Skip to main content

Abstract

The predominant approaches to automating competitive interaction appeal to the central notion of a utility function that represents an agent’s preferences. Agent’s are then endowed with machinery that enables them to perform actions that are intended to optimise their expected utility. Despite the extent of this work, the deployment of automatic negotiating agents in real world scenarios is rare. We propose that utility functions, or preference orderings, are often not known with certainty; further, the uncertainty that underpins them is typically in a state of flux. We propose that the key to building intelligent negotiating agents is to take an agent’s historic observations as primitive, to model that agent’s changing uncertainty in that information, and to use that model as the foundation for the agent’s reasoning. We describe an agent architecture, with an attendant theory, that is based on that model. In this approach, the utility of contracts, and the trust and reliability of a trading partner are intermediate concepts that an agent may estimate from its information model. This enables us to describe intelligent agents that are not necessarily utility optimisers, that value information as a commodity, and that build relationships with other agents through the trusted exchange of information as well as contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wooldridge, M.: Multiagent Systems. Wiley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez, J.A., Sierra, C: Environment engineering for multiagent systems. Journal on Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Muthoo, A.: Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge UP (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Klemperer, P.: The Economic Theory of Auctions: Vols I and II. Edward Elgar (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paris, J.: Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117 (1999) 75–93

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaynes, E.: Probability Theory — The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaeger, M.: Representation independence of nonmonotonic inference relations. In: Proceedings of KR’96, Morgan Kaufmann (1996) 461–472

    Google Scholar 

  10. Debenham, J., Simoff, S.: An agent establishes trust with equitable information revelation. In Subrahmanian, V., Regli, W., eds.: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Multi-Agent Security and Survivability, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA, IEEE (2005) 66–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sierra, C, Debenham, J.: Trust and honour in information-based agency. In: Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS-2006, Hakodate, Japan, ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sierra, C, Jennings, N., Noriega, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Intelligent Agents IV: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-97), Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany (1998) 177–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheeseman, P., Stutz, J.: On The Relationship between Bayesian and Maximum Entropy Inference. In: Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY. USA (2004) 445–461

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faratin, P., Sierra, C, Jennings, N.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142 (2003) 205–237

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debenham, J., Simoff, S. (2007). Negotiating Intelligently. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Tuson, A. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXIII. SGAI 2006. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-663-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-663-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-662-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-663-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics