Skip to main content

Ethics in the Publishing of Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Archaeological Praxis

Part of the book series: Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice ((ETHARCHAEOL,volume 1))

  • 1269 Accesses

Abstract

The ethics of archaeological publication mirror the quagmire of ethical questions that bedevils other parts of the discipline. This chapter outlines five key principles of ethical archaeological publishing in the context of these larger ethical issues. Archaeological information should be promptly published and that publication should usually, but not always, involve prior peer review. Archaeological authors must address multiple audiences, constituents, and stakeholders using language and media appropriate for them. They should maintain sensitivity to, and collaboration with, the communities from which the research was drawn. Despite the problems of the publishing establishment residing within a system of global capitalism, that system is pervasive, and scholars should consider how to accommodate it ethically as well as seek other sustainable publication options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I was responsible for its publication at AltaMira Press. The manuscript languished in the files of the Field Museum at Kroeber’s death in 1962 and a combination of politics, funds, and priorities left it there for a quarter century until David Collier, son of the late Field Museum South American curator Donald Collier, brought it to my attention. Without that accidental network connection it might still be there today.

  2. 2.

    She ended up self-publishing and coauthoring with a professional writer. The amount of popular press for her theory was inversely proportional to how little solid research lay behind it.

  3. 3.

    Such as the Archaeological Research Facility publication program at UC Berkeley or UCLA’s Cotsen Institute Press.

  4. 4.

    Like the University of Arizona Press or British Archaeological Reports.

  5. 5.

    Only English speaking publishing world is discussed here, though this range of publication outlets exists in other languages as well.

  6. 6.

    Including the Alexandrina Archive and Digital Antiquity.

References

  • Allen, M., & Joyce, R. (2010). Communicating archaeology in the 21st century. In W. Ashmore, D. Lippert, & B. Mills (Eds.), Voices in American archaeology (pp. 270–290). Washington: SAA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Wayyy (2011). The founding of America, published August 16. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://americanwayyy.blogspot.com/

  • Bristow, K. (2010). The white apocalypse. Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1998). Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, 39(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cray, D., & Clemmons, M. (2011). Soaring stones: A kite-powered approach to building Egypt’s pyramids. Los Angeles: Delcominy Creations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discovery Channel (2007). The lost tomb of Jesus. Retrieved September 4, 2012 from http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/tomb/tomb.html

  • Fagan, G. (2006). Diagnosing pseudoarchaeology. In G. Fagan (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies (pp. 23–46). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, J. (2007a). The British book market 1600-1800. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 232–246). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, J. (2007b). Copyright and literary property. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 520–530). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, D., & McCleery, A. (2006). An introduction to book history. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellinga, L. (2007). The Gutenberg revolutions. In S. Eliot & J. Rose (Eds.), A companion to the history of the book (pp. 207–219). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollowell, J., & Nicholas, G. (1998). Intellectual property issues in archaeological publication: Some considerations. Archaeologies, 4(2), 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, A. (2007). Controversies in archaeology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A., Collier, D., & Schreiber, K. J. (1998). The archaeology and pottery of Nazca, Peru: Alfred Kroeber’s 1926 expedition. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, M. (2008). The complete pyramids. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekson, S. (1999). The Chaco meridian: Centers of political power in the Ancient Southwest. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. (Ed.). (2002). Pubic benefits of archaeology. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G.P., & Bannister, K. P. (2004) Copyrighting the past? Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology, Current Anthropology, 45(3), 327–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odyssey Marine Exploration (2012). Retrieved September 8, 2012 from http://www.shipwreck.net/archaeology.php

  • Oxford University Press (2011). Annual report of the delegates of the University Press, 2010–2011. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://fds.oup.com/www.oup.com/pdf/OUP_Annual_Report_2010-11.pdf

  • Phillips, D. (n.d.). The Chaco Meridian: A skeptical analysis. Retrieved January 1, 2012 from http://www.unm.edu/~dap/meridian/meridian-text.html

  • Smith, C. (2004) On intellectual property rights in archaeology, Current Anthropology, 45(4), 527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., Messenger, P. M., & Soderland, H. (Eds.). (2010). Heritage values in contemporary society. Walnut Creek: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, D. (1997). Interview with Dennis Stanford. Retrieved January 1, 2013 from http://www.oocities.org/latrinchera2000/articulos/stanford.html

  • Stanford, D., & Bradley, B. (2012). Across Atlantic ice: The origin of America’s Clovis culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2011). Of goats and headaches, published 5/26/11. Retrieved September 3, 2012 from http://www.economist.com/node/18744177

  • Zorn, J. (n.d.). Tel en-Nasbeh: Biblical Mizpah of Benjamin. Retrieved September 8, 2012 from http://www.arts.cornell.edu/jrz3/frames2.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell Allen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Allen, M. (2015). Ethics in the Publishing of Archaeology. In: Gnecco, C., Lippert, D. (eds) Ethics and Archaeological Praxis. Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justice, vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics