Skip to main content

Dimensions of Cooperative Classroom Structures

  • Chapter
Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn

Abstract

The case for cooperative learning has been made on many grounds; it usually (1) enhances student achievement, especially the achievement of minority and low-achieving students; (2) improves cross-ethnic relations; (3) aids in the successful mainstreaming of handicapped students; (4) facilitates the maintenance of minority cultural values; (5) promotes positive social relations and prosocial development; and (6) increases the liking among students for class, school, learning, and self. The theoretical arguments and the empirical data that support such claims have been presented in various forms (Aronson, 1978; Johnson & Johnson, 1975; Johnson, Maruyama, Johnson, Nelson, & Skon, 1981; Johnson, Rynders, Johnson, Schmidt, & Haider, 1979; Kagan, 1980, 1983; Sharan, 1980; Sharan & Sharan, 1976; Slavin, 1980a, 1983).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aronson, E. The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., Rynders, J., Johnson, D. W., Schmidt, B., & Haider, S. Interaction between handicapped and nonhandicapped teenagers as a function of situational goal structuring: Implications for mainstreaming. American Educational Research Journal, 1979, 16, 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. Cooperation-competition, culture, and structural bias in classrooms. In S. Sharan, A. P. Hare, C. Webb, & R. Lazarowitz (Eds.), Cooperation in education. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. Social orientation among Mexican-American children: A challenge to traditional classroom structures. In E. Garcia (Ed.), The Mexican American child: Language, cognition, and social development. Tempe, Ariz.: Center for Bilingual Education, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S. Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 241–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. A Group-Investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom. In S. Sharan, P. Hare, C. D. Webb, & R. Hertz-Lazarowitz (Eds.), Cooperation in education. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S. & Sharan, Y. Small-group teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 1980, 50, 315–342. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. Effects of student teams and peer tutoring on academic achievement and time on-task. Journal of Experimental Education, 1980, 48, 252–257. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. Using student team learning. Baltimore: John Hopkins Team Learning Project, 1980. Also available as Student team learning: A manual for teachers. In S. Sharan, A. P Hare, C. Webb, & R. Lazarowitz (Eds.), Cooperation in education. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1980. (c)

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. Cooperative learning. New York: Longman, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kagan, S. (1985). Dimensions of Cooperative Classroom Structures. In: Slavin, R., Sharan, S., Kagan, S., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Webb, C., Schmuck, R. (eds) Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3650-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3652-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3650-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics