Skip to main content

Basic Research Informing the Use of Token Economies in Applied Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autism Service Delivery

Part of the book series: Autism and Child Psychopathology Series ((ACPS))

  • 1720 Accesses

Abstract

Token economies have been used to prompt and organize human economic behavior for centuries. Features important to the establishment and maintenance of token systems began to be formally studied in the laboratory around the turn of the twentieth century. Since that time, their utility in application has been considered one of the most important advances not only within behavior analysis but also in the field of psychology more generally. This chapter reviews laboratory research that has proven foundational to understanding how best to profitably arrange token economies in application. Literature concerning the relative influence of token economic features (token production, exchange production, and token exchange) is reviewed, along with research addressing how best to condition tokens as important stimuli, how to train extended behavioral chains, and how the inclusion of aversive techniques impacts responding. Beyond providing a basis for the effective development and implementation of token economies, the following will ideally function to advance the translational interchange between research and application regarding issues of social importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ator, N. A. (1991). Subjects and instrumentation. In I. H. Iverson & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences: experimental analysis of behavior, Part I. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-81251-3.50005-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Avendano y Carderera, M. (1859). Curso elemental de pedagogia (4th ed.). Madrid: Imprenta de D. Victoriano Hernando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1965). The measurement and reinforcement of behavior of psychotics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 357–383. doi:10.1901/jeab.1965.8-357.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. H. (1968). The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(69)90022-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H. (1960a). Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 3, 123–142. doi:10.1901/jeab.1960.3-123.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., & Holz, W. C. (1966). Punishment. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and applications (pp. 380–447). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azrin, N. H., Holz, W. C., & Hake, D. F. (1963). Fixed-ratio punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 141–148. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-141.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boakes, R. A., Poli, M. M., Lockwood, M. J., & Goodall, G. G. (1978). A study of misbehavior: Token reinforcement in the rat. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 71–81. doi:10.1901/jeab.1978.29-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouton, M. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, M. N. (2006). Roger T. Kelleher, behavior analyst. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 86, 371–384. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.25-06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681–684. doi:10.1037/h0040090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Responses to a simple barter task in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Primates, 46, 173–182. doi: 10.1007/s10329-005-0125-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C. E., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2006). Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: Implications for unit price. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 95–106. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.116-04.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, J. D., & Barrera, F. (1972). An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 271–282. doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-271.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, E. J. (1967). A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60513-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers, C., Miltenberger, R., Maki, A., Barenz, R., Jurgens, M., Sailer, A., et al. (2004). A comparison of response cost and differential reinforcement of other behavior to reduce disruptive behavior in a preschool classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 411–415. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, J. T. (1937). Food-tokens as incentives for learning by chimpanzees. Comparative Psychological Monographs, 12, 1–96. doi:10.1037/14268-000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallery, J., Silverman, K., Chutuape, M. A., Bigelow, G. E., & Stitzer, M. L. (2001). Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate plus cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant methadone patients: Effects of reinforcer magnitude. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 317–325. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.9.3.317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, A. J., Rubino, C. A., & Hislop, M. W. (1973). Some effects of token rewards on school achievement of children with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 251–259. doi:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-251.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, H. (1996). Priming effects with drugs and other reinforcers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 5–10. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.4.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforce preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, J. M. R. (1963). Telemetry and telestimulation of the brain. In L. Slater (Ed.), Bio-telemetry (231–249). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury, D. A. (2003). Conflicting approaches: Operant psychology arrives at a primate laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 253–265.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–704. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00017969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellson, D. G. (1937). The acquisition of a token-reward habit in dogs. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 24, 505–522. doi:10.1037/h0063238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 313–339). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flagel, S. B., Watson, S. J., Robinson, T. E., & Akil, H. (2007). Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats. Psychopharmacology, 191, 599–607. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0535-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:10.1037/10627-000

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T. A., Hackenberg, T. D., & Vaidya, M. (2001). Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: Effects of fixed- and variable-ratio exchange schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 159–178. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-159.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. K., Hopkins, B. L., & Anger, W. K. (1987). The long-term effects of a token economy on safety performance in open-pit mining. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 215–224. doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-215.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gladman, F. J. (1885). School work: Organization and principles of education. London: Jarrold and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C. (1994). A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 113–129. doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.61-113.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 257–286. doi:10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, T. D., & Vaidya, M. (2003). Determinants of pigeons’ choices in token-based self-control procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 207–218. doi:10.1901/jeab.2003.79-207.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, D. F., Azrin, N. H., & Oxford, R. (1967). The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 95–107. doi:10.1901/jeab.1967.10-95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D. P. (1969). Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, F. O. II (1975). An investigation of the effects of token reinforcement on divergent verbal responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 459. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-459.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272. doi:10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. T., Delaney, D. D., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., Hughes, J. R., Foerg, F., et al. (1991). A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1218–1224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan- Revised Edition. In A. P. Martinich & B. Battiste (Eds.), Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham, R. J. (1983). On token reinforcement and stuttering therapy: Another view on findings reported by Howie and Woods (1982). Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 465–470. doi:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-465.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20. doi:10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, K., & Hackenberg, T. D. (1996). Token reinforcement, choice, and self-control in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 29–49. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.66-29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1972). Response cost: The removal of conditioned reinforcers for therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 3, 533–546. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(72)80001-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The token economy: A review and evaluation. New York: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4121-5.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., & Bootzin, R. R. (1972). The token economy: An evaluative review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 343–372. doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-343.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T. (1956). Intermittent conditioned reinforcement in chimpanzees. Science, 124, 679–680. doi:10.1126/science.124.3224.679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T. (1957). Conditioned reinforcement in chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49, 571–575. doi:10.1037/h0044327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T. (1958). Fixed-ratio schedules of conditioned reinforcement with chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 281–289. doi:10.1901/jeab.1958.1-281.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T. (1966). Chaining and conditioned reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 160–212). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagorio, C. H., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2010). Risky choice in pigeons and humans: A cross-species comparison. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 27–44. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-27.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lagorio, C. H., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012). Risky choice in pigeons: Preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 139–154. doi:10.1901/jeab.2012.98-139.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lattal, K. A. (1991). Scheduling positive reinforcers. In I. H. Iverson & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Techniques in the behavioral and neural sciences: Experimental analysis of behavior, Part I. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-81251-3.50005-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, D. L. (1970). A “paper money” token system as a recording aid in institutional settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 183–184. doi:10.1901/jaba.1970.3-183.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, G. A., Deich, J. D., & Wasserman, E. A. (1981). Trace autoshaping: Acquisition, maintenance, and path dependence at long trace intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 61–74. doi:10.1901/jeab.1981.36-61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macaskill, A. C., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2012). The sunk cost effect with pigeons: Some determinants of decisions about persistence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 85–100. doi:10.1901/jeab.2012.97-85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malagodi, E. F. (1967a). Acquisition of the token-reward habit in the rat. Psychological Reports, 20, 1335–1342. doi:10.2466/pr0.1967.20.3c.1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malagodi, E. F. (1967b). Fixed-ratio schedules of token reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 8, 469–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagodi, E. F. (1967c). Variable-interval schedules of token reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 8, 471–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagodi, E. F., Webbe, F. M., & Waddell, T. R. (1975). Second-order schedules of token reinforcement: Effects of varying the schedule of food presentation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 173–181. doi:10.1901/jeab.1975.24-173.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marholin, D. II, & Gray, D. (1976). Effects of group response-cost procedures on cash shortages in a small business. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 25–30. doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., & Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). The token economy for children with intellectual disability and/or autism: A review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 240–248. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1983). Steady-state performance on fixed-, mixed-, and random-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 293–307. doi:10.1901/jeab.1983.39-293.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (2001). Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychological Review, 108, 96–112. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E. (2006). Learning and behavior. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, J. E., & Biondi, D. R. (2013). Pigeons’ choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99, 159–178. doi:10.1002/jeab.12.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, T. L. (1937). The use of the “comfort” drive as motivation in visual discrimination by the infant chimpanzee. (Paper delivered at the 8th spring meeting, Eastern Branch of the American Psychological Association, April 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–108.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. J. (1989). Two modern developments in matching theory. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 153–166.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. K. (2006). Principles of everyday behavior analysis (4th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth., Centage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Belmont: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 329–337. doi:10.1037/h0029815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. (2002). Maconochie’s gentlemen: The story of Norfolk Island and the roots of modern prison reform. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1177/0032885502250397

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 73–90. doi:10.1017/S0141525X00002405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2013). Contingency management for substance abuse treatment: A guide to implementing this evidence-based practice. New York: Routledge. doi:10.1080/1533256X.2013.842097

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. L. (1968). Achievement place: Token reinforcement procedures in a home-style rehabilitation setting for pre-delinquent boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 213–223. doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-213.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietras, C. J., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2005). Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 69, 343–356. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pietras, C. J., Brandt, A. E., & Searcy, G. D. (2010). Human responding on random-interval schedules of response-cost punishment: The role of reduced reinforcement density. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 5–26. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prusky, G. T., Harker, K. T., Douglas, R. M., & Wishaw, I. Q. (2002). Variation in visual acuity within pigmented and between pigmented and albino rat strains. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 339–348. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00126-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raiff, B. R., Bullock, C. E., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2008). Response-cost punishment with pigeons: Further evidence of response suppression via token loss. Learning & Behavior, 36, 29–41. doi:10.3758/lb.36.1.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P. J. (1996). Excel-erated learning: Explaining in plain English how dogs learn and how best to teach them. Berkeley: James & Kenneth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J. O., Montesinos, L., & Preciado, J. (2005). A 19th century predecessor of the token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 427. doi:10.1901/jaba.2005.181-03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D. C., & Koegel, R. L. (1977). A method for integrating an autistic child into a normal public-school classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 579–590. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-579.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H. D., Derenne, A., & Baron, A. (2008). What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement. The Behavior Analyst, 31, 39–60.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Besserat, D. (2012). Tokens in China, Europe and Africa—the significance. SCRIPTA, 4, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K. (2004). Exploring the limits and utility of operant conditioning in the treatment of drug addiction. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 209–230.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K., Chutuape, M. A., Bigelow, G. E., & Stitzer, M. L. (1999). Voucher-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in treatment-resistant methadone patients: Effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychopharmacology, 146, 128–138. doi:10.1007/s002130051098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shahan, T. A. (2010). Conditioned reinforcement and response strength. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 269–289. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-269.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century. doi:10.2307/1416495

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan. doi:10.1002/sce.37303805120

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F. (1939). The establishment and extinction of the token-reward habit in the cat. The Journal of General Psychology, 20, 475–486. doi:10.1080/00221309.1939.9710023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, C., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001). The use of tokens as rewards and tools by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition, 4, 213–221. doi: 10.1007/s100710100104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitzer, M. L., Petry, N. M., & Pierce, J. (2010). Motivational incentives research in the national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212–222. doi:10.2307/1415413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. E., & Howard, J. S. (1984). Errorless learning: Reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 175–188. doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-175.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., & Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 111–114. doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-381.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, T. R., Leander, J. D., Webbe, F. M., & Malagodi, E. F. (1972). Schedule interactions in second-order fixed-interval (fixed-ratio) schedules of token reinforcement. Learning & Motivation, 3, 91–100. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(72)90050-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. (1977). Self-control techniques of famous novelists. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 515–525. doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-515.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webbe, F. M., & Malagodi, E. F. (1978). Second-order schedules of token reinforcement: Comparisons of performance under fixed-ratio and variable-ratio exchange schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 219–224. doi:10.1901/jeab.1978.30-219.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1962). Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 201–208. doi:10.1901/jeab.1962.5-201.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1963). Response cost and aversive control of human operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 415–421. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-415.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, H. (1964). Response cost and fixed-ratio performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 79–81. doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-79.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 261–285.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. B. (1936). Effectiveness of token rewards for chimpanzees. Comparative Psychological Monographs, 12, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelevitz, R. L., Bullock, C. E., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2008). Reinforcer accumulation in a token-reinforcement context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 283–299. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.90-283.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., & Ferster, C. B. (1964). Chained VI performance of pigeons maintained with an added stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 83–89. doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla H. Lagorio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lagorio, C., Yanagita, B. (2015). Basic Research Informing the Use of Token Economies in Applied Settings. In: DiGennaro Reed, F., Reed, D. (eds) Autism Service Delivery. Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2656-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics