Skip to main content

Abstract

Study design is a fundamental aspect of research. If the design of a study is poor, no amount of clever analysis will provide reliable results. The results from poorly designed studies could be meaningless, and many resources will have been wasted, not to mention the possible risk to the subjects, which would be unethical. Therefore, it is essential that researchers invest adequate time and effort in designing their studies appropriately. It would be advisable to involve a medical statistician or an epidemiologist at the design stage of a study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A. Sample Size Tables for Clinical Studies, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Science; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marre M, Lievre M, Chatellier G, Mann JFE, Passa P, Ménard J. Effects of low dose ramipril on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and raised excretion of urinary albumin: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial (the DIABHYCAR study). BMJ 2004;328:495.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Frith P, Fazekas BS, McHugh A, Bui C. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of sustained release morphine for the management of refractory dyspnoea. BMJ 2003;327:523–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jordan WM. Pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1961;2:1146–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Linnell AAJ, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998;351:637–641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Health Survey for England. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/PublishedSurvey/HealthSurveyForEngland/fs/en.

  7. Young J, Geest SD, Spirig R, et al. For the Swiss HIV Cohort Study Group. Stable partnership and progression to AIDS or death in HIV infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: Swiss HIV cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smeeth L, Cook C, Fombonne E, et al. MMR vaccination and pervasive developmental disorders: a case-control study. Lancet 2004;364: 963–969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference. In: Modern Epidemiology. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven; 1998:7–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Omar, R.Z., Barber, J.A., Ambler, G. (2007). Designing Health Studies. In: Patel, H.R.H., Arya, M., Shergill, I.S. (eds) Basic Science Techniques in Clinical Practice. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-740-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-740-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-546-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-740-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics