Skip to main content

Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Neuromuscular Disease

Abstract

The clinical decision-making process is based on probability. Based on certain clinical information such as risk factors, family history, and findings on physical examination, the clinician obtains some estimate of the probability of disease (the pretest probability). Diagnostic tests are performed in order to improve the estimate of this probability. If the test is negative, the probability of disease should fall and if the test is positive, then the probability of the disease should rise. Useful diagnostic tests will produce marked shifts in the probability of disease based on whether the results of the test are positive or negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reid M, Lachs M, Feinstein A. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274:645–651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. England J, Gronseth G, Franklin G, et al. Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: A definition for clinical research: Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2005;64:199–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Br Med J 2003;326:41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Lijmer J. Diagnostic tests. In: (Guyatt G, Rennie D, eds.) User’s Guide to the Medical Literature. A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. American Medical Association Press, Chicago: 2002:121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett D. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994;271:703–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benatar, M. (2006). Diagnosis. In: Benatar, M. (eds) Neuromuscular Disease. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-106-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-106-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-627-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-106-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics