Abstract
Several car driver models are available in the literature. From an historical point of view, it is possible to identify three main phases, for the last 40 years, in this research area. The works of (1970), centred on task analysis, are typically representative of the studies carried out during the 1970s. The authors proposed a taxonomy of the main driving tasks (e.g. accelerating, steering, overtaking, lane changing) organised in nine categories (e.g. basic control tasks, tasks related to traffic condition). This work closely parallels the research of Allen et al. (1970), who divided the driving task in three levels: the microperformance, the situational performance and the macroperformance. These levels differ both according to their time scale and with regard to the kind of cognitive activity required. At the microperformance level, most of the actions are automated skills. Steering and speed control are the main subtasks. Feedback loops, concerning driving action implemented at this level, are very short (on the order of seconds). The macroperformance concerns the trip planning and the route finding during the trip. It corresponds to slow conscious processes requiring cognitive resources. The time scale can be hours at this level. Between these two levels, situational performance corresponds to the analysis of the road environment and to the selection of relevant behaviour in the current situation and traffic conditions. Performance at this level is determined by the driver’s perception and understanding of the driving context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, T.M., Lunenfield, H. and Alexander, G.J. (1971). Driver information needs. Highway Research Record, 366, 102–115.
Amalberti, R. and Deblon, F. (1992). Cognitive modelling of fighter aircraft’s control process: A step towards intelligent onboard assistance system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 639–671.
Amidi, O. (1990). Integrated mobile robot control. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-90-17. Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute.
Bailly, B. (2004). Conscience de la situation des conducteurs: Aspects fondamentaux? méthodes, et applications pour la formation des conducteurs. PhD Thesis, Université Lyon 2.
Bailly, B., Bellet, T. and Goupil, C. (2003). Driver’s mental representations: Experimental study and training perspectives. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Driver Behaviour and Training, Stratford-upon-Avon, England. CD-ROM, 8 pp.
Bellet, T. (1998). Modélisation et simulation cognitive de l’opérateur humain: une application à la conduite automobile. PhD Thesis, Université Paris V.
Bellet, T. and Tattegrain-Veste, H. (1999). A framework for representing driving knowledge. Intenational Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(1), 37–49.
Bellet, T. and Tattegrain-Veste, H. (2003). COSMODRIVE: un modèle de simulation cognitive du conducteur automobile. In J.C. Spérandio and M. Wolf (Eds.). Formalismes de modélisation pour l’analyse du travail et l’ergonomie (pp. 77–110). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Bellet, T., Tattegrain-Veste, H., Chapon, A., Bruyas, M.P., Pachiaudi, G., Deleurence, P. and Guilhon, V. (2003). Ingénierie cognitive dans le contexte de l’assistance à la conduite automobile. In G. Boy (Ed.). L’Ingénierie Cognitive: IHM et Cognition. Hermès, Paris.
Cacciabue, P.C., Decortis, F., Drozdowicz, B., Masson, M. and Nordvik, J.P. (1992). COSIMO: A cognitive simulation model of human decision making and behaviour in accident management of complex plants. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics? IEEE-SMC, 22(5), 1058–1074.
Champin, P.-A., Prie, Y. and Mille, A. (2004). Musette: A framework for knowledge capture from experience. In Proceedings of EGC04, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Chapman, P.R. and Underwood, G. (1998). Visual search of dynamic scenes: Event types and the role of experience in viewing driving simulation. In G. Underwood (Ed.). Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception. Elsevier, North Holland.
Crundall, D., Underwood, G. and Chapman, P. (1999). Driving experience and the functional field of view. Perception, 28, 1075–1087.
Dubois, D., Fleury, D. and Mazet, C. (1993). Représentations catégorielles: perception et/ou action? Contribution à partir d’une analyse des situations routières. In A. Weill-Fassina, P. Rabardel and D. Dubois (Eds.). Représentations pour l’action (pp. 79–93). Octares Editions, Toulouse.
Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
Georgeon, O., Bellet, T., Mille, A., Lettisserand, D. and Martin, R. (2005). Driver behaviour modelling and cognitive tools development in order to assess driver situation awareness. In Proceedings of HUMANIST Workshop on Driver Modelling, Ispra, Italy, 25–27 May 2005.
Gibson, J.J. and Crooks, L.E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–471.
Hall, E.T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, Garden City.
Fuller, R.A. (1984). Conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance. Ergonomics, 27(11), 1139–1155.
Kontaratos, N.A. (1974). A system analysis of the problem of road causalities in the United State. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 223–241.
Krajzewicz, D., Hühne, R.D. and Wagner, P. (2004). A car driver cognition model. In Proceedings of ITS Safety and Security 2004, Miami Beach, FL, 24–25 March 2004.
Lamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M. and Summala, H. (1999). Cognitive load and detection thresolds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 31, 617–623.
Levison, W.H. (1993). A simulation model for driver’s use of in-vehicle information systems. Transportation Research Record, 1403, 7–13.
Mayenobe, P. (2004). Perception de l’environnement pour une gestion contextualisée de la coopération Homme-Machine. PhD Thesis, University Blaise Pascal de Clermont-Ferrand.
Mayenobe, P., Blanc, C., Trassoudaine, L., Bellet, T. and TattegrainVeste, H. (2003). Active perception tasks driven by a cognitive simulation model. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium: IV-2003, Columbus, OH (pp. 378–382).
Mayenobe, P., Trassoudaine, L., Bellet, T. and TattegrainVeste, H. (2002). Cognitive simulation of the driver and cooperative driving assistances. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium: IV-2002, Versailles, June 17–21, 2002 (pp. 265–271).
Mc Knight, A.J. and Adams, B.B. (1970). Driver Education Task Analysis. Vol. I: Task Descriptions. Human Resources Research Organisation HumRRO, Alexandria.
Mourant, R.R. and Rockwell, T.H. (1972). Strategies of visual search by novices and experiences drivers. Human Factors, 14(4), 325–335.
Michon, J.A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior model: What do we know, what should we do? In Evans and R.C. Schwing (Eds.). Human Behavior and Traffic Safety (pp. 485–520). Plenum Press, New York.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.). The Psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–281). McGraw-Hill, New York.
Näätänen, R. and Summala, H. (1976). A model for the role of motivational factors in driver’s decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 243–261.
Ochanine, V.A. (1977). Concept of operative image in engineering and general psychology. In B.F. Lomov, V.F. Rubakhin and V.F. Venda (Eds.). Engineering Psychology. Science Publisher, Moscow.
Otha, H. (1993). Individual differences in driving distance headway. In A.G. Gale (Ed.). Vision in Vehicles IV. Elsevier, Netherlands.
Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules and knowledge; Signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257–266.
Recarte, M.A. and Nunes, L.M. (2000). Effect of verbal and spatial-imagery task on eye fixations while driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 31–43.
Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, J., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W. and Premerlani, W. (1991). Object Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, Londres.
Salvucci, D.D., Boer, E.R. and Liu, A. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Record, 1779, 9–16.
Schneider, W. and Schiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1–66.
Schneider, W. and Chein J.M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525–559.
Sukthankar, R. (1997). Situation Awareness for Tactical Driving. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
Thorn, R. (1991). Prédire n’est pas expliquer. Eshel, Paris.
Van der Molen, H.H. and Bötticher, M.T. (1988). A hierarchical risk model for traffic participants. Ergonomics, 31(4), 537–555.
Van Elslande, P. (1992). Les erreurs d’interprétation en conduite automobile: mauvaise catégorisation ou activation erronée de schémas? Intellectica, 15(3), 125–149.
Wierda, M. and Aasman, J. (1992). Seeing and driving: Computation, algorithms and implementation. Traffic Research Centre, University of Groningen, Netherlands, Haren: Verkeerskundig Studiecentrum, VK91–06.
Wilde, G.J.S. (1982). Critical issues in risk homeostasis theory. Risk Analysis, 2(4), 249–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellet, T., Bailly, B., Mayenobe, P., Georgeon, O. (2007). Cognitive Modelling and Computational Simulation of Drivers Mental Activities. In: Cacciabue, P.C. (eds) Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_18
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-617-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-618-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)