Skip to main content

Centrifugation Clarification and Thickening

  • Chapter
Biosolids Treatment Processes

Abstract

Since 1920, centrifuges have been employed in the US wastewater treatment industry. However, the early centrifuges did not perform well because of their complex design and poor mechanical reliability. In the early 1960s, a number of innovative designs were developed, which solved most of the operational problems. Sludge dewatering or thickening, and disposal of the residual solids, are significant costs of the waste treatment operation. These steps are especially important if the final disposal option is incineration. The incinerator will be more efficient if more water is removed prior to incineration. If the sludge has to be transported to a landfill, volume reduction owing to dewatering will significantly improve the overall economics (149). The sludge concentration methods of clarification, filtration, settling, flocculation, thickening, and centrifugation were evaluated. The choice of a dewatering technique is based on the feedstock, device design and function, and engineering specifications dependent on the intended outlook of the final products (4748). Filter belt presses, solid-bowl centrifuges, and membrane filter presses were analyzed for their ability to dewater sludge according to their capacity, polymer consumption of dewatered dry solids, suspend solids in the reject water, and economics (49).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. L. McCabe and J. C. Smith, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, McGraw Hill Book Co., NY, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. C. Lavanchy and F. W. Keith Jr., Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 5, 194–231 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. US EPA, Dewatering Municipal Waste Water Sludges Design Manual, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 625/1-82-014, October 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. F. Trawinski, Current liquid-solid separation technology. Filtr. Sep. 17(4), 326–335 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. H. S. Muralidahara, D. Ensminger, and A. Putnam, Acoustic dewatering and drying, Drying Technol. 3(4), 529–566 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. C. Zettelemoyer, F. J. Micale, and L. R. Dole, Surface Properties of Hydrogels Resulting from Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Effluents, Part II, Technical Bulletin No. 225, December, 1968, NCASI, NY, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. E. Albertson and E. E. Guidi Jr., Centrifugation of waste sludges. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 41(2), (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. B. Purchas, Solid/Liquid Separation Technology. Upland Press Ltd., NY, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Svarovsky, Centrifugal Separation in Solid/Liquid Separation. L. Svarovsky, (ed.), Butterworths, Inc., NY, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Wankoff, T. Laultta, and R. Shah, Evaluation of high and low-speed centrifuges. JWPCF 53(11), 1568–1573 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Moir, High speed decanter centrifuges upgrade coal preparation plant. Mining Magazine 160–163, February 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. US EPA, Summary Report: Pilot Plant Studies on Dewatering Primary Digested Sludge, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 670/2-73-043, August 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Wright, High-speed, high gravity, Coal Age, 60–65, April 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. A. Vesilind, Scaleup of solid bowl centrifuge performance. J. Environ. Eng. Div. Pro. ASCE 100, 479 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. WPCF, Sludge Dewatering, Material of Practice 20, Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. R. Amberg, Sludge dewatering and disposal in the pulp and paper industry, J WPCF 56(8), 962–969 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. NCASI, Pulp and Papermill Sludges in Maine: A Characterization Study. NCASI Technical Bulletin 447. NCASI, New York, NY, November, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. US EPA, Design Considerations for Pulp and Paper Mill Sludge Landfills. EPA-600/3-76-111, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, December, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. NCASI, A Compilation of Data on the Nature and Performance of Waste Water Management Systems in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Special Report No. 83-09, NCASI, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. T. Moll, Centrifugal dewatering of secondary activated sludge and secondary fibre streams, TAPP1, October 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  21. US EPA, Design Considerations for Pulp and Paper Mill Sludge Landfills, EPA-600/3-76-111, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, December 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. W. Gehm, Current Developments in the Dewatering of Papermill Sludges, Technical Bulletin No. 113, March 1959, NCASI, New York, NY, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  23. US EPA, Environmental Pollution Control Alternative, Economics of Waste Water Treatment Alternatives for the Electroplating Industry, EPA 625/5-79-016. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. US EPA, Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry. Ion Exchange, US EPA 625/8-81-007. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  25. US EPA, Control and Treatment Technology for the Metal Finishing Industry In-Plant Changes. US EPA 625/8-81-007. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Editor, Plate and surface finish, Sludge Management, 69(80), 48–50 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. US EPA, Environmental Pollution Control Alternatives, Sludge Handling, Dewatering and Disposal Alternatives for Metal Finishing Industry, EPA 625/5-82-018, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, October, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. W. Crain, Solids Removal and Concentration in US, EPA and American Electroplaters Society. EPA 600/2-81-028, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, February, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Green, Dewatering coal and refuse, Coal Age 86, 145–157 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. J. Wakeman, Residual saturation and dewatering of fine coals and filter cakes. Powder Technol. 40, 53–63 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. L. S. Rubin, Centrifuge Dewatering of Fine Coal Refuse, AIME, NY, March, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. S. Orphanos, Pollution Reduction and Product Recovery by Centrifugal Dewatering. AIME, NY, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. W. King, Performance of the McNally Wedag Horizontal Vibratory Centrifuge for Dewatering of Fine Coal and Refuse. AIME, NY, October 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. A. Crocker, Evaluation of sludge dewatering alternative at a metallugical refinery. JWPCF 54(10), 1417–1424 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. L. A. Esvelt, H. H. Hart, and W. W. Heineman, Cannery waste biological sludge disposal as cattle feed. JWPCF 48(12), 2778–2790 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M. Zeigler and R. F. Ellis, Improved dewatering procedures saves $65,000 in operations costs. Food Processing 98–100 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  37. N. P. Cheremisinoff and D. S. Azbel, (eds.), Filtr. Ann Arbor Sci. MI, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. A. Schweitzer, Handbook of Separation, McGraw Hill Book Co. NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. G. Moyers Jr., How to approach centrifugation problem. Chem. Eng. 73, 182–189 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. J. E. Flood, H. F. Porter, and F. W. Rennie, Centrifugation Equipment, 73, 190–193 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Gasper, Selection of equipment of dewatering sewage sludge. Filtr. Sep. 16, 23 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. H. F. Liu and B. G. Liptak, Wastewater Treatment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, LA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. WEF, Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. WEF Manual of Practice No. 8, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  44. WEF, Odor Control in Wastewater Treatment Plants. WEF Manual of Practice No. 82, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  45. WEF, Operation of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, Operations and Maintenance Subcommittee 1990, Vol. 11, pp. 444–451.

    Google Scholar 

  46. NTIS, Sludge Dewatering: Sewage and Industrial Wastes. PB 94-853744/XAB, US Department of Commerce, NTIS, Springfield, VA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  47. US EPA, Guidance for Writing Permits for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge. NTIS PB 93-217537/XAB, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  48. NTIS, Preliminary Review of Energy Considerations in Dewatering and Drying Sewage Sludge to Produce a Fuel. NTIS DE93504789/XAB, US Dept of Commerce, NTIS, Springfield, VA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  49. I. Andreasen, A comparative study of full-scale sludge dewatering equipment. Water Sci. Technol. (G. B.), 28, 37 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  50. P. A. Vesilind, The role of water in sludge dewatering. Water Environ. Res. 66, 4 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. D. J. Lee, Measurement of bound water in waste activated sludge: use of centrifugal settling method. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 61, 139 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. M. Wunsch and R. Otte-Witte, Effects of polymer dosage on alum sludge dewatering characteristics and physical properties. Aspects 122, 89 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  53. W. S. M’Coy, R. P. Dominak, A. J. Blanc, and N. O. Rodzianko, High solids centrifuge dewatering of thermally—conditioned wastewater solids. Proceeding Conference. Water Residuals Biosolids Manage: Approaching the Year 2000, Water Environment Federation, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  54. R. S. Burd, A Study of Sludge Handling and Disposal, Publication WP-20-4, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Washington, DC, May 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  55. J. H. Jenks, Continuous centrifuge used to dewater variety of sludges. Waste Eng. 360–361 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  56. R. F. Weston, Inc., Process Design Manual for Upgrading Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  57. US EPA, Sludge Handling and Disposal, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  58. W. F. White and T. E. Burns, Continuous centrifugal treatment of sewage sludge, Water Sewage Works 109, 84–386 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  59. US Army, Engineering and Design—Design of Wastewater Treatment Facilities Major Systems. Engineering Manual No. 1110-2-501. US Army, Washington, DC, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Editor, Chemical engineering. Equipment Indices, McGraw-Hill Publishing, NY, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Editor, Engineering News Record. ENR Cost Indices, McGraw-Hill Publishing, NY, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Editor, Economic indicators. Chem. Eng. 107, 410 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. C. Wang, D. B. Aulenbach, and L. K. Wang, Energy models and cost models for water pollution controls. In Clean Production, K. B. Misra, (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 685–720, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  64. L. K. Wang, N. C. Pereira, and Y. T. Hung, (eds.), Advanced Air and Noise Pollution Control. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  65. US ACE, Civil Works Construction Cost Index System Manual No. 1110-2-1304, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, 2003, 44 p (PDF file is available on the Internet; 2000-Tables Revised 31 March 2003 at http://www.nww.usace.army.mil/cost).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bates College, Centrifugation Basics. Department of Biology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME, abacus.bates.edu, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Texas A&M, Centrifugation. Natural Toxins Research Institute, Texas A&M University, Kingsville, TX, http://www.ntri.tamuk.edu p. 15, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  68. I. S. Turovskiy and P. K. Mathai, Wastewater Sludge Processing, John Wiley and Sons, NY, Section 3.3.3., 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  69. L. K. Wang, Y. T. Hung, H. H. Lo, and C. Yapijakis (eds.) Waste Treatment in the Food Processing Industry. pp. 120–122. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  70. L. K. Wang, Y. T. Hung, H. H. Lo, and C. Yapijakis (eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Treatment. CRC Press/Marcel Dekker, NY, p. 1322, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, L.K., Chang, SY., Hung, YT., Muralidhara, H.S., Chauhan, S.P. (2007). Centrifugation Clarification and Thickening. In: Wang, L.K., Shammas, N.K., Hung, YT. (eds) Biosolids Treatment Processes. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 6. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-996-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics