Skip to main content

Esophagus Carcinoma Surveillance Counterpoint: Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Oncology ((CCO))

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

The demographics of esophageal cancer in Australia reflect those of other Western countries [1] with a rising incidence in adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and esophago-gastric junction. However, in Western countries we still see patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic and cervical esophagus. The other change over the last 20 years has been an evolution of the use of the combination of chemotherapy with radiation therapy in the management of patients with esophageal cancer. Traditionally, resection was the definitive curative therapy, with radiation therapy used for patients who were not medically fit or who refused resection. However, the combination of chemoradiation therapy without resection was shown to offer a greater potential for cure for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, when compared with radiation therapy alone [2]. Thus, the recent trend has been to use concurrent chemoradiation therapy as definitive treatment or as neoadjuvant therapy for those patients having a resection [3, 4]. Recently, two randomized studies have supported the use of definitive chemoradiation therapy instead of esophageal resection in medically fit patients with squamous cell carcinoma [5, 6]. The role for definitive chemoradiation therapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is not clear, as most trials have had a predominance of squamous cell carcinoma. At this time the gold standard is still resection for locally advanced disease with the use of preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy, given the survival benefits shown in meta-analyses [7]. There are some data to suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy results in downstaging and improves resectability [8, 9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pohl H, Welch G. The role of over-diagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:142–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Herskovic A, Martz K, Al-Sarraf MV, et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the oesophagus. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1593–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geh JI. The use of chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:300–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geh JI, Crellen AM, Glynne-Jones R. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88: 338–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N, et al. Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chui P, Chan A, Leung S, et al. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing standard esophagectomy with chemoradiotherapy for treatment of squamous oesophageal cancer: early results from the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE). J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:794–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers BM, et al. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:226–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burmeister B, Smithers BM, Thomas J, et al. A randomized phase II trial comparing pre-operative chemotherapy with pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for localised carcinoma of the oesophagus. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:354–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, et al. Phase II comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:851–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baxi SN, Burmeister B, Harvey JA, et al. Salvage definitive chemo-radiotherapy for locally recurrent oesophageal carcinoma after primary surgery; retrospective review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smithers BM, Cullinan M, Thomas JM, et al. Outcomes from salvage esophagectomy post definitive chemoradiotherapy compared with resection following preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, et al. A randomised phase III study comparing surgery alone with chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery for resectable carcinoma of the oesophagus: an intergroup study of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:659–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Conroy T, Marchal F, Blazeby JM. Quality of life in patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: an overview. Oncology. 2006;70:391–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallas CN, Patel N, Oo A, et al. Five-year survival following oesophageal cancer resection: psychological functioning and quality of life. Psychol Health Med. 2001;6:684–94.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Esophageal Cancer: Version 1. Available: http://www.nccn.org (2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Mark Smithers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Humana Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smithers, B.M., Thomas, J.M., Burmeister, B.H. (2013). Esophagus Carcinoma Surveillance Counterpoint: Australia. In: Johnson, F., et al. Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-969-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics