Abstract
This paper details work on the effect of physical context of use on inclusive product interaction. Context of use refers to a set of circumstances which relate to the users, tasks, equipment/tools and environment (both Physical and Social) (ISO, 1998). In particular, the physical context of use refers to factors such as lighting levels, temperature, weather conditions, vibration, noise, the built environment, etc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boyce P (2003) Lighting for the elderly. Technology and Disability, 15(3): 165–180
Clarkson PJ, Coleman R, Hosking I, Waller S (eds.) (2007) Inclusive design toolkit. Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, UK
Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil E (1995) The Purdue pegboard test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disability and Rehabilitation, 17(5): 217–224
Edwards M, Burton A (1959) Correlation of heat output and blood flow in the finger, especially in cold-induced vasodilation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 15(2): 201–208
Elton E, Nicolle C (2009) Now you see it, now you don’t. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Inclusive Design (INCLUDE 2009), Helen Hamlyn Centre, London, UK
Elton E, Nicolle C, Mitchell V (2008) Identifying contextual factors in inclusive design. In: Proceedings of the 4th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT’08), Cambridge, UK
Havenith G, Heus R, Daanen HAM (1995) The hand in the cold, performance and risk. Arctic Medical Research, 54(Supplement 2): 1–11
Havenith G, Vrijkotte TGM (1993) Effectiveness of personal protective equipment for skin protection while working with pesticides in greenhouses. Part III, comfort and ergonomics. Report TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands
Heus R, Daanen HAM, Havenith G (1995) Physiological criteria for functioning of hands in the cold: a review. Applied Ergonomics, 26(1): 5–13
ISO (1998) ISO 9241-11: ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – part 11: guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Mackworth NH (1953) finger numbness in very cold winds. Journal of Applied Physiology, 5: 533–543
Maguire M (2001) Context of use within usability activities. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 55(4): 453–484
Met Office (2009) Coldest winter for a decade. Available at: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/pr20090225.html (Accessed on 13 August 2009)
Parsons K (2005) The environmental ergonomics survey. In: Wilson JR, Corlett R (eds.) Evaluation of human work, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, US
Riley M, Cochran D (1984) Dexterity performance and reduced ambient temperature. Human Factors, 26(2): 207–214
Shiffman L (1992) Effects of aging on adult hand function. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(9): 785–792
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elton, E., Dumolo, D., Nicolle, C. (2010). Have I Just Pressed Something? The Effects of Everyday Cold Temperatures on exterity. In: Langdon, P., Clarkson, P., Robinson, P. (eds) Designing Inclusive Interactions. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-166-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-166-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-165-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-166-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)