11:177–238
Gordon R, Westfall JE (2009) Google embryo for building quantitative understanding of an embryo as it builds itself: I. Lessons from Ganymede and Google earth. Biol Theory 4: 390–395
Gordon R, Buckley WR (2010) International Embryo Physics Course – An Effort in Reverse Engineering, http://embryophysics.org/
Hahn WC, Weinberg RA (2002) Modelling the molecular circuitry of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:331–341
Hendrix MJC, Seftor EA, Seftor REB, Kasemeier-Kulesa J, Kulesa PM, Postovit LM (2007) Reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments. Nat Rev Cancer 7:246–255
Hoekenga OA, Muszynski MG, Cone KC (2000) Developmental patterns of chromatin structure and DNA methylation responsible for epigenetic expression of a maize regulatory gene. Genetics 155:1889–1902
Howard B, Ashworth A (2006) Signalling pathways implicated in early mammary gland morphogenesis and breast cancer. PLoS Genet 2(e112):1121–1130
Iida S, Morita Y, Choi JD, Park KI, Hoshino A (2004) Genetics and epigenetics in flower pigmentation associated with transposable elements in morning glories. Adv Biophys 38:141–159
Kalthoff KO (2001) Analysis of biological development. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Columbus
Kasemeier-Kulesa JC, Teddy JM, Postovit LM, Seftor EA, Seftor REB, Hendrix MJC, Kulesa PM (2008) Reprogramming multipotent tumor cells with the embryonic neural crest microenvironment. Dev Dyn 237:2657–2666
Kristiansen M, Helland A, Kristensen GB, Olsen AO, Lønning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Orstavik KH (2003) X chromosome inactivation in cervical cancer patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 146:73–76
Kristiansen M, Knudsen GP, Maguire P, Margolin S, Pedersen J, Lindblom A, Ørstavik KH (2005) High incidence of skewed X chromosome inactivation in young patients with familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer. J Med Genet 42:877–880
Kulesa PM, Kasemeier-Kulesa JC, Teddy JM, Margaryan NV, Seftor EA, Seftor REB, Hendrix MJC (2006) Reprogramming metastatic melanoma cells to assume a neural crest cell-like phenotype in an embryonic microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:3752–3757
Lerner BH (2001) breast cancer wars: hope, fear, and the pursuit of a cure in twentieth-century America. Oxford University Press, New York
Linn F, Heidmann I, Saedler H, Meyer P (1990) Epigenetic changes in the expression of the maize A1 gene in Petunia hybrida: role of numbers of integrated gene copies and state of methylation. Mol Gen Genet 222:329–336
Lopez JI, Mouw JK, Weaver VM (2008) Biomechanical regulation of cell orientation and fate. Oncogene 27:6981–6993
Lose F, Duffy DL, Kay GF, Kedda MA, Spurdle AB (2008) Skewed X chromosome inactivation and breast and ovarian cancer status: evidence for X-linked modifiers of BRCA1. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1519–1529
Lyon MF (1961) Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190:372–373
Lyon MF (2003) The Lyon and the LINE hypothesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 14:313–318
Martin CC, Gordon R (1997) Ultrastructural analysis of the cell state splitter in ectoderm cells differentiating to neural plate and epidermis during gastrulation in embryos of the axolotl Ambystoma mexicanum. Russian J Dev Biol 28:71–80
Mintz B, Illmensee K (1975) Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3585–3589
Monteiro J, Derom C, Vlietinck R, Kohn N, Lesser M, Gregersen PK (1998) Commitment to X inactivation precedes the twinning event in monochorionic MZ twins. Am J Hum Genet 63:339–346
Muers MR, Sharpe JA, Garrick D, Sloane-Stanley J, Nolan PM, Hacker T, Wood WG, Higgs DR, Gibbons RJ (2007) Defining the cause of skewed X-chromosome inactivation in X-linked mental retardation by use of a mouse model. Am J Hum Genet 80:1138–1149
Nishida H (2005) Specification of embryonic axis and mosaic development in ascidians. Dev Dyn 233:1177–1193
Osgood MP (1994) X-chromosome inactivation: the case of the calico cat. Am J Pharm Educ 58:204–205
Pierce GB, Pantazis CG, Caldwell JE, Wells RS (1982) Specificity of the control of tumor formation by the blastocyst. Cancer Res 42:1082–1087
Puck JM, Stewart CC, Nussbaum RL (1992) Maximum-likelihood analysis of human T-cell X chromosome inactivation patterns: normal women versus carriers of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Am J Hum Genet 50:742–748
Raven CP (1966) An outline of development physiology. Pergamon, Oxford
Rossant J (2009) Reprogramming to pluripotency: from frogs to stem cells. Cell 138:1047–1050
Soto AM, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C (2008) Neoplasia as development gone awry: the role of endocrine disruptors. Int J Androl 31:288–293
Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100:64–119
Tenney RM, Discher DE (2009) Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:630–635
Tot T (2011) The theory of the sick lobe. In: Tot T(ed) Breast cancer – a lobar disease. Springer, London, pp. 1–17
Trichopoulos D (1990) Hypothesis: does breast cancer originate in utero? Lancet 335:939–940
TyTy Nursery (2010) Variegated Banana Tree [Musa aeae]: the fast growth of this remarkable variegated plant ironically grows faster than most pure-green leafed banana plants, which is a shocking inconsistency to normally accepted biological principals. http://www.tytyga.com/product/Variegated+Banana+Tree
Vella CM, Robinson R (1999) Robinson’s genetics for cat breeders and veterinarians, 4th edn. Amsterdam, Elsevier Health Sciences
Vermeulen L, Sprick MR, Kemper K, Stassi G, Medema JP (2008) Cancer stem cells–old concepts, new insights. Cell Death Differ 15:947–958
Vickers MA, McLeod E, Spector TD, Wilson IJ (2001) Assessment of mechanism of acquired skewed X inactivation by analysis of twins. Blood 97:1274–1281
Vincent-Salomon A, Ganem-Elbaz C, Manié E, Raynal V, Sastre-Garau X, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Stern MH, Heard E (2007) X inactive-specific transcript RNA coating and genetic instability of the X chromosome in BRCA1 breast tumors. Cancer Res 67:5134–5140
Vinh-Hung V, Tot T, Gordon R (2010) One or many targets? Towards resolving the paradox of single versus multifocal breast cancer from epidemiological data. In preparation
Waddington CH (1934) Morphogenetic fields. Sci Prog (Lond) 29:336–346
Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE (2009) Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the sextracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:75–82
Yu F, Fu A, Aluru M, Park S, Xu Y, Liu H, Liu X, Foudree A, Nambogga M, Rodermel S (2007) Variegation mutants and mechanisms of chloroplast biogenesis. Plant Cell Environ 30:350–365
Zaffari GR, Peres LEP, Kerbauy GB (1998) Endogenous levels of cytokinins, indoleacetic acid, abscisic acid, and pigments in variegated somaclones of micropropagated banana leaves. J Plant Growth Regul 17:59–61
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank William R. Buckley, Stephen A. Krawetz, and Natalie K. Björklund for critical comments and Stephen P. McGrew (New Light Industries, Spokane) and the Organ Imaging Fund of the Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba for support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gordon, R. (2010). Epilogue: The Diseased Breast Lobe in the Context of X-Chromosome Inactivation and Differentiation Waves. In: Tot, T. (eds) Breast Cancer. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-314-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-314-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-313-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-314-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)