Skip to main content

Primary Repair of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Elbow

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury

Abstract

Injuries to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL can be devastating in overhead and throwing athletes. Prior to 1986 injury to this ligament was considered to be career ending. In that year, Dr. Frank Jobe reported on his initial experiences with reconstruction of the MUCL. His first case was pitcher Tommy John, who underwent what at that point was considered an experimental surgery to reconstruct the ligament using the palmaris longus tendon. The success of the classic “Tommy John” surgery in professional athletes has led most of these injuries to be managed by the same reconstructive technique. However, the injuries in young athletes do not appear to be the same as those sustained by professionals; one of the issues that led Dr. Jobe to utilize a reconstruction rather than a repair was the “wear and tear” of repetitive micro-trauma rather than a discrete area of injury. Fortunately in young, active athletes, the initial injury often is isolated to a single area, increasing the chance of both nonoperative and direct repair each being successful in allowing a return to sport. Unfortunately, there has been little focus on alternative treatment options in these young, nonprofessional athletes who continue to have instability despite conservative treatment and who wish to continue in sports. Many of these young athletes may have MUCL injuries isolated to one area in the proximal or distal end of the ligament that would seemingly allow a repair rather than reconstruction. Rather than extrapolate the data from professional athletes that the classic “Tommy John” operation is necessary for all of these young athletes to return to sports, we developed a protocol of repair in these players in which the ligament had a single area of injury on either the proximal end, distal end, or both in an attempt to minimize morbidity and loss of time and allow a more rapid return to sports. The indications for repair include a repairable injury (i.e., an injury to the ligament confined to the proximal or distal end of the ligament with or without a small fragment of bone) and a patient who desires to continue his throwing activity. In our initial study, 93 % (56 of 60) of these young (age range 13–23, avg. 16) athletes in the study returned to sports within 6 months (range 4–11.7 months) postoperatively at the same or higher level of competition.

Repair of MUCL remains a viable and most likely underused option in the management of MUCL injuries in these young athletes. Reports have shown excellent results and return to play in athletes. We recommend primary repair of MUCL for patients participating at the college level of play or younger if the damage is at one or both ends and if the rest of the ligament is normal to magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) testing and direct inspection. Our conclusion is that patients can obtain a favorable outcome after repair of proximal or distal ligament injuries with a more rapid return to competition when the appropriate patient is selected for primary repair of the MUCL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. An KN, Morrey BF, Chao EYS. The effect of partial removal of proximal ulna on elbow constraint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;Aug(209):270–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews JR, Heggland EJ, Fleisig GS, et al. Relationship of ulnar collateral ligament strain to amount of medial olecranon osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:716–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrey BF, An KN. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrey BF, An KN. Functional anatomy of the ligaments of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;Dec(201):84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morrey BF, Tanaka S, An KN. Valgus stability of the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;Apr(265):187.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regan WD, Korinek SL, Morrey BF, et al. Biomechanical study of ligaments around the elbow joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;Oct(271):170–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab GH, Bennett JB, Woods GW, et al. Biomechanics of elbow instability: the role of the medial collateral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;Jan–Feb(146):42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sojbjerg JO, Ovesen J, Nielsen S. Experimental elbow instability after transaction of the medial collateral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;May(218):186–90.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes DA, Tullos HS. An analysis of 100 symptomatic baseball players. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:62–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenter K, Behr CT, Warren RF, et al. Acute elbow injuries in the national football league. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Podesta L, Crow SA, Volkmer D, Bert T, Yocum LA. Treatment of partial ulnar collateral ligament tears in the elbow with platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1689–94. doi:10.1177/0363546513487979. (PMID:23666850).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Argo D, Trenhaile S, Savoie FH, et al. Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency of the elbow in female athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Azar FM, Andrews JR, Wilk KE, et al. Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:16–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Conway JE, Jobe FW, Glousman RE, et al. Medial instability of the elbow in throwing athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:67–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jobe FW, Stark H, Lombardo SJ. Reconstruction of the ligament in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1158–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Norwood LA, Shook JA, Andrews JR. Acute medial elbow ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9:16–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Savoie FH III, Trenhaile SW, Roberts J, Field LD, Ramsey LR. Primary repair of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in young athletes: a case series of injuries to the proximal and distal ends of the ligament. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:1066–72. doi:10.1177/0363546508315201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Richard MJ, Aldridge JMI II, Wiesler ER, Ruch, DS. Traumatic valgus instability of the elbow: pathoanatomy and results of direct repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2416–22. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith GR, Altechek DW, Pagnani MJ, et al. A muscle-splitting approach to the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:575–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson WH, Jobe FW, Yocum LA, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in athletes: Muscle-splitting approach without transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:152–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen SJ, Fleisig GS, Dun S, Loftice J, Andrews JR. Risk factors for should and elbow injuries in adolescent baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Field LD, Altchek DW. Evaluation of the arthroscopic valgus instability test of the elbow. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:177–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Savoie, FHIII, Morgan, C, Yaste, J, Hurt, J, Field, LD. Medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using hamstring allograft in overhead throwing athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95(12):1062–6. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00213.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ellenbecker TS, Wilk KE, Altchek DW, Andrews, JR. Current concepts in rehabilitation following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction. Sports Health. 2009;1(4):301–13. doi:10.1177/1941738109338553.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Andrews JR, Carson WG. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthroscopy. 1985;1:97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Andrews JR, Timmerman LA. Arthroscopic treatment of posttraumatic elbow pain and stiffness. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gainor BJ, Piotrowski G, Puhl J, et al. The throw: biomechanics and acute injury. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:114–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mirabello SC, Loeb PE, Andrews JR: The wrist: field evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Med. 1992 11:1–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW. Biomechanical aspects of the elbow in sports. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 1995;3:149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fleisig GS, Dillman CJ, Escamilla RF, et al. Kinetics of baseball pitching with implications about injury mechanisms. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23:233–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Salvo JP, Rizio L, Zvijac JE, Urib e JW, Kechtman KS. Avulsion fracture of the ulnar sublime tubercle in overhead throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):426–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dodson CC, Thomas A, Dines JS, et al. Medical ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in throwing athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:(12);1926–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cain EL Jr, Andrews JR, Dugas JR, Wilk KE, McMichael CS, Walter JC II, Riley RS, Arthur ST. Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-Year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(12):2426–34. doi:10.1177/0363546510378100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inoue G, Kuwahata Y. Surgical repair of traumatic medial disruption of the elbow in competitive athletes. Br J Sports Med. 1995;29:139–42 doi:10.1136/bjsm.29.2.139.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix H. Savoie III MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Video Legends

Video 13.1 Elbow arthroscopy can be performed in the prone position prior to the open surgery. Once the diagnostic arthroscopy has been completed the shoulder can be internally rotated, placing the hand on the arm board to expose the medial side of the elbow for the open approach

Video 13.2 A 5 cm incision is made from the tip of the medial epicondyle distally in line with the flexor-pronator muscles

Video 13.3 The flexor-pronator fascia is exposed by blunt dissection, looking carefully for and protecting the medial ante-brachial cutaneous nerve which often crosses the surgical field in this area

Video 13.4 Once the flexor-pronator fascia is exposed it is split longitudinally, revealing the red muscle fibers which are then bluntly separated to expose the ligament

Video 13.5 Once the ligament has been exposed, its outer surface is inspected; an incision is then made along its anterior border to allow for complete inspection of the torn area and the undersurface of the ligament. Note the egress of fluid from the prior arthroscopy as the incision is made

Video 13.6 The ligament is evaluated completely on both the outer and undersurface to confirm suitability for repair. If additional areas of damage are noted the repair is abandoned and a reconstruction performed

Video 13.7 Once the double loaded anchor is placed into the origin site of the humerus the first of 2 sets of sutures are individually passed in mattress fashion through the ligament. Note the blunt retractor carefully protecting the ulnar nerve, which lies adjacent to the ligament

Video 13.8 Placement of the first set of sutures is checked to insure they will repair the ligament anatomically and are in good tissue

Video 13.9 A second set of sutures is passed in mattress fashion more distally through the ligament as a backup to the primary repair

Video 13.10 The suture sets are tied sequentially. We usually tie the distal one first to take tension off the primary repair stitch

Video 13.11 Once the repair is completed the range of motion is tested. The small incision anterior to the ligament can be closed and motion and stability re-assessed by manual testing and, if necessary, repeat arthroscopy

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savoie, F., O’Brien, M., Field, L. (2015). Primary Repair of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries of the Elbow. In: Dines, J., Altchek, D. (eds) Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7540-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7540-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7539-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7540-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics