Abstract
Trust plays an important role in facilitating information and knowledge sharing (e.g. Levin and Cross 2004; Szulanski et al. 2004). It helps create a knowledge-sharing culture by encouraging knowledge seeking and motivating knowledge contribution (Kankanhalli et al. 2005). It increases the effectiveness of knowledge sharing: A trusting knowledge contributor gives out more information and information of higher quality (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998), and a trusting recipient perceives the received information more favorably and is more likely to act on it (Sussman and Siegal 2003). The importance and the effects of trust for knowledge sharing are well documented; however, much less research has explored the development of such trust.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Armstrong A, Hagel JI (1996) The Real Value of on-Line Communities. Harvard Business Review 74:3 134–141
Bailey JE, Pearson SW (1983) Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science 29:5 530–545
Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science 2:1 40–57
Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA
Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:5 752–766
Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:3 460–473
Chin WW (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Modern Methods for Business Research. Marcoulides GA (ed) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science 7:2 119–135
Finholt T, Sproull LS (1990) Electronic Groups at Work. Organization Science 1:141–64
Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE (1998) Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14:4 29–64
Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei K-K (2005) Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly 29:1 113–144
Kling R, Courtright C (2003) Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical Approach. Information Society 19:3 221–235
Leimeister JM, Ebner W, Krcmar H (2005) Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients. Journal of Management Information Systems 21:4 101
Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 50:11 1477–1490
Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review 20:3 709–734
Melnik MI, Aim J (2002) Does a Seller’s Ecommerce Reputation Matter? Evidence from Ebay Auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics 50:3 337–349
Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In: Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Kramer RM and Tyler TR (eds) Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 167–195
Preece J (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Jonh Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA
Ridings CM, Gefen D, Arinze B (2002) Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11:3-4 271–295
Sussman SW, Siegal WS (2003) Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Information Systems Research 14:1 47–65
Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen RJ (2004) When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science 15:5 600–613
Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal 41:4 464–476
Wasko MM, Faraj S (2000) “It Is What One Does”: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 155–173
Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 29:1 35–57
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wellman B (2001) Computer Networks as Social Networks. Science 293 2031–2034
Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williams M (2001) In Whom We Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development. Academy of Management Review 26:3 377–396
Zetlin M (2002) Putting Communities to Work. Computerworld. June 3, 2002
Zhang W, Storck J (2001) Peripheral Members in Online Communities. AMCIS 2001, Boston, MA
Zhang W, Watts S (2002) Donkeys Travel the World: Knowledge Management in Online Communities of Practice. AMCIS 2002, Dallas, TX
Zhang W, Watts S (2004) Knowledge Adoption in Online Communities of Practice. Systemes d’Information et Management 9:1 81–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, W. (2007). Trust in Electronic Networks of Practice: An Integrative Model. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B.T., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds) Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-904-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-905-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)