The word “robot” was originally coined by Karel Capek in his play, Rossum’s universal robots, in 1921.1 It is derived from the Czechoslovakian term robota, meaning forced work. His original vision dealt with a world in which robots help humans with everyday tasks but eventually turn on their masters and attempt world domination. The first truly robotic flexible arm, known as the Programmable Universal Manipulation Arm (PUMA), was developed in 1978, by Victor Scheinman, and quickly became the industry standard. The first surgical application of this technology was in 1985 when the PUMA 560 was used to orientate a needle for a radiologically guided brain biopsy.2 Soon after, robots were utilized in other surgeries including the PROBOT, to perform transurethral resection of the prostate, and the ROBODOC, for use in hip replacements.3–6
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Capek K. Rossum’s universal srobots [Playfair N, Selver P, trans. Landes WA, ed]. New York: Doubleday; 1923
Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153–160
Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 2000;214:129–140
Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickman JEA. A surgeon robot prostatectomy – a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol. 1989;13:273–277
Bann S, Khan M, Hernandez J, et al Robotics in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:784–795
Bauer A, Borner M, Lahmer A. Clinical experience with a medical robotic system for total hip replacement. In: Nolte LP, Ganz R, eds. Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery. Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber; 1999:128–133
Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future – a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1–6
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov). SEER*Stat Database: incidence – SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2004 Sub (1973–2002). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2005, based on the November 2004 submission
Meng MV, Elkin EP, et al Predictors of treatment after initial surveillance in men with prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2279–2283
Myers RP. Radical prostatectomy: making it a better operation in the new millennium. Int J Urol. 2001;8(7):S9–S14
Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905 J Urol. 2002;168(3):914–921
Reiner WB, Walsh PC. An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorini’s plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J Urol. 1979;121:198–200
Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128:492–497
Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am J Anat. 1980;158:229–296
Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997;50:854–857
Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol. 2000;163:418–422
Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, et al Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol. 2001;166:2101–2108
Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA, et al Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int. 2002;90:876–882
Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, et al Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002;60:864–868
Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408–410
Pasticier G, Rietbergen JBW, Guillonneau B, Fromont G, Menon M, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol. 2001;40:70–74
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168(3):945–949
Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–1741
Bhandari A, Peabody JO, et al Does surgical robot assist in safe learning of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? AUA Abstract [presented 05/10/04]
Hugh JL, Thaly R, Shah K, Patel V. The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional survey. AUA abstract [presented 05/20/07]
Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, et al Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology. 2008;72(1):15–23
Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008;22(10):1–7
Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–1741
Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, et al Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol. 2003;44:175–181
Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, et al A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92:205–210
Wolfram M, Brautigam R, Engl T, et al Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol. 2003;21:128–132
Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon’s outcomes. Urology. 2004;63:819–822
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D. Rapid communication: early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2005;19:715–718
Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, et al Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology. 2005;66:419–423
Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, et al Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int. 2005;96:39–42
Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, et al Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol. 2005;174:2291–2296
Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int. 2007;9(9):1109–1112
Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, et al Total reconstruction of vesicourethral junction. BJU Int. 2008;101:871–877
Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1951–1958
Shah K, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Patel VR. Early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(suppl 1):27
Coughlin G, Dangle P, Palmer K, et al Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve sparing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg. 2009 Mar;3(1)
Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P, et al Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2001;73:127–37
Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter. Eur Urol. 2007;52:376–83
Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology. 2003;61(4):699–702
Coughlin G, Dangle P, Patil N, et al Modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter: application to robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008 Nov;102(10):1482–5
Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, et al Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:996–1003
Nguyen MM, Kamoi K, Stein RJ, et al Early continence outcomes of posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction during robotic and laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2008;101:1135–1139
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coelho, R.F., Coughlin, G., Patel, V.R. (2010). Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. In: Dasgupta, P., Fitzpatrick, J., Kirby, R., Gill, I.S. (eds) New Technologies in Urology. New Techniques in Surgery Series, vol 7. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-178-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-178-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-177-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-178-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)