Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utility and Experience in the Evolution of Usability

  • Chapter
Maturing Usability

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the evolution of usability and its implications for usability research and practice. We propose that the concept of usability evolved from a narrow focus on individual performance to a more inclusive concept of experience and the collective. We address three major trends: cognition-performance, emotional-experience, and social context-experience which, together, seem to reflect those pervading the field of usability. We argue that the movement away from the strictly cognitive, performance-oriented concerns to embracing emotion and eventually social and cultural aspects can largely be attributed to two forces. One is a change in tasks, technologies, and the objectives of systems. The other is the realization that performance alone in the cognitive sense is not enough to account for the richness of phenomena influencing people’s interactions with technology. We then discuss the importance of aesthetics and emotion, and finally, usability in the context of collaborative and social computing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, C. (1990). Definitions of groupware. Applied Groupware, 1, 1–2.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J.E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management science, 29 (5), 530–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K., Greenberg, S., & Gutwin, C. (2002). Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of the mind. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behaviour & Information technology, (2006), 25 (2): Special issue on empirical studies of the user experience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., & Forgas, J.P. (1998). The message within: the role of subjective experience in social cognition and behaviour. Philadelphia psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, M., Reid, J., Wright, P., & Geelhoed, E. (2006). Interdisciplinary criticism: analysing the experience of riot! A location-sensitive digital narrative. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (2), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. (1989). A human activity approach to user interfaces. Human Computer Interaction, 4 (3), 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S. (1991). Through the Interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: a project for integrating primate behaviour and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., & Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 32–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L., Wyer, R.S., Jr., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C. & Isbell, L. (2001). Affective feelings as feedback: some cognitive consequences. In L.L. Martin & G.L. Clore (Eds), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 27–62). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D. (1984). The art of computer game design, Osborne/McGraw-Hill, Berkeley, CA; reproduced on http://www.vancouver.wsu. Edu/fac/Peabody/game-book/coverpage.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupchik, G.C. (1993). Component and relational processing in aesthetics. Poetics, 22, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2000). A second chance for emotion. In R. D. Lane & L. Nadel (Eds), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotions (pp. 12–23). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Araujo, R.M., Santoro, F.M., & Borges, M.R.S. (2003). The CSCW lab ontology for groupware evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (pp. 148–153).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, P.J., & Dunham, R. (2003). The missing customer. Communications of the ACM, 46(3), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., & Galuppe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, K. (2000). Built for use: Driving profitability through the user experience. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, J. (2000). Extending usability inspection techniques for collaborative systems. In Proceedings of CHI2000 (pp. 81–82).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensor, R. (1990). How can we make groupware practical? A panel. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 87–89). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewusi-Menash, K. (1997). Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects. Communications of the ACM, 40 (9), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, G., Lindgaard, G., Dillon, R., & Wood, J. (2003). Judging the appeal of web sites. In Proceedings 4th World Congress on the Management of Electronic Commerce, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, 15–17 January (on CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. (2001). Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accommodation. In L.L. Martin & G.L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 85–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J.P. (2001). The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In L.L. Martin & G.L. Clore (Eds), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 99–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1977). Organization Design. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galitz, W.O. (1981). Handbook of screen design format (1st Edition, Q.E.D.) Wellesley, MA: Information Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  • Galitz, W.O. (1993). User-interface screen design. Toronto: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, I. (ed.) (1988). Computer supported collaborative work: A book of readings. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1994). Computer supported cooperative work: History and focus. IEEE Computer, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2000a). The mechanics of collaboration: Developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. In Proceedings 9th IEEE WETICE: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (pp. 98–103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2000b). The effect of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6 (3), 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer interaction, 19 (4), 319–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M,, Beu, A., & Burmeister, M. (2001). Engineering joy. IEEE Software, January/February, 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijden van der, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic: portal in the Netherlands. Information and Management, 40 (6), 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helander, M.TG., & Tham, M.P. (2003). Hedonomics – affective human factors design. Ergonomics, 46, 2369–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzik, M.A. (1999). Dealers of lightning: Xerox PARC and the dawn of the computer age (pp. 194–201). New York: Harper Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human-Computer Interaction (2004). Special Section: Beauty, goodness, and usability, 19 (4), 311–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interacting with Computers (2004). Special Issue on Affective Computing, 16 (4), 683–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1997). ISO/DIS 9241–11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Guidance on usability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. (2000). Designing pleasurable products. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kearnes, D.T., & Nadler, D.H. (1992). Prophets in the dark: How Xerox reinvented itself and beat back toe Japanese. Hammersmith, London: Harper Collins Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.E. (2003). Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), HCI models, theories and frameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science (pp. 325–356). New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling, Vol. I. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, T., & Tractinsky, N. (2004). Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 6, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, H. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 46, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiner, B.M., Cerf, V.G., Clak, D.D., Kahn, R.E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D.C., Postel, J., Roberts, L.G., & Wolff, S.S. (1997). The past and future history of the internet. Communications of the ACM, 40 (2), 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability testing and system evaluation: A guide for designing useful computer systems. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G. (1995). Cementing human factors into product design: Moving beyond policies. In Proceedings of 15th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, Melbourne (pp. 361–371).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G. (2002). Deconstructing silos: The business value of usability in the 21st Century, invited keynote presentation. In Proceedings of 17th. IFIP (International Federation for Information Processing) World Computer Congress (pp. 3–20). Montreal, August 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G., & Dudek, C. (2002). User satisfaction, aesthetics and usability: Beyond reductionism. In Hammond, T. Gross & J. Wesson (Eds), Usability gaining a competitive edge, Proceedings IFIP 17th World Computer Congress (pp. 231–246). Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G., & Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction?. Interacting with Computers, 15(3), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G., Dillon, R. F., Trbovich, P, White, R., Fernandes, G., Lundahl, S., & Pinnamaneni, A. (2006a). User needs analysis and requirement engineering: Theory and practice. Interacting with Computers, 18 (1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006b). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgaard, G., & Whitfield, T. W. A. (2004). Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5 (1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlke, S. (2006). Studying user experience with digital audio players. In: Proceedings of ICEC2006, 5th International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 258–361), 20–22 September, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L.L., & Clore, G.L. (2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, D. (1986). Human factors testing and evaluation: Advances in human factors/ergonomics. North-Holland: Elsevier science publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardie, B. (1996a). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. (1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In Nardi, B. (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., Schiano, D.J., & Gumbrecht, M. (2004). Blogging as a social activity or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In CHI Letters, 6 (3), 222–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nass, C., & Reeves, B. (1996). The media experience: How people treat computers. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work? In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’95, Denver, CO, May 7–11) (pp. 362–368). New York: ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. (1992). How a group-editor changes the character of a design meeting as well as its outcome. In Mantel, M. & Baecker, R., (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’92, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31–Nov. 4) (pp. 91–98). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parush, A., Nadir, R., & Shtub, A. (1998). Evaluating the layout of graphical user interface screens: Validation of a numerical, computerized model. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 10 (4), 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parush, A,, Shwartz, Y., Shtub, A., & Chandra, J. (2005). The impact of visual layout factors on performance in web pages: A cross-language study. Human Factors, 47(1), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. (Eds.) (1966). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Free Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R.W. (1998). Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2003). Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(4), 281–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porteous, J. D. (1996). Environmental aesthetics: ideas, politics, and planning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, F. (1989). West of Eden: the end of innocence at Apple computer. Ringwood, Australia: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, March, 1161–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkman, B. N., & Jönsson, F. U. (2000). Aesthetics and preferences of web pages. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19, 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, H.R. (1976). Sensation and perception: An integrated approach. New York: John Wiley Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, D. (2005). Aesthetics: definition and contribution to the field of human computer interaction. Unpublished manuscript, Human Oriented Technology Lab (HOTLab), Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. (pp. 111–147). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steves, M.P., Morse, E., Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2001). A comparison of usage evaluation and inspection methods for assessing groupware usability. In Proceedings of Group’01 (pp. 125–134). Sept. 30–Oct. 3, 2001. Boulder, CO: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steves, M.P., & Scholtz, J. (1999). Modified field studies for CSCW systems. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 20 (2), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiemerling, O., & Cremers, A.B. (1998). The use of cooperation scenarios in the design and evaluation of a CSCW system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24 (12), 1171–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human computer communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. (2002). User-centred requirements engineering: Theory and practice. London: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tractinsky, N., Katz, A., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tractinsky, N., & Zmiri, D. (2006). Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In P. Fishwick (Ed), Aesthetic computing. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam, A. (1997). Post-(WIMP) user interfaces. Communications of the ACM, 40(2), 63–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 20, 77–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdralek, J. (2003). White Space. “How much nothing should there be?”. Unpublished MA thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaga, H., & Easterby, R. (Eds.). (1984). Information design: The design and evaluation of signs and printed material. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Oriented Technology Lab (HOTLab), Carleton University, Canada

    Gitte Lindgaard & Avi Parush

Authors
  1. Gitte Lindgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Avi Parush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut TIK, ETH Zürich, Switzerland

    Effie Lai-Chong Law

  2. Computer Science Department, University of Iceland, Iceland

    Ebba Thora Hvannberg PhD

  3. University of Sunderland, UK

    Gilbert Cockton MA, PGCE,PhD, CITP, FBCS, FRSA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindgaard, G., Parush, A. (2008). Utility and Experience in the Evolution of Usability. In: Law, E.LC., Hvannberg, E.T., Cockton, G. (eds) Maturing Usability. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-940-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-941-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation