Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design planning and modelling

  • Chapter
Design process improvement

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin S, Baldwin A, Li B, Waskett P (2000) Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): a dependency structure matrix tool to schedule the building design process. Construction Management and Economics, 18: 173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booch G (1993) Object-oriented analysis and design with applications. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch G, Jacobson I, Rumbaugh J (1998) Unified modelling language user guide. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1976) Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71: 791–799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3): 292–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR (2002) Process integration using the design structure matrix. Systems Engineering, 5(3): 180–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning TR, Eppinger SD (2002) Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4): 428–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Hamilton JR (2000) Signposting: a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Research in Engineering Design, 12(1): 18–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Melo A, Eckert CM (2000) Visualization of routes in design process planning. IV’00, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellen B, Maurer F (1996) Integrating planning and execution in software development processes. WET ICE’96, Stanford, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou WC, Cai SJ (2002) Hybrid system for functional analysis on different stages of production system lifecycle. CE2002, Cranfield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl CF, Eckert CM, Johnson JH (2001) Complexity of planning in design. ASME DETC’01, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2003) The reality of design process planning. ICED’03, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger SD, Whitney DE, Smith RP, Gebala DA (1994) A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design, 6: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin AN, Gleeson JW, Gwiflian D (1989) An assessment of the IDEF notations as descriptive tools. Information Systems, 14(1): 13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guivarch AD (2002) Resolving timing issues using DSMs: application at Ford Motor company. DSM’02, Boston, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I, Christerson M, Jonsson P, Overgaard G (1992) Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (1999) Unified software development process. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A, Wang J (1993) Efficient organizing of design activities. International Journal of Production Research, 31(4): 753–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Langen PHG (2002) The anatomy of design: foundations, models and applications. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer F, Dellen B, Bendeck F, Goldmann S, Holz H, Kötting B, Schaaf M (2000) Merging project planning and Web-enabled dynamic workflow technologies. IEEE Internet Computing, 4(3): 65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer R, Menzer C, Painter M, deWitte P, Blinn T, Perakath B (1995) IDEF3 process description capture method report. Knowledge Based Systems Incorporated, Texas, TX, USA http://www.idef.com/Downloads/pdf/Idef3_fn.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon CA, Sims Williams JH, Brown KN (1993) A transformationmodel for the integration of design computing. ICED’93, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo AF, Clarkson PJ (2002) Planning and scheduling based on an explicit representation of the state of the design. ASME DETC’02, Montreal, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C (1998) An introduction to complexity and business. Complexity, 3(4): 21–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIST (1993) Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 183, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Noran OS (2000) Business modelling: UML vs. IDEF. Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/~noran/Docs/UMLvsIDEF.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan B, Clarkson PJ, Eckert CM (2003) Signposting: modelling uncertainty in design processes. ICED03, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan B, Clarkson PJ, Eckert CM (2004) Simulating design processes to assist design process planning. ASME DETC’04, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson JL (1981) Petri net theory and the modeling of systems. Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Pich M, Loch C, De Meyer A (2002) On uncertainty and complexity on project management. Management Science, 48(8): 1008–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI Standards Committee (2000) A project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Project Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Puangpool S, Damrianant J (2002) An application of restricted colored petri nets for concurrent engineering in construction. CE2002, Cranfield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh J, Booch G, Jacobson I (1999) Unified modelling language reference manual. Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997) Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Science, 43(3): 276–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steward DV (1981) The design structure matrix: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28(3): 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK

    Brendan O’Donovan, Claudia Eckert MSc, PhD (Senior Research Associate and assistant director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre) & John Clarkson MA, PhD, MIEE, CEng (Reader in Engineering Design and director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre)

  2. Department of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management, M.J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Texas, USA

    Tyson R Browning (Professor of Enterprise Operations)

Authors
  1. Brendan O’Donovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Eckert MSc, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Clarkson MA, PhD, MIEE, CEng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tyson R Browning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK

    John Clarkson MA, PhD, MIEE, CEng (Reader in Engineering Design and director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre) & Claudia Eckert MSc, PhD (Senior Research Associate and assistant director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre) (Reader in Engineering Design and director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre) &  (Senior Research Associate and assistant director of the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Donovan, B., Eckert, C., Clarkson, J., Browning, T.R. (2005). Design planning and modelling. In: Clarkson, J., Eckert, C. (eds) Design process improvement. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-061-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-701-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-061-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation