Abstract
The fact that mental functions are asymmetrically represented in the cerebral hemispheres of humans has been central to much of the study of the relationship between brain functions and behavior over the past 25 years. This fact, of course, was recognized much earlier, largely beginning with the observations of Broca and Wernicke that language disturbances were associated with left-hemisphere damage. Subsequently, similar arguments about the lateralization of function in the brain have also been made about such nonlanguage functions as music. Although the behavioral disturbances seen in the neurological syndromes of aphasia or amusia are not typically modality-specific, they have provided important eIues about where 10 beg in the study of how the brain processes linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory patterns. Because of the strong association between language and left-hemisphere function, a useful working assumption has been that the characteristics of the speech perception process are likely to be quite similar, if not identical, to the characteristics of cortical hearing in the left hemisphere. On the other side of the brain, however, the characteristics of cortical hearing are less weIl understood. This chapter, then, focuses on one of the processes underlying the right hemisphere’s purported musical skills. The eIues broadly suggested by the clinical syndromes and narrowed by experimental studies with both normal subjects and patients with focal brain damage are considered here. Based on this evidence, it is argued that one of the areas in which the right hemisphere has a relative advantage over the left is in processing steady-state harmonic information, and it does so in a manner that is important in extracting pitch information from complex periodic sounds. This capacity, then, is a significant contributor to the apparent right-hemisphere advantage for some musical functions, and almost certainly, it plays a role in the right hemisphere’s contribution to the prosody of fluent speech.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alajouanine, T. Aphasia and artistic realization. Brain, 1948, 71, 229 - 241.
Benton, A. L. The amusias. In M. Critchley & R. A. Henson (Eds.), Music anti the brain. Springfield, III.: Charles C Thomas, 1977.
Berlin, C. I., & Cullen, J. K. Acoustic problems in dichotic listening. In S. Segalowitz & F. Grober (Eds.), Language development anti neurological theory. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
Berlin, C., & Olroyd, M. Unpublished study reported in C. Berlin, Critical review of the literature on dichotic effects, 1970. 1971 Reviews of Scientijic Literature on Hearing. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 1972, 80 - 90.
Berlin, C., Porter, R., Lowe·Bell, So., Berlin, H., Thompson, C., & Hughes, L. Dichotic signs of recognition of speech elements in normals, temporal lobectomies, and hemispherectomies. IEEE Transactions on Audio anti Electroacoustics, 1973, 21. 189 - 195.
Bever, T. G., & Chiarello, R. J. Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians. Science, 1974,185,137-139.
Blumstein, S., & Cooper, W. E. Hemispheric processing of intonation contours. Cortex, 1974, 10, 146 - 158.
Blumstein, S., Goodglass, H., & Tartter, V. The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain anti Language, 1975, 2, 226 - 236.
Bocea, E., Calearo, C., Cassinari, V., & Migliavacca, F. Testing "cortical" hearing in temporal lobe tumors. Acta Otolaryngology, 1955, 45, 289 - 304.
Botez, M. I., & Wertheim, N. Expressive aphasia and amusia following right frontal lesion in a right-handed man. Brain, 1959, 82, 186 - 202.
Brust, J. C. M. Music and language: Musical alexia and agraphia. Brain, 1980, 103, 367-392.
Cullen, J. K., Thompson, C. L., Hughes, L. F., Berlin, C. I., & Samson, D. S. The effects of varied acoustic parameters on performance in dichotic speech perception tasks. Brain anti Language, 1974,1, 307-322.
Curry, F. A comparison of the performances of a right hemispherectomized subject and 25 normals on four dichotic 1istening tasks. Cortex, 1968, 4, 144 - 153.
Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. "Paradoxic" ear extinction in dichotic listening: Possible anatomie significance. Neurology, 1979, 29, 644 - 653.
Danly, M., deVilliers, J. G., & Cooper, W. E. The control of speech prosody in Broca's aphasia. In J. J. Wolf & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Speech Communication Papers Presented at the 97th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. New York: Acoustical Society of America, 1979.
Evans, E. F., Ross, H. F., & Whitfield, I. C. The spatial distribution of unit characteristic frequency in the primary auditory cortex of the cat. Journal of Physiology, 1965, 179, 238 - 247.
Fletcher, H. The physical criterion for determining the pitch of a musical tone. Physical Review, 1924, 23, 427 - 437.
Gates, A., & Bradshaw, J. L. Music perception and cerebral asymmetries. Cortex, 1977(a), 13, 390 - 401.
Gates, A., & Bradshaw, J. L. The role of the cerebral hemispheres in music. Brain and Language, 1977(b), 4, 403 - 431.
Goldstein, J. L. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973, 54, 1496 - 1516.
Goldstein, M. H., Abeles, M., Daly, R. L., & McIntosh, J. Functional architecture in cat primary auditory cortex: Tonotopic organization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1970, 33, 188 - 197.
Goldstein, J. L., Gerson, P., Srulovicz, P., & Furst, M. Verification of the optimal probabilistic basis of aural processing in pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 63, 486 - 497.
Goodglass, H. Binaural digit presentation and early lateralized brain damage. Cortex, 1967, 2, 295 - 306.
Goodglass, H., & Calderon, M. Parallel processing of verbal and musical stimuli in right and left hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 15, 397 - 407.
Gordon, H. W. Hemispheric asymmetries in the perception of musical chords. Cortex, 1970, 6, 387 - 397.
Gordon, H. W. Auditory specialization of the right and left hemispheres. In M. Kinsboume & W. L. Smith (Eds.), Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, III.: Charles C Thomas, 1974.
Gordon, H. W., & Bogen, J. E. Hemispheric lateralization of singing after intercarotid sodium amylobarbitone. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1974, 37, 727 - 738.
Haggard, M., & Parkinson, A. Stimulus and task factors as determinants of ear advantage. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 23, 168 - 177.
Hall, J. W., & Peters, R. W. Change in the pitch of a complex tone following its association with a second tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1982, 71, 142 - 146.
Heilman, K. M., Scholes, R., & Watson, R. T. Auditory affective agnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery,and Psychiatry, 1975, 38, 69 - 72.
HeImholtz, H. L. On the sensations of tone. English translation of the 1885 edition by Alexander J. Ellis.New York: Dover Publications, 1954.
Houtsma, A. J. M., & Goldstein, J. L. Tbe central origin of the pitch of complex tones: Evidence from musical interval recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972, 51, 520 - 529.
Hughlings-Jackson, J. On affections of speech from disease of the brain. Brain, 1879, 2, 203 - 333.
Jerger, J. Audiological manifestations of lesions in the auditory nervous system. Laryngoscope, 1960, 79, 417 - 425.
Johnson, P. R. Dichotically-stimulated ear differences in musicians and nonmusicians. Cortex, 1977, 13, 385 - 389.
Kallman, H., & Corballis, M. C. Ear asymmetry in reaction time to musical sounds. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 17, 368 - 370.
Kimura, D. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961, 15, 156 - 165.
Kimura, D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 16, 355 - 358.
Kimura, D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 1967, 3, 163 - 178.
Licklider, J. C. R. Periodicity pitch and place pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1954,26,945(A).
Lieberman, P., & MichaeIs, S. B. Some aspects of fundamental frequency and envelope amplitude as related to emotional content of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962, 34, 922 - 927.
Luria, A. R. Higher cortical function in man. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
Milner, B. Laterality effects in audition. In V. B. Mountcastle (Ed.), Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962.
Moe, C. R. An experimental study of subjective tones produced within the human ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1942, 14, 159 - 166.
Monrad-Krohn, G. H. Dysptosody or altered "melody of language." Brain, 1947, 70, 405-415. (a)
Monrad-Krohn, G. H. The prosodic quality of speech and its disorders. Acta Psycho/ogica et Neurologica, 1947, 22, 255-269. (b)
Oxbury, J., & Oxbury, S. Effects of temporallobectomy on the report of dichotically presented digits. Cortex, 1969, 5, 3 - 24.
Pike, K. L. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1945.
Plomp, R. The ear as a frequency analyzer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 1628 - 1636.
Plomp, R. Detectability threshold for combination tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 37, 1110 - 1123.
Plomp, R. Pitch of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967, 41, 1526–1533.
Ritsma, R. Frequeneies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967, 42, 191 - 198.
Ritsma, R., & Engel, F. L. Pitch of frequeney modulated signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1964, 36, 1637 - 1644.
Romani, G. L., Williamson, S. J., & Kaufman, L. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science, 1982, 216, 1339 - 1340.
Rose, J. E., Ga1ambos, R., & Hughes, J. R. Microeleetrode studies of the cochlear nucei of the cat. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1959, 104, 211-251.
Ross, E. D. The aprosodias. Archives of Neurology, 1981, 38, 561 - 569.
Ross, E. D., & Mesulam, M. M. Dominant 1anguage functions of the right hemisphere. Archives of Neurology, 1979, 36, 144 - 148.
Schlanger, B. B., Schlanger, P., & Gertsman, L. J. The perception of emotionally toned sentenees by right-hemisphere damaged and aphasic subjeets. Brain and Language, 1976, 3, 396–403.
Schouten, J. F. The perception of subjective tones. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, 1938, 41, 1086–1093.
Schouten, J. F. The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, 1940, 43, 356–365.
Schouten, J. F., Ritsma, R. J., & Cardozo, L. B. Piteh of the residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962, 34, 1418 - 1424.
Schulhoff, C., & Goodglass, H. Dichotie 1istening, side of brain injury and cerebral dominance. Neuropsychologia, 1969, 7, 149 - 160.
Seebeck, A. Beobacntungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1841, 53, 417 - 436.
Shanks, J., & Ryan, W. A comparison of aphasie and non-brain-injured adults on a dichotic CV syllable listening task. Cortex, 1976, 12, 100 - 112.
Shankweiler, D. Effects of temporal-lobe damage on the perception of dichotically presented melodies. Journal of Physiological Psychology, 1966, 62, 115 - 119.
Sidtis, J. J. Dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Symposium: Human split-brain research-The second decade. Washington, D. C.: Eastern Psychological Association, 1978.
Sidtis, J. J. On the nature of cortical function underlying right hemisphere auditory function. Neuropsychologia, 1980, 18, 321 - 330.
Sidtis, J. J. The complex tone test implications for the assessment of auditory laterality effects. Neuropsychologla 1981, 19, 103 - 112.
Sidtis, J. J. Predicting lateralization from asymmetries that reflect left and right hemisphere functions. Brain and Language, 1982, 17, 287 - 300.
Sidtis, J. J., & Bryden, M. P. Asymmetrical perception of language and music: Evidence for independent processing strategies. Neuropsychologia, 1978 16, 621 - 632.
Sidtis, J. J., & Gazzaniga, M. S. Complex pitch perception after callosal section: Further evidence for a right hemisphere mechanism. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981, 69, S119.
Sidtis, J. J., & Volpe, B. T. Right hemisphere lateralization of complex pitch perception: A possible basis for amusia. Neurology, 1981, 31, 101. (a)
Sidtis. J. J., & Volpe, B. T. Vocal pitch production in a patient with expressive dysprosody: A possible right hemisphere role in speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1981, 70,S52. (b)
Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B. T., Holtzman, J. D., Wilson, D. H., & Gazzaniga, M. S. Cognitive interaction after staged callosal section: Evidence for transfer of semantic interaction. Science, 1981, 212, 344 - 346.
Sidtis, J. J., Volpe, B.T., Wilson, D. H., Rayport, M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: Evidence for a continuum of generative capacity. Journal of Neuroscience, 1981, 1, 323 - 331.
Small, A. M., & Campbell, R. A. Masking of pulsed tones by bands of noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1961, 33, 1570 - 1576.
Smith, A. Speech and other functions after left (dominant) hemispherectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 1966, 29, 467 - 471.
Smith, A., & Burklund, C. W. Dominant hemispherectomy: Preliminary report on neuropsychological sequelae. Science, 1966, 153, 1280 - 1282.
Sparks, R., Goodglass, H., & Nickel, B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemispheric lesions. Cortex, 1970, 6, 249 - 260.
Speaks, C., Gray, T., Miller, J., & Rubens, A. B. Central auditory deficits and temporal-lobe lesions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1975,40, 192-205.
Spellacy, F. Lateral preferences in the identification of pattered stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Soeiety of America, 1970, 47, 547 - 578.
Spreen, 0., Benton, A. L., & Fincham, R. W. Auditory agnosia without aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 1965, 13, 84 - 92.
Springer, S. P., Sidtis, J., Wilson, D., & Gazzaniga, M. S. Left ear performance in dichotic listening following commissurotomy. Neuropsychologia, 1978, 16, 305 - 312.
Terhardt, E. Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Soeiety of America, 1974, 55, 1061 - 1069.
Thurlow, W. R., & Small, A. M. Pitch perception for certain periodic auditory stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 27, 132 - 137.
Tucker, D. M., Watson, R. T., & Heilman, K. M. Discrimination and evocation of affectively intoned speech in patients with right parietal disease. Neurology, 1977, 27, 947 - 950.
Van Lancker, D., & Fromkin, V. A. Tone and pitch perception. Paper presented to the Acoustical Society of America, 1972.
von Bekesy, G. Nonlinear distortion in the ear. In G. von Bekesy, Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-HiII, 1960.)
Wertheim, N. The amusias. In P. J. Vinken & G. W. Bruyn (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 4 ). Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969, 195 - 206.
Wertheim, N., & Botez, M. I. Receptive amusia: A clinical analysis. Brain, 1961, 84, 19 - 30.
Wightman, F. L. The pattern-transformation model of pitch. Journal of the Aeoustical Society of America, 1973, 54, 407 - 416.
Wightman, F. L., & Green, D. M. The perception of pitch. American Scientist, 1974, 62, 208 - 215.
Wolf, C. G. The processing of fundamental frequency in a dichotic matching task. Brain and Language,
4, 70-77.
Woolsey, C. N. Organization of cortical auditory system. In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.l, Sensory communication.New York: Wiley, 1961.
Zangwill, O. L. Speech and the minor hemisphere. Acta Neurologica Psychiatrica Belgica, 1967, 67, 1013 - 1020.
Zurif, E. B. Auditory lateralization: Prosodic and syntactic factors. Brain and Language, 1974, I, 391-404.
Zurif, E. B., & Mendelsohn, M. Hemispheric specialization for the perception of speech sounds: The influence of intonation and structure. Perception and Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 329 - 332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sidtis, J.J. (1984). Music, Pitch Perception, and the Mechanisms of Cortical Hearing. In: Gazzaniga, M.S. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2177-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2177-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2179-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2177-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive