Abstract
Geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) concepts and technologies are used extensively in modern water resources engineering planning, design, and operations practice and are changing the way these activities are accomplished. GIS has become an increasingly important means for understanding and dealing with the pressing problems of water and related resources management in our world. GIS concepts and technologies help us collect and organize the data about such problems and understand their spatial relationships. GIS analysis capabilities provide ways for modeling and synthesizing information that contribute to supporting decisions for resource management across a large range of scales, from local to global. And GIS provides a means for visualizing resource characteristics and thereby enhancing understanding in support of decision-making. This chapter introduces GIS and RS and their application to water resources systems. A general overview of GIS is presented which is followed by summary review of GIS applications for modern water resources engineering.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ABR:
-
Average basin rainfall
- AMBER:
-
Areal mean basin effective rainfall
- API:
-
Application program interface
- ALERT:
-
Automated local evaluation in real time
- AML:
-
Arc macro language
- AMSR:
-
Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer
- CAD:
-
Computer-aided design
- CAPPI:
-
Constant altitude plan position indicator
- CASE:
-
Computer-aided software engineering
- CDSS:
-
Colorado Decision Support System
- CERL:
-
Construction Engineering Research Lab (US Army Corps of Engineers)
- CRWR:
-
Center for Research in Water Resources (Univ. Texas, Austin)
- CU:
-
Consumptive use
- CUAHSI:
-
Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science
- CWCB:
-
Colorado Water Conservation Board
- DBMS:
-
Database management system
- DCIA:
-
Directly connected impervious area
- DCP:
-
Data collection platform
- DCS:
-
Data Capture Standards (FEMA)
- DEM:
-
Digital elevation model
- DFIRM:
-
Digital flood insurance rate map
- DLG:
-
Digital line graph
- DMI:
-
Data management interface
- DOQQ:
-
Digital Orthoimagery Quarter Quadrangles
- DPA:
-
Digital precipitation array
- DSS:
-
Decision Support System
- DTM:
-
Digital terrain model
- EDNA:
-
Elevation derivatives for national applications
- EOS:
-
Earth observation satellite
- EPA:
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- ESRI:
-
Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
- ET:
-
Evapotranspiration
- ETM+:
-
Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus
- F2D:
-
Flood two-dimensional rainfall-runoff model
- FDA:
-
Flood damage analysis
- FEMA:
-
Federal Emergency Management Agency
- FFG:
-
Flash flood guidance
- FIRM:
-
Flood insurance rate map
- FIS:
-
Flood Insurance Studies
- FWPP:
-
Flood warning and preparedness program
- Geo-MODSIM:
-
GIS-based MODSIM (Modular Simulation program)
- GeoRAS:
-
Geospatial River Analysis System
- GIS:
-
Geographical Information System
- GLEAMS:
-
Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems
- GNIS:
-
Geographic Names Information System
- GOES:
-
Geostationary operational environmental satellite
- GPS:
-
Global positioning system
- GRASS:
-
Geographic Resources Analysis Support System
- GUI:
-
Graphical user interface
- HAS:
-
Hydrologic analysis and support
- HEC:
-
Hydrologic Engineering Center (US Army Corps of Engineers)
- HEC-RAS:
-
HEC River Analysis System
- HIS:
-
Hydrologic Information System
- HL-RMS:
-
Hydrology Lab—Research Modeling System (NWS)
- HMS:
-
Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC)
- HMT:
-
Hydrometeorological Testbed (NOAA)
- HRAP:
-
Hydrologic Rainfall Analysis Project
- HTML:
-
Hypertext markup language
- HTTP:
-
Hypertext transfer protocol
- HUC:
-
Hydrologic unit code
- LIDAR:
-
LIght detection and ranging
- LSM:
-
Land Surface Model
- LULC:
-
Land use–land cover
- MAP:
-
Mean areal precipitation
- MD:
-
Maximum day demand
- MH:
-
Maximum hour demand
- MODFLOW:
-
Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model
- MPE:
-
Multisensor precipitation estimator
- MRLC:
-
Multi-resolution Land Characteristics Consortium
- MSS:
-
Multispectral scanner
- NAIP:
-
National Agricultural Imagery Program
- NASA:
-
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA)
- NASIS:
-
National Soil Information System
- NDVI:
-
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
- NED:
-
National Elevation Dataset
- NFIP:
-
National Flood Insurance Program
- NESDIS:
-
National Environmental Satellite Data Information Service
- NEXRAD:
-
Next Generation Weather Radar
- NHD:
-
National Hydrography Dataset
- NLCD:
-
National Land Cover Dataset
- NLDAS:
-
North American Land Data Assimilation System
- NOAA:
-
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- NOHRSC:
-
National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center
- NRCS:
-
Natural Resources Conservation Service
- NRC:
-
National Research Council
- NSA:
-
National Snow Analyses
- NWS:
-
National Weather Service
- NWIS:
-
National Water Information System (USGS)
- OSD:
-
Official Soil Series Description
- PDSI:
-
Palmer Drought Severity Index
- PPS:
-
Precipitation processing system (radar)
- PRISM:
-
Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Slope Model
- QPE:
-
Quantitative precipitation estimate
- QPF:
-
Quantitative precipitation forecast
- RDBMS:
-
Relational Database Management System
- RFC:
-
River Forecast Center (NWS)
- RGDSS:
-
Rio Grande Decision Support System
- SAC-SMA:
-
Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting
- SCADA:
-
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
- SDMS:
-
Spatial Data Management System
- SDSS:
-
Spatial Decision Support Systems
- SLAR:
-
Side-Looking Airborne Radar
- SMA:
-
Soil Moisture Accounting
- SQL:
-
Structured Query Language
- SSM/I:
-
Special Sensor Microwave/Imager
- SSURGO:
-
Soil Survey Geographic Database
- STATSCO:
-
State Soil Geographic Database
- STORET:
-
STOrage and RETrieval
- STP:
-
Storm total precipitation
- TIGER:
-
Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing
- TIN:
-
Triangulated Irregular Network
- TM:
-
Thematic Mapper
- UH:
-
Unit hydrograph
- UML:
-
Universal Modeling Language
- USBR:
-
United States Bureau of Reclamation
- USDA:
-
US Department of Agriculture
- USGS:
-
United States Geologic Survey
- UZFWM:
-
Upper-zone free water maximum
- WADISO:
-
Water Distribution System Analysis and Optimization
- WADSOP:
-
Water Distribution System Optimization
- XML:
-
Extensible Markup Language
References
Johnson LE (2009) Geographic information systems in water resources engineering. Taylor-Francis Group, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 978-1-4200-6913-6
Gugan DJ, Dowman IJ (1988) Accuracy and completeness of topographic mapping from SPOT imagery. Photogrammetric Record 12(72):787–796
Jensen JR (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN 0-13-205840-5
Hsu C, Johnson LE (2007) Multi-criteria wetlands mapping using an integrated pixel-based and object-based classification approach (with C. Hsu). Proceedings AWRA annual conference, Albuquerque, N.M., 12 Nov
Meijerink AMJ, Brouwe HAM, Mannaert CM, Valenzuel CR (1994) Introduction to the use of geographic information systems for practical hydrology. UNESCO international hydrological programme, Publication Number 23, 243 p
Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Martin PH, LeBoeuf EJ, Dobbins JP, Daniel EB, Abkowitz MD (2005) Interfacing GIS with water resource models: a state-of-the-art review. J American Water Resources Assoc 41(6):1471
Worboys MF, Duckham M (2004) GIS: a computing perspective, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 0415283752
Aronoff S (1991) GIS—a management perspective. WDL Publications, Ottawa. ISBN 0-921804-91-1
Perdue D (2006) National Hydrography Dataset—concepts and contents. US Geological Survey (http://nhd.usgs.gov/techref.html)
National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Integrating multiscale observations of U.S. Waters. Committee on integrated observations for hydrologic and related sciences. ISBN: 0-309-11455-1. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12060.html
Ragan RM, Jackson TJ (1980) Runoff synthesis using Landsat and the SCS model. J Hydraulics Div ASCE 106:3–14
Bondelid TR, McCuen RH, Jackson TJ (1982) Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation. American Water Resources Association. Water Resources Bulletin 18(1):111–116
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) (2006) Meteorological handbook No. 11—Doppler Radar Meteorological Observations, Part C, WSR-88D Products and Algorithms. FCM-H11C-2006. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/radar/radarresources.html
Garbrecht J, Martz LW (1999) TOPAZ: an automated digital landscape analysis tool for topographic evaluation, drainage identification, watershed segmentation and subcatchment parameterization; TOPAZ overview. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, Oklahoma, USA, ARS Publication No. GRL 99-1, April 1999, 26 pp
DeBerry P (ed) (1999) GIS modules and distributed models of the watershed. A report from the ASCE Task Committee. ASCE, Reston, VA. ISBN 0-7844-0443-7
Issacs EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (pbk). ISBN 0-19-505013-4
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) (2000) HEC-HMS hydrologic modeling system, technical reference manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE-HEC, Davis, CA, Mar. (http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/)
Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) (2003) Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension (HEC-GeoHMS). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE-HEC, Davis, CA, Dec. (http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-geohms/)
Kost JR, Kelly GG (2002) Watershed delineation using the National Elevation Dataset and semiautomated techniques. USGS Paper 0421. (http://edna.usgs.gov/Edna/pubs/p0421/p0421.html)
Smith M, Koren V, Zhang Z, Reed S, Seo DJ, Moreda F, Kuzmin V, Cui Z, Anderson R (2004) NOAA NWS distributed hydrologic modeling research and development. NOAA Technical Report NWS 45, April, 62 pp
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2005) Appendix N: data capture standards and guidelines. Guidelines and specifications for floodplain mapping partners. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/fhm/frm_gsana.pdf
Jones JL, Haluska TJ, Williamson AK, Erwin ML (1998) Updating flood maps efficiently: building on existing hydraulic information and modern elevation data with a GIS. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-200. http://wwwdwatcm.wr.usgs.gov/reports/floodgis/
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2003) Appendix L of the guidelines and specifications for flood floodplain mapping partners. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/fhm/frm_gsana.pdf
Pender G, Neelz S (2007) Use of computer models of flood inundation to facilitate communication in flood risk management. Environmental Hazards 7:106–114
Ackerman CT, Evans TA, Brunner GA (2000) HEC-GeoRAS: linking GIS to hydraulic analysis using ARC/INFO and HEC-RAS. In: Maidment DR, Djokic D (eds) Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA. ISBN 1-879102-80-3
Wu ZY, Wang RH, Diaz D, Walski T (2003) Mining water consumption and GIS-based data for loading water distribution models. ASCE World Water Congress 118:23
Prins JG, Bodeaux M (2000) Building land use plans for water master plans: a case study. ESRI User’s Conference, San Diego, CA
Jeppson RW (1982) Analysis of flow in pipe networks. Ann Arbor Science Inc, Ann Arbor, MI. ISBN 0-250-40119-3
Walski T (1984) Analysis of water distribution systems. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York
Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2 users manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 45268 Report EPA/600/R-00/057, Sep. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/epanet.html
Szana K (2006) Water distribution systems modeling and optimization in a GIS environment. Master’s project report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO, May
McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Book 6, Chapter A1, Denver, Colorado
Radin HA (2006) Using ArcGIS for preprocessing and postprocessing a Modflow-96 groundwater model. GIS and Water Resources IV, AWRA Spring Specialty Conference, May
Zeiler M (1999) Modeling our world—the ESRI guide to geodatabase design. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA. ISBN 1-879102-62-5
Maidment DR, Jones NL, Strassberg G (2004) Arc hydro groundwater geodatabase. Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, TX, https://webspace.utexas.edu/gstras/MyWebsite/publications/ArcHydroGWGeoDBFinalForReview.doc
Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) (2005) Rio Grande decision support system. http://cdss.state.co.us/DNN/
Rio Grande Decision Support System (RGDSS) (2005) Calibration of the Rio Grande Basin Groundwater Model. Report to the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver, CO
Rindahl B, Bennett R (2013) Design and implementation of a data-centered groundwater modeling system. Proceedings ESRI annual users conference. San Diego, CA. http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc00/professional/papers/PAP443/p443.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, L.E. (2014). GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in Modern Water Resources Engineering. In: Wang, L., Yang, C. (eds) Modern Water Resources Engineering. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 15. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-594-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-595-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)