Abstract
Despite the prevalence and availability of high-technology diagnostic tests, the history and physical examination continue to serve as the most important initial clinical tools in assessing a patient’s condition. In urology, a urinalysis complements the history and physical examination, and a diagnosis can often be made and others excluded based on these findings alone. In an era of cost containment, an accurate history, physical examination, and urinalysis in the office can speed clinical diagnosis and determine appropriate therapy without the use of unnecessary and sometimes costly testing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected Reading
Hodges CV, Barry JM (1975) Non-urologic flank pain: a diagnostic approach. J Urol 113: 644.
Mohr DN, Offord KP, Owen RA, Melton LJ (1986) Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologie disease. A population study. JAMA 256: 224.
Stamey TA, Kindrachuk RW (1985) Urinary Sediment and Urinalysis: A Practical Guide for the Health Science Professional. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.
Woolhandler S, Pels RJ, Bor DH (1989) Dipstick urinalysis screening of asymptomatic adults for urinary tract disorders: 1. Hematuria and proteinuria. JAMA 262: 1215.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Licht, M.R. (2001). Urologic History, Physical Examination, and Urinalysis. In: Kursh, E.D., Ulchaker, J.C. (eds) Office Urology. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-010-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-010-0_6
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61737-188-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-59259-010-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive