Abstract
Optimal mammographic technique is one of the cornerstones of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Both mammographic positioning and technique are essential in order to achieve the goal of early detection of breast cancer. In this chapter, we will discuss the various components to the imaging chain that must be carefully monitored in order to produce an optimal mammogram for the radiologist to read as well as common artifacts and some troubleshooting techniques. Requirements have been established for all personnel involved in any facet of mammography (such as production, processing, and interpretation of mammograms as well as the associated quality assurance (QA) activities. Each facility also has to establish and maintain a quality assurance program in order to ensure the safety, reliability, clarity, and accuracy of all of the mammography services performed. These quality standards will be discussed in more detail as part of this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Society AC. Cancer facts and figures 2012 Atlanta. 2012 [cited 22 Jan 2013]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf.
Society AC. Breast cancer facts and figures 2011–2012 Atlanta. 2012 [cited 22 Jan, 2013]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/BreastCancerFactsFigures/ACSPC-030975.
Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009. Bethesda. 2009 [cited 2012]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/.
Radiology ACO. American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program requirements, Reston [updated 2 May 2012, cited 26 January 2013]. Available from: http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/Accreditation/Mammography/Requirements.pdf.
Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(6):1149–53.
Administration USFaD. Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations. Silver Spring [updated 4 Mar 2009; cited 8 June 2013]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/Regulations/ucm110906.htm.
D’Orsi C, Berg WBL, et al. ACR breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS atlas). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
Kopans DB, Moore R, McCarthy KA, et al. Should women with implants or a history of treatment for breast cancer be excluded from mammography screening programs? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:29–31.
Meyer JE. Atlas of mammography; histologic and mammographic correlation. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1982.
Watson AB, Lamki N, Michael E, Athey PA, Contant C. Geometric localization of breast lesions in two view mammography. Society of Breast Imaging 2nd Postgraduate Course; Orlando; 1995.
Radiology ACo. American College of Radiology Recommendations for full-field digital mammography quality control [updated 25 Sep 2006; cited 24 June 2013]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4236b2-05-acr-table.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ortiz-Perez, T., Watson, A.B. (2015). Mammography Techniques, Positioning, and Optimizing Image Quality. In: Shetty, M. (eds) Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1267-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1267-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1266-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1267-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)