Skip to main content

Obesity, Reproductive Outcomes, and Access to Infertility Treatments: A Clinical and Ethical Debate

  • Chapter
Obesity and Fertility

Abstract

Obesity poses significant maternal and fetal risks as well as unique reproductive challenges to both natural and assisted attempts at pregnancy. Given the diminished efficacy of infertility treatments including assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and increased risks of treatments in the obese population, a debate has emerged around the implementation of body mass index (BMI) cutoffs restricting access to infertility treatment. While professional medical societies in the United States do not endorse official guidelines for access to fertility treatment based on BMI cutoffs, support for and implementation of BMI cutoffs is growing. Globally, the uptake of BMI cutoffs for access to fertility treatments are being recommended and more widely enforced in countries such as New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Arguments for and against restricting access to fertility care must also be considered within a framework that considers the core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Committee on Obstetric Practice. Obesity in pregnancy, ACOG Committee opinion, no. 315; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obesity and reproduction: an educational bulletin. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5 Suppl):S21–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guzick D. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:181–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1223–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Legro RS, Barnhart HX, Schlaff WD, et al. Cooperative multicenter reproductive medicine network. Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:551–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moran LJ, Noakes M, Clifton PM, Tomlinson L, Norman RJ. Dietary composition in restoring reproductive and metabolic physiology in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:812–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheiner E, Balaban E, Dreiher J, Levi I, Levy A. Pregnancy outcome in patients following different types of bariatric surgeries. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1286–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheiner E, Levy A, Silverberg D, Menes TS, Levy I, Katz M, et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1335–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luke B, Brown M, Stern JE, Missmer SA, Fujimoto V, Leach R. Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:245–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dokras A, Baredziak L, Blaine J, Syrop C, VanVoorhis BJ, Sparks A. Obstetric outcomes after in vitro fertilization in obese and morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:61–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellver J, Rossal LP, Bosch E, Zuniga A, Corona J, Melendez F, Gomez E, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1136–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Styne-Gross A, Elkind-Hirsch K, Scott R. Obesity does not impact implantation rates or pregnancy outcome in women attempting conception through oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1629–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. BMJ. 1997;314:131–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillett WR, Putt T, Farquhar CM. Prioritising for fertility treatments—the effect of excluding women with a high body mass index. BJOG. 2006;113:1218–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gillett WR, Peek JC, Herbison GP. Development of clinical priority access criteria for assisted reproduction and its evaluation on 1386 infertile couples in New Zealand. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:131–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farquar CM, Gillett WR. Prioritising for fertility treatments—should a high BMI exclude treatment? BJOG. 2006;113:1107–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. 2013. http://publications.nice.org.uk/fertility-cg156.

  18. British Fertility Society. British fertility society issues new guidelines on the effect of obesity on female reproductive health. 2007. http://www.fertility.org.uk/news/pressrelease/07_11-ObesityFemaleHealth.html.

  19. Zachariah M, Fleming R, Acharya U. Management of obese women in assisted conception units: a UK survey. Hum Fertil. 2006;9:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson SM, Fleming RF. The preconceptual contraception paradigm: obesity and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2006;22:912–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Balen AH, Dresner M, Scott EM, Drife JO. Should obese women with polcystic ovary syndrome receive treatment for infertility? BMJ. 2006;25(332):434–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koning AMH, Kuchenbecker WKH, Groen H, Hoek A, Land JA, Khan KS, Mol BWJ. Economic consequences of overweight and obesity in infertility: a framework for evaluating the costs and outcomes of fertility care. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:246–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haris ID, Python J, Roth L, Alvero R, Murray S, Schlaff WD. Physicians’ perspectives and practices regarding the fertility management of obese patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:991–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vahratian A, Smith YR. Should access to fertility-related services be conditional on body mass index? Hum Reprod. 2009;7:1532–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pandey S, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Should access to fertility treatment be determined by female body mass index? Hum Reprod. 2010;25:815–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dondorp W, de Wert G, Pennings G, Shenfield F, Devroey P, Tarlatzis B, Barri P. Lifestyle-related factors and access to medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:578–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laredo SE. Obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility treatment: asking obese women to lose weight before treatment increases stigmatization. BMJ. 2006;332:609.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maheshwari A, Scotland G, Bell J, McTavish A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. The direct health services costs of providing assisted reproduction services in overweight or obese women: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:633–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. The Committee on Ethics. Ethical decision making in obstetrics and gynecology, ACOG Committee opinion no. 390; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha Butts MD, MSci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schon, S., Butts, S. (2015). Obesity, Reproductive Outcomes, and Access to Infertility Treatments: A Clinical and Ethical Debate. In: Jungheim, E. (eds) Obesity and Fertility. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2611-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2611-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2610-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2611-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics