Abstract
Libido has always been associated with sexual motivation. The Latin root refers specifically to sexual lust, a term that conjures images of highly motivated behavior. Libido is observed in the strength of desire and responding toward a sexual incentive, and therefore can be regarded as a conscious reflection of sexual motivation, which we define here as the energizing force that generates our level of sexual interest at any given time. It drives our sexual fantasies, compels us to seek out and evaluate sexual incentives, regulates our levels of sexual arousal and desire, and enables us to masturbate, copulate, or engage in other forms of sex play. Although sexual motivation is often viewed as an internal process built upon neuroendocrine mechanisms, such as alterations in brain neurochemical function set forth by steroid hormone actions, it is also modulated by experiences and expectations, learned patterns of behavior and underlying neural activity related to sexual arousal, desire, reward, and inhibition. In turn, these aspects of sexual function feed back on mechanisms of motivation, either to increase (as in the case of arousal, desire, or reward, Fig. 3.1a) or decrease (as in the case of reward or inhibition, Fig. 3.1b) the expression of sexual interest or libido. Delineating the neural mechanisms that underlie these aspects of sexual function has been the focus of recent research in animals and humans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Crenshaw TL, Goldberg JP. Sexual pharmacology. New York: Norton; 1996.
Miller RA. The magical and ritual use of Aphrodesiacs. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books; 1993.
Rowland DL, Cooper SE, Slob AK. Genital and psychoaffective response to erotic stimlation in sexually functional and dysfunctional men. J Abnorm Psychol. 1996;105:194–203.
Meston CM, Gorzalka BB. The effects of immediate, delayed, and residual sympathetic activation on sexual arousal in women. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:143–8.
Meston CM, Heiman JR. Ephedrine-activated physiological sexual arousal in women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:652–6.
Meisel RL, Sachs BD. The physiology of male sexual behavior. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The physiology of reproduction. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1994. p. 3–105.
McKenna K. Central nervous system pathways involved in the control of penile erection. Annu Rev Sex Behav. 1999;10:157–83.
Hull EM, Eaton RC, Markowski VP, Moses J, Lumley LA, Loucks JA. Opposite influence of medial preoptic D1 and D2 receptors on genital reflexes: implications for copulation. Life Sci. 1992;51:1705–13.
Diamond LE, Earle DC, Rosen RC, Willett MS, Molinoff PB. Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetic properties, and pharmacodynamic effects of intranasal PT-141, a melanocortin receptor agonist, in healthy males and patients with mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:51–9.
Sachs BD, Akasofu K, Citron JH, Daniels SB, Natoli JH. Noncontract stimulation from estrous females evokes penile erection in rats. Physiol Behav. 1994;55:1073–9.
Sachs BD. Contextual approaches to the physiology and classification of erectile function, erectile dysfunction, and sexual arousal. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:541–60.
Pehek EA, Thompson JT, Eaton RC, Bazzett TJ, Hull EM. Apomorphine and haloperidol, but not domperidone, affect penile reflexes in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988;31:201–8.
Stoleru S, Gregoire MC, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav. 1999;28:1–21.
Redoute J, Stoleru S, Gregoire MC, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;11:162–77.
Bocher M, Chisin R, Parag Y, Freedman N, Meir Weil Y, Lester H, et al. Cerebral activation associated with sexual arousal in response to a pornographic clip: a 15O-H2O PET study in heterosexual men. Neuroimage. 2001;14:105–17.
Karama S, Lecours AR, Leroux JM, Bourgouin P, Beaudoin G, Joubert S, et al. Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic film clips. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;16:1–13.
Mouras H, Stoleru S, Bittoun J, Glutron D, Pelegrini-Issac M, Paradis AL, et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage. 2003;20:855–69.
Hamann S, Herman RA, Nolan CL, Wallen K. Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:411–6.
Stoleru S, Redoute J, Costes N, Lavenne F, Bars DL, Dechaud H, et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in men with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2003;124:67–86.
Pfaus JG, Heeb MM. Implications of immediate-early gene induction in the brain following sexual stimulation of female and male rodents. Brain Res Bull. 1997;44:397–407.
Traish AM, Kim NN, Munarriz R, Moreland R, Goldstein I. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms of female genital sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31:393–400.
Scepkowski LA, Georgescu M, Pfaus JG. NeuroÂendocrine factors in sexual desire and motivation. In: Goldstein I, Meston C, Davis K, Traish A, editors. Female sexual dysfunction. London: Parthenon; 2006.
Basson R, Brotto LA. Sexual psychophysiology and effects of sildenafil citrate in oestrogenised women with acquired genital arousal disorder and impaired orgasm: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obst Gyn. 2003;110:1014–24.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychiatric disorders IV-TR (text revision). Washington, DC: APA Press; 2000.
Basson R. Female sexual response: the role of drugs in the management of sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:350–3.
Toledano RR, Pfaus JG. The sexual arousal and desire inventory (SADI): a multidimensional scale to assess subjective sexual arousal and desire. J Sex Med. 2006;3:853–77.
Pfaus JG, Kippin TE, Coria-Avila G. What can animal models tell us about human sexual function? Annu Rev Sex Res. 2003;14:1–63.
Blackburn JR, Pfaus JG, Phillips AG. Dopamine functions in appetitive and defensive behaviours. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;39:247–79.
Pfaus JG, Phillips AG. Role of dopamine in anticipatory and consummatory aspects of sexual behavior in the male rat. Behav Neurosci. 1991;105:727–43.
Everitt BJ. Sexual motivation: a neural and behavioral analysis of the mechanisms underlying appetitive and copulatory responses of male rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1990;14:217–32.
Kippin TE, Cain SW, Pfaus JG. Estrous odors and sexually conditioned neutral odors activate separate neural pathways in the male rat. Neuroscience. 2003;117:971–9.
Pfaus JG, Shadiack A, Van Soest T, Tse M, Molinoff P. Selective facilitation of sexual solicitation in the female rat by a melanocortin agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10201–4.
Pfaus JG. Pathways of sexual desire. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1506–33.
Stanislaw H, Rice FJ. Correlation between sexual desire and menstrual cycle characteristics. Arch Sex Behav. 1988;17:499–508.
Ǻgmo A, Berenfeld R. Reinforcing properties of ejaculation in the male rat: the role of opioids and dopamine. Behav Neurosci. 1990;104:177–82.
Paredes RG, Martinez I. Naloxone blocks place preÂference conditioning after paced mating in female rats. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:117–27.
Coria-Avila GA, Solomon CE, Barbosa-Vargas E, Lemme I, Ryan R, Ménard S, et al. Neurochemical basis of conditioned partner preference in the female rat: 1. Disruption by naloxone. Behav Neurosci. 2008;122:385–95.
Ismail N, Girard-Bériault F, Nakanishi S, Pfaus JG. Naloxone, but not flupenthixol, disrupts the development of conditioned ejaculatory preference in the male rat. Behav Neurosci. 2009;123:992–9.
Ågmo A. Sexual motivation – an inquiry into events determining the occurrence of sexual behavior. Behav Brain Res. 1999;105:129–50.
Coria-Avila GA, Gavrila AS, Boulard B, Charron N, Stanley G, Pfaus JG. Neurochemical basis of conditioned partner preference in the female rat: II. Disruption by flupenthixol. Behav Neurosci. 2008;122:396–406.
Pfaus JG, Gorzalka BB. Opioids and sexual behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987;11:1–34.
Lorrain DS, Matuszewich L, Friedman RD, Hull EM. Extracellular serotonin in the lateral hypothalamic area is increased during the postejaculatory interval and impairs copulation in male rats. J Neurosci. 1997;17:9361–6.
Kippin TE, Sotiropoulos V, Badih J, Pfaus JG. Opposing roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior lateral hypothalamic area in the control of sexual behaviour in the male rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:698–704.
Carter CS, Witt DM, Thompson EG, Carlstead K. Effects of hormonal, sexual, and social history on mating and pair bonding in prairie voles. Physiol Behav. 1988;44:691–7.
Insel TR. A neurobiological basis of social attachment. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:726–35.
Lim MM, Wang Z, Olazabal DE, Ren X, Terwilliger EF, Young LJ. Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene. Nature. 2004;429:754–7.
Kippin TE, Talianakis S, Schattmann L, Bartholomew S, Pfaus JG. Olfactory conditioning of sexual behavior in the male rat. J Comp Psychol. 1998;112:389–99.
Coria-Avila G, Ouimet AJ, Pacheco P, Manzo J, Pfaus JG. Olfactory conditioned partner preference in the female rat. Behav Neurosci. 2005;119:716–25.
Holstege G, Georgiadis JR, Paans AM, Meiners LC, van der Graaf FH, Reinders AA. Brain activation during human male ejaculation. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9185–93.
Komisaruk BR, Whipple B, Crawford A, Liu WC, Kalnin A, Mosier K. Brain activation during vaginocervical self-stimulation and orgasm in women with complete spinal cord injury: fMRI evidence of mediation by the vagus nerves. Brain Res. 2004;1024:77–88.
Bancroft J, Janssen E. The dual control model of male sexual response: a theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24:571–9.
RodrĂguez-Manzo G. Blockade of the establishment of the sexual inhibition resulting from sexual exhaustion by the Coolidge effect. Behav Brain Res. 1999;100:245–54.
Pfaus JG, Wilkins MF. A novel environment disrupts copulation in sexually naĂ¯ve but not experienced male rats: reversal with naloxone. Physiol Behav. 1995;57:1045–9.
Fiorino DF, Phillips AG. Facilitation of sexual behavior in male rats following d- amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psychopharmacology. 1999;142:200–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfaus, J.G. (2011). Physiology of Libido. In: Mulhall, J., Incrocci, L., Goldstein, I., Rosen, R. (eds) Cancer and Sexual Health. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-916-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-916-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-915-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-916-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)