Skip to main content

Improved Principal Component Analysis Models for Fault Detection Using Delay Adjustment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
PEM Fuel Cells with Bio-Ethanol Processor Systems

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely and successfully used with process monitoring purposes. However, it has an important drawback as it does not account for time-delays present in data thus causing an inefficient dimensionality reduction of process variables and the subsequent poor monitoring and disturbance detection performance. In this chapter, a new method, the genetic algorithm based delay adjusted PCA (GA-DAPCA), based on genetic algorithm optimization is proposed to improve the PCA performance in the presence of time delays between process signals. The optimization is performed in two loops. The first loop finds the shift between variables that minimize the number of principal components to be considered as common cause variance, the second loop maximizes the variance contained in the previously selected principal component dimensions. The methodology is demonstrated through motivating case studies in the bio-ethanol processor system (see Chap.  9). The obtained results are presented with the same set of faults considered in Chap.  13.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kourti T, Lee J, MacGregor JF (1996) Experiences with industrial applications of projection methods for multivariate statistical process control. Comput Chem Eng 20:S745–S750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miletic I, Quinn S, Dudzic M, Vaculik V, Champagne M (2004) An industrial perspective on implementing on-line applications of multivariate statistics. J Process Control 14:821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Musulin E, Yélamos I, Puigjaner L (2006) Integration of principal component analysis and fuzzy logic systems for comprehensive process fault detection and diagnosis. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(5):1739–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nomikos P, MacGregor JF (1995) Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes. Technometrics 37(1):41–59, February PCA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunia R, Qin SJ, Edgar TF, McAvoy TJ (1996) Identification of faulty sensors using principal component analysis. AIChE J 42:2797–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Musulin E, Bagajewicz M, Nougués JM, Puigjaner L (2004) Design and upgrade of sensor networks for principal components analysis monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:2150–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakshi BR (1998) Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring. AIChE J 44(7):1596–1610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Misra M, Yue HH, Qin SJ, Ling C (2002) Multivariate process monitoring and fault diagnosis by multi-scale PCA. Comput Chem Eng 26:1281–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer MA (1991) NonLinear PCA using autoassociative NN. AIChE J 37(2):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong D, McAvoy J (1996) Nonlinear principal component analysis-based on principal curves and neural networks. Comput Chem Eng 20(1):65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fourie SH, de Vaal P (2000) Advanced process monitoring using an on-line non-linear multiscale principal component analysis methodology. Comput Chem Eng 24:755–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin HD, Lee YH, Lee G, Han C (2006) Robust recursive principal component analysis modeling for adaptive monitoring. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(2):696–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ku W, Storer RH, Georgakis C (1995) Disturance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 30:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wachs A, Lewin DR (1999) Improved PCA methods for process disturbance and failure identification. AIChE J 45(8):1688–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson JE (1991) A user’s guide to principal components. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Himes DM, Storer RH, Georgakis C (1994) Determination of the number of principal components for disturbance detection and isolation. In: Proceedings of the Americal Control Conference, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, June 1994

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addisonwesley, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weiher E, Clarke GDP, Keddy PA (1995) Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, and the coexistence of plant species. J Veg Sci 6:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chipperfield AJ, Fleming PJ (1995) The matlab genetic algorithm toolbox. In: IEE Colloquium on Applied Control Techniques Using MATLAB, 10/1–10/4 Jan 1995

    Google Scholar 

  20. Downs JJ, Vogel EF (1993) A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput Chem Eng 17(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McAvoy TJ, Ye N (1994) Base control problme for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput Chem Eng 18(5):383–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Basualdo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Musulin, E., Basualdo, M. (2012). Improved Principal Component Analysis Models for Fault Detection Using Delay Adjustment. In: Basualdo, M., Feroldi, D., Outbib, R. (eds) PEM Fuel Cells with Bio-Ethanol Processor Systems. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-184-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-184-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-183-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-184-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics