Abstract
The impacts of biofuels are not limited to biofuel industry and the agriculture sector, they spill over throughout an economy due to the inter-linkages between production sectors. The impacts are also felt across the borders through the international trade. For example, EU’s mandate on biofuels could boost Brazil and Indonesia’s economy. Using global macroeconomic models, particularly, computable general equilibrium (CGE) models, a number of studies have assessed economic impacts of EU’s or global mandates on biofuels (e.g., Timilsina et al. 2012; Hertel et al. 2010; Kretschmer et al. 2010). While a single biofuel project implemented in a country may not have economic impacts at a scale noticeable at a national and an international level, a large group of projects or a biofuel policy aiming a large-scale expansion of biofuels would certainly have significant economic impacts at country level if not at global level. For example, Timilsina et al. (2012) finds that if the biofuel mandates and targets announced by the 40 plus countries around the world are executed by 2020 thereby increasing the share of biofuels in the global liquid fuel demand for transportation to 9 % from the current level of 3 %, various countries or regions would exhibit significant difference in their economic impacts ranging from 0.23 % loss of GDP in India to 0.05 % increase in GDP in Thailand. However, at the global level the impact was fairly modest (0.02 %) compared to that in the baseline. Similarly, Kretschmer et al. (2009) find a 10 % EU-wide biofuel mandate not causing a noticeable change in aggregate welfare of EU countries compared to a reference scenario where EU meets its 20 % GHG mitigation targets without biofuel mandate. However, the welfare impacts differ significantly across EU countries with some countries gaining, while others loosing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The change in GDP was measured compared to the baseline where the share of biofuels in total liquid fuel consumption for transportation was 5.4 %.
- 2.
The concept of equivalent variation was introduced by British economist Sir John Richard Hicks in 1937. For more details, please refer to Mas-Colell et al. (1995).
- 3.
Rice production decreases as land is reallocated towards oilseeds, sugar, and grains. Behaving as an inferior good, rice exhibits a negative price response to income.
References
Banse, M., van Meijl, H., Tabeau, A., & Woltjer, G. (2008). Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 35(2), 117–141.
Gohin, A. (2008). Impacts of the European biofuel policy on the farm sector: A general equilibrium assessment. Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 623–641.
Hertel, T. W., Tyner, W., & Birur, D. K. (2010). The global impacts of biofuel mandates. The Energy Journal, 31(1), 75–100.
Huang, J., Yang, J., Msangi, S., Rozelle, S., & Weersink, A. (2012). Biofuels and the poor: Global impact pathways of biofuels on agricultural markets. Food Policy, 37, 439–451.
Kretschmer, B., Peterson, S., & Ignaciuk, A. M. (2009). Integrating biofuels into the DART model: Analysing the effects of the EU 10 % biofuel target. In Loy, J.-P. Müller, & Rolf A. E. (Eds.), Agrar- und Ernährungsmärkte nach dem Boom: 49. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e. V. vom 30. September bis 02. Oktober 2009, ISBN 978-3-7843-5106-3, pp. 63–74.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., & Green, J. (1995). Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Padella, M., Finco, A., & Tyner, W. E. (2012). Impacts of biofuels policies in the EU. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 1(3), 87–104.
Taheripour, F., Hertel, T., Tyner, W., Beckman, J., & Birur, D. (2010). Biofuels and their by-products: global economic and environmental implications. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33(3), 278–289.
Timilsina, G. R., Beghin, J. C., van der Mensbrugghe, D., & Mevel, S. (2010). The impacts of biofuel targets on land-use change and food supply: A global CGE assessment (Policy research Working Paper 5513). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Timilsina, G. R., Beghin, J. C., van der Mensbrugghe, D., & Mevel, S. (2012). The impacts of biofuel targets on land-use change and food supply: A global CGE assessment. Agriculture Economics, 43, 315–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Timilsina, G.R. (2014). Economic Impacts of Biofuels. In: Timilsina, G., Zilberman, D. (eds) The Impacts of Biofuels on the Economy, Environment, and Poverty. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 41. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0518-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0518-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0517-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0518-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)