Abstract
Physicians, regardless of their specialty, from time to time may face a request from their patients to fill out a form or write a letter certifying an impairment or disability and resulting in some benefits including absence from work. However, the practice of impairment and disability assessment is rarely, if ever, a part of their formal medical or postgraduate training. Indeed, most physicians feel unprepared when asked to perform these evaluations, and a majority of them write their opinions on a subjective basis with little or no objective foundation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Medical Association. (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago: Author.
Burd, J. G. (1980). The educated guess: Doctors and permanent partial disability percentage. Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association, 73, 441.
Clark, W. L., Haldeman, S., Johnson, P., et al. (1988). Back impairment and disability determination: another attempt at objective, reliable rating. Spine, 13,332–341.
Engle, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196, 129–136.
Greenberg v.Perkins 845 P.2d 530, 538 (Colo 1993).
Harris v. Kreutzer, 624 S.E. 2d 24, 27 (Va. 2006).
Iezzoni, L. I., & Freedman, V. A. (2008). Turning the disability tide: the importance of definitions. JAMA, 299, 332–334.
McGeary, M., Ford, M., McCutchen, S. R., et al., Eds. (2007) IOM Committee on Medical Evaluation of Veterans for Disability Compensation. A 21st century system for evaluating veterans for disability benefits. The rating schedule. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Novick, A. K., & Rondinelli, R. D. (2000). Impairment and disability under Workers’ Compensation. In R. D. Rondinelli & R. T. Katz (Eds.), Impairment rating and disability evaluation (pp. 141–156). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
Oboler, S. (2000). Disability evaluation under the Department of Veterans Affairs. In R. D. Rondinelli & R. T. Katz (Eds.), Impairment rating and disability evaluation (pp. 187–211). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability. From theory to practice (pp. 30–42). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Pryor, E. S. (1990). Flawed promises: A critical evaluation of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. Harvard Law Review, 103, 964–976.
Ranavaya, M.I. (1997). Presidential address. American Academy of Disability evaluating physicians.
Ranavaya, M. I., & Brigham, C. (2011, May–June) International use of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Guides Newsletter.
Ritchie v. Krasner, (No.1.CA-CV08-0099. Filed April 21, 2009).
Robinson, J. P., & Wolfe, C. V. (2000). Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income. In R. D. Rondinelli & R. T. Katz (Eds.), Impairment rating and disability evaluation (pp. 159–176). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
Rondinelli, R. D. (2009). Changes for the new AMA guides to impairment ratings, 6th Edition: Implications and applications for physician disability evaluations. PM&R, 1(7), 643–656.
Rondinelli, R. D., Dunn, W., Hassanein, K. M., et al. (1997). A simulation of hand impairments: effects on upper extremity function and implications toward medical impairment rating and disability determination. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 1358–1363.
Rondinelli, R., Eskay-Auerbach, M., Ranavaya, M., et al. (2012, Nov–Dec) Commentary on NCCI Report. Guides Newsletter.
Rondinelli, R. D., & Katz, R. (2002). Merits and shortcomings of the American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. A physiatric perspective. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 13, 355–370.
Rondinelli, R. D., Murphy, J., Esler, A., et al. (1992). Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry: a comparison of three methods. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 71, 219–224.
Social Security Administration. (1999). Disability evaluation under social security (pp. 64–039). Washington, DC: Office of Disability (SSA Pub. No. 64-039).
Spieler, E. A., Barth, P. S., Burton, J. F., et al. (2000). Recommendations to guide revision of the Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. JAMA, 283, 519–523.
Veterans Benefits Administration. Schedule for rating disabilities. Section 1155, Title 38 CFR, Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans’ Relief.
Waddell, G., Burton, A. K., & Aylward, M. (2008, May–June). A biopsychosocial model of sickness and disability. Guides Newsletter, pp. 1–20.
World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rondinelli, R., Ranavaya, M. (2014). Current American Medical Association Guidelines for Evaluating Musculoskeletal Impairment at Maximum Medical Improvement. In: Gatchel, R., Schultz, I. (eds) Handbook of Musculoskeletal Pain and Disability Disorders in the Workplace. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0612-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0612-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0611-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)