Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Approaches to Colon and Rectal Disease

Abstract

Laparoscopic proctocolectomy is performed approximately 7,000 times per year in the United States, primarily for indications of ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s colitis, and familial adenomatous polyposis. The operation presents challenges, each of which can be overcome with careful preoperative planning and appropriate intraoperative maneuvers. In this chapter we review the decision-making and technical elements that are important to a successful operation.

“There are no big problems, there are just a lot of little problems.”

—Henry Ford

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellis MC, Diggs BS, Vetto JT, et al. Trends in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis over time: increased mortality and centralization of care. World J Surg. 2011;35(3):671–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Holubar SD, Long KH, Loftus Jr EV, et al. Long-term direct costs before and after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(11):1815–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kopylov U, Ben-Horin S, Zmora O, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor and postoperative complications in Crohn’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(12):2404–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Z, Wu Q, Wang F, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of preoperative infliximab use on early postoperative complications in patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing abdominal surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36(10):922–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang Z, Wu Q, Wu K, et al. Meta-analysis: pre-operative infliximab treatment and short-term post-operative complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31(4):486–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richard CS, Cohen Z, Stern HS, et al. Outcome of the pelvic pouch procedure in patients with prior perianal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(6):647–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, et al. Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(3):257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Indeterminate colitis. Long-term outcome in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(1):51–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Fazio VW, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 2006;93(4):407–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parc Y, Mabrut JY, Shields C. Surgical management of the duodenal manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):480–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa. Ann Surg. 1997;225(6):666–76. discussion 676–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hallgren TA, Fasth SB, Oresland TO, et al. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg. 1995;161(12):915–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):18–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasmuth HH, Trano G, Myrvold HE, et al. Adenoma formation and malignancy after restorative proctocolectomy with or without mucosectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(3):288–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. von Roon AC, Will OCC, Man RF, et al. Mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis reduces the risk of adenoma formation in the anorectal segment after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):314–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Weiland LH, et al. Does rectal mucosa regenerate after ileoanal anastomosis? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Laureti S, Ugolini F, D’Errico A, et al. Adenocarcinoma below ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(3):418–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith L, Friend WG, Medwell SJ. The superior mesenteric artery. The critical factor in the pouch pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(11):741–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baig MK, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, et al. Lengthening of small bowel mesentery: stepladder incision technique. Am J Surg. 2006;191(5):715–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uraiqat AA, Byrne CM, Phillips RK. Gaining length in ileal-anal pouch reconstruction: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(7):657–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Etzioni M.D., M.S.H.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Cecal mobilization (MPG 10437 kb)

Ascending colon mobilization (MPG 8330 kb)

Upper rectal mobilization with identification of the left ureter (MPG 6445 kb)

Left colon mobilization in a lateral-to-medial and counterclockwise fashion (MPG 6767 kb)

Splenic flexure mobilization (counterclockwise) (MPG 6041 kb)

Splenic flexure mobilization (clockwise) (MPG 8963 kb)

Completions splenic flexure mobilization of the retroperitoneal attachments (MPG 16256 kb)

Left side of the rectum mobilization (MPG 29725 kb)

Mobilization of the distal rectum (MPG 6511 kb)

Confirming proper orientation of the pouch prior to anastomosis (MPG 12645 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Etzioni, D.A., Young-Fadok, T.M. (2015). Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy. In: Ross MD FACS FASCRS, H., Lee MD, FACS, FASCRS, S., Mutch MD, FACS, FASCRS, M., Rivadeneira MD, MBA,FACS, FASCRS, D., Steele M.D., FACS, FASCRS, S. (eds) Minimally Invasive Approaches to Colon and Rectal Disease. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1581-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1581-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1580-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1581-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics