Abstract
This chapter provides exemplars of the influence of digital artifacts upon cultural experiences. We argue that the associations between people and artifacts, and specifically digital artifacts, is an increasingly dense, interwoven, and pivotal aspect of everyday cultural experience. Artifacts themselves resist any stability of meaning by being continuously disassembled and reassembled into newly meaningful assemblages. Digital artifacts extend this complexity by accelerating and extending cultural relationships both temporally and geographically, resulting in a wider range of potential and actual relationships in an expansive number of contexts. Through the connections that digital artifacts hold to people, there is a continuously fluid polysemous multivocality that incorporates the multiple and expansive parameters of power, meaning, and cultural knowledge. The human ability to alter and repurpose artifacts to suit immediate and shifting needs prevents any innate definitional quality from making a “table” a table or a “blog” a blog. Purpose and meaning of an artifact is continuously defined and then redefined between individuals and across time, beyond the reach of the original designers or manufacturers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arbib, M., & Hesse, M. (1986). The construction of reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Aunger, R. (2006). Cultural transmission and diffusion. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (p. 724). London: Wiley.
Barnes, B. (1997, February 27). “Nothing But Net”, Webhead. Slate. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http://www.slate.com/id/2543/
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. (Original work published 1981).
Baudrillard, J. (1996). The system of objects (J. Benedict, Trans.). London, UK: Verso. (Original work published 1970).
Bereano, P. (1997). Technology is a tool of the powerful. In D. Erman, M. Williams, & M. Shauf (Eds.), Computers, ethics and society (pp. 26–32). New York: Oxford University Press.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
Buchli, V. (1995). Interpreting material culture: The trouble with text. In I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last, & G. Lucas (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology (pp. 181–193). London: Routledge.
Buchli, V. (2002). Introduction. In V. Buchli (Ed.), The material culture reader (pp. 1–22). Berg: Oxford, UK.
Criado, F. (1997). The visibility of the archaeological record and the interpretation of social reality, In I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last, & G. Lucas (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology (pp. 194–204). London: Routledge.
Cronin, M. (1998, May). The travel agents’ dilemma. Fortune, 137, 163–164.
Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe (J. Harkness, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: Quantum Books. (Original work published 1973).
Gadamer, G. (1989). Truth and method. New York: Crossroad.
Geertz, C. (1993). The interpretation of culture: Selected essays. London: Fontana. (Original work published in 1973).
Gottdiener, M. (1995). Postmodern semiotics: Material culture and the forms of postmodern life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Graham, S. (1997). Imagining the real-time city. In S. Westwood & J. Williams (Eds.), Imagining cities: Scripts, signs and memory (pp. 31–49). London: Routledge.
Green, N. (1997). Beyond being digital: Representation and virtual corporeality. In D. Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 228–241). London: Sage Publications.
Hides, S. (1997). The genealogy of material culture and cultural identity. In S. Pearce (Ed.), Experiencing material culture in the Western world (pp. 11–35). London: Leicester University Press.
Hodder, I. (1989). Postmodernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology. In I. Hodder (Ed.), The meaning of things: Material culture and symbolic expression (pp. 64–71). Hammersmith, UK: HarperCollins Academic.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lemonnier, P. (1993). Introduction. In P. Lemonnier (Ed.), Technological choices: Arbitraries in technology from the Neolithic to modern high technology (pp. 1–35). London: Routledge.
Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24 95–117.
Miller, D. (1991). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, UK: Berg.
Oldenziel, R. (1996). Object/ions: Technology, culture and gender. In W. Kingery (Ed.), Learning from things: Method and theory of material culture studies (pp. 55–69). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Pearson, M. (1997). Tombs and territories: Material culture and multiple interpretations. In I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last, & G. Lucas (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology (pp. 205–209). London: Routledge.
Rich, L. (1998, February 23). Grounding cyberspace. AdWeek, 8, 29–30.
Richardson, M. (1974). The human mirror: Material and spatial images of man. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). What is a Text? Explanation and understanding. In J. Thompson (Ed.), Hermeneutics and the human sciences (pp. 145–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sclafane, S. (1998). Web sites create world wide exposure. National Underwriter Property & Casualty, 102(6), 14, 31.
Shanks, M., & Hodder, I. (1997). Processual, postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies. In I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last, & G. Lucas (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology (pp. 3–29). London: Routledge.
Sheridan, T., & David S. Zeltzer (1997). “Virtual Reality”: Really? In P. Agre & D. Schuler (Eds.), Reinventing technology, rediscovering community: Critical explorations of computing as a social practice (pp. 85–94). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Silver, D. (2000). Looking backwards, looking forwards: Cyberculture studies 1990–2000. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web.studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 19–30). London: Edward Arnold.
Smart, B. (1992). Modern conditions, postmodern controversies. London: Routledge.
Smith, A. (1998). Caught up in the Web. Progressive Grocer, 77(3), 32.
Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The assertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
Sterling, B. (2005). Shaping things. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
Thomas, J. (1997). Reconciling symbolic significance with being-in-the-world. In I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last, & G. Lucas (Eds.), Interpreting archaeology (pp. 210–211). London: Routledge.
Thrift, N. (1996). New urban eras and old technological fears: Reconfiguring the goodwill of electronic things. Urban Studies, 33, 1463–1494.
Tilley, C. (1989). Interpreting material culture. In I. Hodder (Ed.), The meaning of things: Material culture and symbolic expression (pp. 23–26). Hammersmith, UK: HarperCollins Academic.
Tilley, C. (2002). Metaphor, materiality and interpretation. In V. Buchli (Ed.), The material culture reader (pp. 184–194). Oxford, UK: Berg.
Touraine, A. (1974). The post-industrial society. London: Random House.
Wakeford, N. (2000). New media, new methodologies: Studying the Web. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web.studies: Rewiring media studies for the digital age (pp. 31–41). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Whittle, D. (1997). Cyberspace: The human dimension. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Wise, J. M. (1997). Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenhill, A., Fletcher, G. (2009). The Polysemy of Human–Computer Interaction. In: Isomäki, H., Saariluoma, P. (eds) Future Interaction Design II. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-300-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-385-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)