Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals ((ABAB))

Abstract

The cost of transporting wood chips by truck and by pipeline as a water slurry was determined. In a practical application of field delivery by truck of biomass to a pipeline inlet, the pipeline will only be economical at large capacity (>0.5 million dry t/yr for a one-way pipeline, and >1.25 million dry t/yr for a two-way pipeline that returns the carrier fluid to the pipeline inlet), and at medium to long distances (>75 km [one-way] and >470 km [two-way] at a capacity of 2 million dry t/yr). Mixed hardwood and softwood chips in western Canada rise in moisture level from about 50% to 67% when transported in water; the loss in lower heating value (LHV) would preclude the use of water slurry pipelines for direct combustion applications. The same chips, when transported in a heavy gas oil, take up as much as 50% oil by weight and result in a fuel that is >30% oil on mass basis and is about twothirds oil on a thermal basis. Uptake of water by straw during slurry transport is so extreme that it has effectively no LHV. Pipeline-delivered biomass could be used in processes that do not produce contained water as a vapor, such as supercritical water gasification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar, A., Cameron, J. B., and Flynn, P. C. (2003), Biomass Bioenergy 24(6), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron, J., Kumar, A., and Flynn, P. C. (2002), in Proceedings of the 12th European Biomass Conference for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, vol. 1, June 17–21, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Favreau, J. F. E. (1992), Technical report no. TR-105, Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brebner, A. (1964), Can. J. Chem. Eng. 42, 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elliott, D. R. (1960), Pulp Paper Mag. Canada 61, 170–175.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wasp, E. J., Aude, T. C., Thompson, T. L., and Bailey, C. D. (1967), Tappi 50 (7), 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunt, W.A. (1976), in Proceedings of Hydrotransport 4,1976: 4th International Conference on the Hydraulic Transport of Solids in Pipes, BHRA Fluid Engineering, Cranfield, UK, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, H., Noble, J., Zuniga, R., and Wu, J. (1995), Report no. 95–1, Capsule Pipeline Research Center (CPRC), University of Missouri, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins, B. M., Bakker, R. R., and Wei, J.B. (1996), Biomass Bioenergy 10(4), 177–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida, Y., Dowaki, K., Matsumura, Y., Matsuhashi, R., Li, D., Ishitani, H. and Komiyama, H. (2003), Biomass Bioenergy 25(3), 257–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Werther, J., Saenger, M., Haetge, E.-U., Ogada, T., and Siagi, Z. (2000), Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26, 1–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Antal, M. J., Jr., Allen, S. G., Schulman, D. and Xu, X. (2000), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39(11), 819–824.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumura, Y., Xu, X., and Antal, M. J., Jr. (1997), Carbon 35(6), 819–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumura, Y., Minowa, T., Xu, X., Nuessle, F. W., Adschiri, T., and Antal, M. J., Jr. (1997), in Developments in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, Bridgwater A. V. M. and Boocock, D. G. B., eds., Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK, pp. 864–877.

    Google Scholar 

  15. RS Means Company. (2000), in Heavy Construction Data-14th Annual Edition, Chandler, H. M., et al., eds.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peters, M. S. and Timmerhaus, K. D. (1991), Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Flynn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, A., Cameron, J.B., Flynn, P.C. (2004). Pipeline Transport of Biomass. In: Finkelstein, M., McMillan, J.D., Davison, B.H., Evans, B. (eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals Held May 4–7, 2003, in Breckenridge, CO. Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-837-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-837-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9873-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-837-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics