Skip to main content

Whole-Body Image Registration Using Patient-Specific Nonlinear Finite Element Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Biomechanics for Medicine

Abstract

Registration of whole-body radiographic images is an important task in analysis of the disease progression and assessment of responses to therapies. Numerous registration algorithms have been successfully used in applications where differences between source and target images are relatively small. However, registration of whole-body CT scans remains extremely challenging for such algorithms as it requires taking large deformations of body organs and articulated skeletal motions into account. For registration problems involving large differences between source and target images, registration using biomechanical models has been recommended in the literature. Therefore, in this study, we propose a patient-specific nonlinear finite element model to predict the movements and deformations of body organs for the whole-body CT image registration. We conducted a verification example in which a patient-specific torso model was implemented using a suite of nonlinear finite element algorithms we previously developed, verified and successfully used in neuroimaging registration. When defining the patient-specific geometry for the generation of computational grid for our model, we abandoned the time-consuming hard segmentation of radiographic images typically used in patient-specific biomechanical modelling to divide the body into non-overlapping constituents with different material properties. Instead, an automated Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) algorithm for tissue classification was applied to assign the constitutive properties at finite element mesh integration points. The loading was defined as a prescribed displacement of the vertebrae (treated as articulated rigid bodies) between the two CT images. Contours of the abdominal organs obtained by warping the source image using the deformation field within the body predicted using our patient-specific finite element model differed by only up to only two voxels from the actual organs’ contours in the target image. These results can be regarded as encouraging step in confirming feasibility of conducting accurate registration of whole-body CT images using nonlinear finite element models without the necessity for time-consuming image segmentation when building patient-specific finite element meshes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Makela T, Clarysse P, Sipila O, Pauna N, Pham QC, Katila T, Magnin IE (2002) A review of cardiac image registration methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(9):1011–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 46(3):R1–R45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Little JA, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (1997) Deformations incorporating rigid structures. Comput Vis Image Understand 66(2):223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. d’Aische AD, De Craene M, Geets X, Gregoire V, Macq B, Warfield SK (2005) Efficient multi-modal dense field non-rigid registration: alignment of histological and section images. Med Image Anal 9(6):538–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li X, Yankeelov TE, Peterson TE, Gore JC, Dawant BM (2008) Automatic nonrigid registration of whole body CT mice images. Med Phys 35(4):1507–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wittek A, Miller K, Kikinis R, Warfield SK (2007) Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration. J Biomech 40(4):919–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagemann A, Rohr K, Stiehl HS, Spetzger U, Gilsbach JM (1999) Biomechanical modeling of the human head for physically based, nonrigid image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(10):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Otoole RV, Jaramaz B, Digioia AM, Visnic CD, Reid RH (1995) Biomechanics for preoperative planning and surgical simulations in orthopedics. Comput Biol Med 25(2):183–191

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, O’Dell WG, Zhong JH (2004) Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images. Med Phys 31(3):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Snedeker JG, Wirth SH, Espinosa N (2012) Biomechanics of the normal and arthritic ankle joint. Foot Ankle Clin 17(4):517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller K, Wittek A, Joldes G (2011) Biomechanical modeling of the brain for computer-assisted neurosurgery. In K. Miller, Eds., Biomechanics of the Brain. Springer, New York, pp 111–136

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramos A, Simoes JA (2006) Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 28(9):916–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wittek A, Hawkins T, Miller K (2009) On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8(1):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang JY, Joldes GR, Wittek A, Miller K (2013) Patient-specific computational biomechanics of the brain without segmentation and meshing. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng 29(2):293–308

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller K, Joldes G, Lance D, Wittek A (2007) Total Lagrangian explicit dynamics finite element algorithm for computing soft tissue deformation. Commun Numer Meth Eng 23(2):121–134

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Flanagan DP, Belytschko T (1981) A uniform strain hexahedron and quadrilateral with orthogonal hourglass control. Int J Numer Meth Eng 17(5):679–706

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Joldes GR, Wittek A, Miller K (2008) An efficient hourglass control implementation for the uniform strain hexahedron using the total Lagrangian formulation. Commun Numer Meth Eng 24(11):1315–1323

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is a recipient of the SIRF scholarship and acknowledges the financial support of the University of Western Australia. The financial support of National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant No. APP1006031) and Australian Research Council (Discovery Grants No. DP1092893 and DP120100402) is gratefully acknowledged. This investigation was also supported in part by NIH grants R01 EB008015 and R01 LM010033, and by a research grant from the Children’s Hospital Boston Translational Research Program. In addition, the authors also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of National Centre for Image Guided Therapy (NIH U41RR019703) and the National Alliance for Medical Image Computing (NAMIC), funded by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Grant U54 EB005149. Information on the National Centres for Biomedical Computing can be obtained from http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/bioinformatics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karol Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, M. et al. (2014). Whole-Body Image Registration Using Patient-Specific Nonlinear Finite Element Model. In: Doyle, B., Miller, K., Wittek, A., Nielsen, P. (eds) Computational Biomechanics for Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0745-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0745-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0744-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0745-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics