Skip to main content

Trust in Electronic Networks of Practice: An Integrative Model

  • Conference paper
Communities and Technologies 2007

Abstract

Trust plays an important role in facilitating information and knowledge sharing (e.g. Levin and Cross 2004; Szulanski et al. 2004). It helps create a knowledge-sharing culture by encouraging knowledge seeking and motivating knowledge contribution (Kankanhalli et al. 2005). It increases the effectiveness of knowledge sharing: A trusting knowledge contributor gives out more information and information of higher quality (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998), and a trusting recipient perceives the received information more favorably and is more likely to act on it (Sussman and Siegal 2003). The importance and the effects of trust for knowledge sharing are well documented; however, much less research has explored the development of such trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong A, Hagel JI (1996) The Real Value of on-Line Communities. Harvard Business Review 74:3 134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JE, Pearson SW (1983) Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science 29:5 530–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science 2:1 40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:5 752–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:3 460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Modern Methods for Business Research. Marcoulides GA (ed) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science 7:2 119–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finholt T, Sproull LS (1990) Electronic Groups at Work. Organization Science 1:141–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Knoll K, Leidner DE (1998) Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14:4 29–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei K-K (2005) Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly 29:1 113–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling R, Courtright C (2003) Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical Approach. Information Society 19:3 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister JM, Ebner W, Krcmar H (2005) Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients. Journal of Management Information Systems 21:4 101

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 50:11 1477–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review 20:3 709–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnik MI, Aim J (2002) Does a Seller’s Ecommerce Reputation Matter? Evidence from Ebay Auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics 50:3 337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson D, Weick KE, Kramer RM (1996) Swift Trust and Temporary Groups. In: Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Kramer RM and Tyler TR (eds) Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 167–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece J (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Jonh Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridings CM, Gefen D, Arinze B (2002) Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11:3-4 271–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman SW, Siegal WS (2003) Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption. Information Systems Research 14:1 47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen RJ (2004) When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity. Organization Science 15:5 600–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal 41:4 464–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2000) “It Is What One Does”: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 29:1 35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B (2001) Computer Networks as Social Networks. Science 293 2031–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (2001) In Whom We Trust: Group Membership as an Affective Context for Trust Development. Academy of Management Review 26:3 377–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zetlin M (2002) Putting Communities to Work. Computerworld. June 3, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Storck J (2001) Peripheral Members in Online Communities. AMCIS 2001, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Watts S (2002) Donkeys Travel the World: Knowledge Management in Online Communities of Practice. AMCIS 2002, Dallas, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Watts S (2004) Knowledge Adoption in Online Communities of Practice. Systemes d’Information et Management 9:1 81–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, W. (2007). Trust in Electronic Networks of Practice: An Integrative Model. In: Steinfield, C., Pentland, B.T., Ackerman, M., Contractor, N. (eds) Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-904-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-905-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics