Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Adhesion Prevention

  • Chapter
Complications in Gynecological Surgery

Abstract

Use of adhesion prevention adjuvants has become the standard of practice following gynecologic as well as general surgery [13]. The frequent occurrence of adhesions after peritoneal cavity surgery and clinical consequences of adhesions, including increased rates of reoperation, postoperative bowel obstruction, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain, which markedly increase healthcare costs, make prevention of adhesions a major contributor to successful postoperative outcome. Devices that reduce postsurgical adhesion formation are a great benefit in reducing postoperative morbidity and failed surgical therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Tambiurro S, et al. Adhesion prevention in the surgical treatment of pelvic endometriosis. Gynaecol Endosc. 2001;10:99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tulandi T. Introduction-prevention of adhesion formation: the journey continues. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:545–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Musawi D, Thompson JN. Adhesion prevention: state of the art. Gynaecol Endosc. 2001;10:123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luciano AA. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis. Ref Gynecol Obstet. Experts Conference Vichy IFFFS; 1995:119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  5. diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion. Hum Reprod. 2001;7:547–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiseman DM, Trout JR, Diamond MP. The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:702–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shear L, Swartz C, Shinaberger J, et al. Kinetics of peritoneal fluid absorption in adult man. NEnglJMed. 1965;272:123–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haret R, Magos A. Laparoscopically instilled fluid: the rate of absorption and the effects on patient discomfort and fluid balance. Gynecol Endosc. 1996;5:287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. diZerega GS. Peritoneum, peritoneal healing, and adhesion formation. In: diZerega GS, ed. Peritoneal Surgery. New York: Springer Verlag; 2000:3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johns JB, Rodgers KE, Donahue WD, et al. Reduction of adhesion formation by postoperative administration of ionically cross-linked hyaluronic acid. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thornton MH, Johns DB, Campeau JD, et al. Clinical evaluation of 0.5% ferric hyal-uronate adhesion prevention gel for the reduction of adhesions following peritoneal cavity surgery; open label pilot study. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1480–1485.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johns DB, Keyport GM, Hoehler F, et al. Prevention Study Group. Reduction of postsurgical adhesions with Intergel adhesion prevention solution: a multicenter study of safety and efficacy after conservative gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:595–604.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lundroff P, van Geldrop H, Tronstad SE, et al. Reduction of post-surgical adhesions with ferric hyaluronate gel: a European study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1982–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thornton MH. Reduction of adhesion formation with Gynecare Intergel Adhesion Prevention solution following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Am Association Gynecol Laparoscopits. 2002;9:S55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verco SJS, Peers EM, Brown CB, et al. Development of a novel glucose polymer solution (Icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: pre-clinical studies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1764–1772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. diZerega GS, Verco SJS, Young P, et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution (Adept®) in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod. 2002;17;1031–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Korell M. Aktuelle Adhaesionsprophylaxe in der operativen Gynaekologie. Der Gyn-aekologe. 2002 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:567–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

diZerega, G.S., Korell, M. (2008). Recent Advances in Adhesion Prevention. In: O’Donovan, P. (eds) Complications in Gynecological Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-883-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-882-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-883-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics