Skip to main content

GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in Modern Water Resources Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Water Resources Engineering

Part of the book series: Handbook of Environmental Engineering ((HEE,volume 15))

  • 4014 Accesses

Abstract

Geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) concepts and technologies are used extensively in modern water resources engineering planning, design, and operations practice and are changing the way these activities are accomplished. GIS has become an increasingly important means for understanding and dealing with the pressing problems of water and related resources management in our world. GIS concepts and technologies help us collect and organize the data about such problems and understand their spatial relationships. GIS analysis capabilities provide ways for modeling and synthesizing information that contribute to supporting decisions for resource management across a large range of scales, from local to global. And GIS provides a means for visualizing resource characteristics and thereby enhancing understanding in support of decision-making. This chapter introduces GIS and RS and their application to water resources systems. A general overview of GIS is presented which is followed by summary review of GIS applications for modern water resources engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ABR:

Average basin rainfall

AMBER:

Areal mean basin effective rainfall

API:

Application program interface

ALERT:

Automated local evaluation in real time

AML:

Arc macro language

AMSR:

Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer

CAD:

Computer-aided design

CAPPI:

Constant altitude plan position indicator

CASE:

Computer-aided software engineering

CDSS:

Colorado Decision Support System

CERL:

Construction Engineering Research Lab (US Army Corps of Engineers)

CRWR:

Center for Research in Water Resources (Univ. Texas, Austin)

CU:

Consumptive use

CUAHSI:

Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science

CWCB:

Colorado Water Conservation Board

DBMS:

Database management system

DCIA:

Directly connected impervious area

DCP:

Data collection platform

DCS:

Data Capture Standards (FEMA)

DEM:

Digital elevation model

DFIRM:

Digital flood insurance rate map

DLG:

Digital line graph

DMI:

Data management interface

DOQQ:

Digital Orthoimagery Quarter Quadrangles

DPA:

Digital precipitation array

DSS:

Decision Support System

DTM:

Digital terrain model

EDNA:

Elevation derivatives for national applications

EOS:

Earth observation satellite

EPA:

Environmental Protection Agency

ESRI:

Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.

ET:

Evapotranspiration

ETM+:

Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus

F2D:

Flood two-dimensional rainfall-runoff model

FDA:

Flood damage analysis

FEMA:

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FFG:

Flash flood guidance

FIRM:

Flood insurance rate map

FIS:

Flood Insurance Studies

FWPP:

Flood warning and preparedness program

Geo-MODSIM:

GIS-based MODSIM (Modular Simulation program)

GeoRAS:

Geospatial River Analysis System

GIS:

Geographical Information System

GLEAMS:

Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems

GNIS:

Geographic Names Information System

GOES:

Geostationary operational environmental satellite

GPS:

Global positioning system

GRASS:

Geographic Resources Analysis Support System

GUI:

Graphical user interface

HAS:

Hydrologic analysis and support

HEC:

Hydrologic Engineering Center (US Army Corps of Engineers)

HEC-RAS:

HEC River Analysis System

HIS:

Hydrologic Information System

HL-RMS:

Hydrology Lab—Research Modeling System (NWS)

HMS:

Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC)

HMT:

Hydrometeorological Testbed (NOAA)

HRAP:

Hydrologic Rainfall Analysis Project

HTML:

Hypertext markup language

HTTP:

Hypertext transfer protocol

HUC:

Hydrologic unit code

LIDAR:

LIght detection and ranging

LSM:

Land Surface Model

LULC:

Land use–land cover

MAP:

Mean areal precipitation

MD:

Maximum day demand

MH:

Maximum hour demand

MODFLOW:

Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model

MPE:

Multisensor precipitation estimator

MRLC:

Multi-resolution Land Characteristics Consortium

MSS:

Multispectral scanner

NAIP:

National Agricultural Imagery Program

NASA:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USA)

NASIS:

National Soil Information System

NDVI:

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

NED:

National Elevation Dataset

NFIP:

National Flood Insurance Program

NESDIS:

National Environmental Satellite Data Information Service

NEXRAD:

Next Generation Weather Radar

NHD:

National Hydrography Dataset

NLCD:

National Land Cover Dataset

NLDAS:

North American Land Data Assimilation System

NOAA:

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NOHRSC:

National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center

NRCS:

Natural Resources Conservation Service

NRC:

National Research Council

NSA:

National Snow Analyses

NWS:

National Weather Service

NWIS:

National Water Information System (USGS)

OSD:

Official Soil Series Description

PDSI:

Palmer Drought Severity Index

PPS:

Precipitation processing system (radar)

PRISM:

Parameter-Elevation Regressions on Slope Model

QPE:

Quantitative precipitation estimate

QPF:

Quantitative precipitation forecast

RDBMS:

Relational Database Management System

RFC:

River Forecast Center (NWS)

RGDSS:

Rio Grande Decision Support System

SAC-SMA:

Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting

SCADA:

Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

SDMS:

Spatial Data Management System

SDSS:

Spatial Decision Support Systems

SLAR:

Side-Looking Airborne Radar

SMA:

Soil Moisture Accounting

SQL:

Structured Query Language

SSM/I:

Special Sensor Microwave/Imager

SSURGO:

Soil Survey Geographic Database

STATSCO:

State Soil Geographic Database

STORET:

STOrage and RETrieval

STP:

Storm total precipitation

TIGER:

Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing

TIN:

Triangulated Irregular Network

TM:

Thematic Mapper

UH:

Unit hydrograph

UML:

Universal Modeling Language

USBR:

United States Bureau of Reclamation

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

USGS:

United States Geologic Survey

UZFWM:

Upper-zone free water maximum

WADISO:

Water Distribution System Analysis and Optimization

WADSOP:

Water Distribution System Optimization

XML:

Extensible Markup Language

References

  1. Johnson LE (2009) Geographic information systems in water resources engineering. Taylor-Francis Group, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 978-1-4200-6913-6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gugan DJ, Dowman IJ (1988) Accuracy and completeness of topographic mapping from SPOT imagery. Photogrammetric Record 12(72):787–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen JR (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN 0-13-205840-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu C, Johnson LE (2007) Multi-criteria wetlands mapping using an integrated pixel-based and object-based classification approach (with C. Hsu). Proceedings AWRA annual conference, Albuquerque, N.M., 12 Nov

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meijerink AMJ, Brouwe HAM, Mannaert CM, Valenzuel CR (1994) Introduction to the use of geographic information systems for practical hydrology. UNESCO international hydrological programme, Publication Number 23, 243 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin PH, LeBoeuf EJ, Dobbins JP, Daniel EB, Abkowitz MD (2005) Interfacing GIS with water resource models: a state-of-the-art review. J American Water Resources Assoc 41(6):1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Worboys MF, Duckham M (2004) GIS: a computing perspective, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN 0415283752

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aronoff S (1991) GIS—a management perspective. WDL Publications, Ottawa. ISBN 0-921804-91-1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Perdue D (2006) National Hydrography Dataset—concepts and contents. US Geological Survey (http://nhd.usgs.gov/techref.html)

  11. National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Integrating multiscale observations of U.S. Waters. Committee on integrated observations for hydrologic and related sciences. ISBN: 0-309-11455-1. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12060.html

  12. Ragan RM, Jackson TJ (1980) Runoff synthesis using Landsat and the SCS model. J Hydraulics Div ASCE 106:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bondelid TR, McCuen RH, Jackson TJ (1982) Sensitivity of SCS models to curve number variation. American Water Resources Association. Water Resources Bulletin 18(1):111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (OFCM) (2006) Meteorological handbook No. 11—Doppler Radar Meteorological Observations, Part C, WSR-88D Products and Algorithms. FCM-H11C-2006. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/radar/radarresources.html

  15. Garbrecht J, Martz LW (1999) TOPAZ: an automated digital landscape analysis tool for topographic evaluation, drainage identification, watershed segmentation and subcatchment parameterization; TOPAZ overview. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, Oklahoma, USA, ARS Publication No. GRL 99-1, April 1999, 26 pp

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeBerry P (ed) (1999) GIS modules and distributed models of the watershed. A report from the ASCE Task Committee. ASCE, Reston, VA. ISBN 0-7844-0443-7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Issacs EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (pbk). ISBN 0-19-505013-4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) (2000) HEC-HMS hydrologic modeling system, technical reference manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE-HEC, Davis, CA, Mar. (http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/)

  19. Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) (2003) Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension (HEC-GeoHMS). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE-HEC, Davis, CA, Dec. (http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-geohms/)

  20. Kost JR, Kelly GG (2002) Watershed delineation using the National Elevation Dataset and semiautomated techniques. USGS Paper 0421. (http://edna.usgs.gov/Edna/pubs/p0421/p0421.html)

  21. Smith M, Koren V, Zhang Z, Reed S, Seo DJ, Moreda F, Kuzmin V, Cui Z, Anderson R (2004) NOAA NWS distributed hydrologic modeling research and development. NOAA Technical Report NWS 45, April, 62 pp

    Google Scholar 

  22. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2005) Appendix N: data capture standards and guidelines. Guidelines and specifications for floodplain mapping partners. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/fhm/frm_gsana.pdf

  23. Jones JL, Haluska TJ, Williamson AK, Erwin ML (1998) Updating flood maps efficiently: building on existing hydraulic information and modern elevation data with a GIS. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-200. http://wwwdwatcm.wr.usgs.gov/reports/floodgis/

  24. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (2003) Appendix L of the guidelines and specifications for flood floodplain mapping partners. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/fhm/frm_gsana.pdf

  25. Pender G, Neelz S (2007) Use of computer models of flood inundation to facilitate communication in flood risk management. Environmental Hazards 7:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ackerman CT, Evans TA, Brunner GA (2000) HEC-GeoRAS: linking GIS to hydraulic analysis using ARC/INFO and HEC-RAS. In: Maidment DR, Djokic D (eds) Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA. ISBN 1-879102-80-3

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu ZY, Wang RH, Diaz D, Walski T (2003) Mining water consumption and GIS-based data for loading water distribution models. ASCE World Water Congress 118:23

    Google Scholar 

  28. Prins JG, Bodeaux M (2000) Building land use plans for water master plans: a case study. ESRI User’s Conference, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jeppson RW (1982) Analysis of flow in pipe networks. Ann Arbor Science Inc, Ann Arbor, MI. ISBN 0-250-40119-3

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walski T (1984) Analysis of water distribution systems. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2 users manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 45268 Report EPA/600/R-00/057, Sep. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/epanet.html

  32. Szana K (2006) Water distribution systems modeling and optimization in a GIS environment. Master’s project report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO, May

    Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Book 6, Chapter A1, Denver, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  34. Radin HA (2006) Using ArcGIS for preprocessing and postprocessing a Modflow-96 groundwater model. GIS and Water Resources IV, AWRA Spring Specialty Conference, May

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zeiler M (1999) Modeling our world—the ESRI guide to geodatabase design. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA. ISBN 1-879102-62-5

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maidment DR, Jones NL, Strassberg G (2004) Arc hydro groundwater geodatabase. Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, TX, https://webspace.utexas.edu/gstras/MyWebsite/publications/ArcHydroGWGeoDBFinalForReview.doc

    Google Scholar 

  37. Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) (2005) Rio Grande decision support system. http://cdss.state.co.us/DNN/

  38. Rio Grande Decision Support System (RGDSS) (2005) Calibration of the Rio Grande Basin Groundwater Model. Report to the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Denver, CO

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rindahl B, Bennett R (2013) Design and implementation of a data-centered groundwater modeling system. Proceedings ESRI annual users conference. San Diego, CA. http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc00/professional/papers/PAP443/p443.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, L.E. (2014). GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in Modern Water Resources Engineering. In: Wang, L., Yang, C. (eds) Modern Water Resources Engineering. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 15. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-595-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics