Skip to main content

Abstract

Pressure filter presses are used to remove water from liquid wastewater residuals and produce a nonliquid material referred to as “cake.” Dewatered cake varies in consistency from that of custard (12–15% solids) to moist soil (20–40% solids) (1). Filter presses for dewatering were first developed for industrial applications and, until the development of diaphragm presses, were only slightly modified for municipal applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. US EPA, Recessed-Plate Filter Press-Biosolids Technology Fact Sheet, EPA 832-F-00-058, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, September, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. US EPA, Dewatering Municipal Wastewater Sludges Design Manual, EPA/625/1-87-014, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development Washington and Center for Environmental Research Information, Cincinnati, OH, September, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Kemp, Just the facts on dewatering systems: A review of the features of three mechanical dewatering technologies, Water Environ. and Technol. pp. 1023–1046, December, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. US EPA, Sludge Handling and Conditioning Operations Manual, EPA/430/9-78/002, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Program Operations, Municipal Operations Branch, Washington, DC, February, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. J. A. Coopmans, H. P. Schwarz, and M. J. Pryor, The dewatering of a mining sludge containing hexavalent chromium using a tubular filter press-a South African development, Water Supply, 1(5–6), 371–376 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. E. Rencken, D. J. Mullan, and C. A. Buckley, Modeling of the Tubular Filter Press Process, Republic of South Africa, http://www.und.ac.za/und/prg/posters/daveabs.html(2006).

  7. WEF, Operation and Maintenance of Sludge Dewatering Systems, Manual of Practice No. OM-8, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. WEF, Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, Manual of Practice No. 8, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. UEE Industries & Analytical Laboratory Consultants Ltd, Sample Filter Press-22 L Batch Filter for Bench Studies Unit Electrical Engineering Ltd., http://www.uee.com/products/lab_fpress.htm(2006)

  10. US ACE, Design: Plate and Frame Filter Press-Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), UFC 3-280-03, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, pp. 136, July 23, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. L. Christensen, Communication, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55(4), 417–419 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. S. Gale, Filtration theory with special reference to sewage sludge, Water Pollut. Control (GB) 66, 662 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. S-Ber. Kozeny, Weiner Akad., ABTA IIa, 136, 271 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. C. Carmen, J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 57, 225 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Coackley, Laboratory scale filtration experiments and their application to sewage sludge dewatering. In: Biological Treatment of Sewage and Industrial Wastes, Vol. II, McCabe and Eckenfelder (eds.), Reinhold Publishing, New York, NY, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Mininni, L. Spinosa, and A. Misiti, Evaluation of filter press performance for sludge dewatering, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 56(4), 331–336 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J. H. Wilhelm, The use of specific resistance data in sizing batch-type pressure filters, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50(3), 471–483 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. G. L. Christensen and J. R. Sipe, The application of sludge filtration models to media selection, Proceeding of the 14th Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference, 571–579. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. F. Notebaert, D. A. Wilms, and A. A. Van Haute, A new deduction with a larger application of the specific resistance to filtration of sludges, Water Res. 9, 667 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. J. Greenwood and W. Maier, Computer Simulations and Process Studies of Pressure Filtration for Sludge Dewatering, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission of the Twin Cities Area, and the Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Minnesota (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. R. Baker and T. Johnston, Lime Addition Does More Than Stabilize Biosolids, Biosolids Technical Bulletin, Water Environment Federation, September (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. D. Garvey and T. Ferrero, Lime Conditioning Produces Exceptional Quality Biosolids, Biosolids Technical Bulletin, Water Environment Federation, September (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. J. Webb, A study of conditioning sewage sludges with lime, Water Pollut. Control (GB), 73, 192 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Sontheimer, Effects of sludge conditioning with lime on dewatering, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advances in Water Pollution Research, Munich, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. L. Christensen and D. A. Stule, Chemical reactions affecting filterability in iron-lime sludge conditioning, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 51(10), 2499–2512 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. US EPA, Process Design Manual for sludge Treatment and Disposal, EPA625/1-79-001, US Environmental Protection Agency, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  27. RMS Enviro Solv Inc., Pitbull Sludge and Filter-Press Pumps, http://www.process-controls.com/RMS_EnviroSolv/pitbull_models_F3.htmJanuary 29 (2005).

  28. The Flo Trend ® Systems Power Pak® Filter presses, http://www.flotrend.com/powerpak.html(2006).

  29. Beckart Environmental, Inc., http://www.beckart.com(2004).

  30. Komline-Sanders, K-S Avery Automated Filter Press, http://www.komline.com/Products_Services/Filtration/KSAvery.html(2006).

  31. Hoffland Environmental Inc., Wastewater Treatment Systems-Filter Presses, http://www.hofflandenv.com/src/el/6.xml (2002).

  32. USFilter Corporation, What is a Filter Press? http://www.usfilter.com (2006).

  33. NEETC, Plate and Frame Filter Press, IMCO Process Equipment Technology Safety Data Sheet (TSDS), National Environmental Education and Training Center, Inc., http://www.neetc.iup.edu/safety/tsds/tsds_docs/plate_and_frame_filter_press.html (2001).

  34. Y. C. Wu, E. D. Smith, and R. Novak, Filterability of activated sludge in response to growth conditions, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 54(5), 444–456 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Terraqua Resources Corp., Filter Press Operations Survey for the City of Baltimore, MD Terraqua Resources Corporation, Philadelphia, PA. Engineering Report. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. T. Ohara, S. K. Raksit, and D. R. Olson, Sludge dewatering studies at Hyperion Treatment Plant, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 50(5), 912–925 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. E. R. Bennett, D. A. Rein, and K. D. Lisntedt, Economic aspects of sludge dewatering and disposal, J. Environ. Eng. Division ASCE 99, 55 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  38. US ACE, Civil Works Construction Cost Index System Manual, 110-2-1304, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2000-Tables Revised 31 March, Washington, DC, p. 44, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Manufacturers’ Catalogs: Avery, Westwood, NJ, Edwards & Jones, Belleville, NJ, Dorr Oliver, Salt Lake City, UT, US Filter-Envirex, Waukesha, WI, JWI, Holland, MI, Netzsch, Inc., Exton, PA, Zimpro-Passavant, Rothschild, WI (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. D. Shaw and B. Hamm, Membrane filter presses gain popularity in Asia, Water Wastewater Int. May, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shammas, N.K., Wang, L.K. (2007). Pressure Filtration. In: Wang, L.K., Shammas, N.K., Hung, YT. (eds) Biosolids Treatment Processes. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 6. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-996-7_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics