Skip to main content

Abstract

A woman, about 40 years old, is observed living in a refrigerator packing case placed over a heated grate on a street in a large city. She has lived there for about 2 years. She is filthy, and is sometimes seen defecating and urinating on the street. She sometimes curses passersby. She sometimes accepts handouts, sometimes burns paper money given to her. It is midwinter, and temperatures are below freezing. Approached by city social workers, she refuses to enter a city shelter, claiming that the shelters are dangerous and that she prefers the streets. She claims that she manages very well the way she is. Approached by psychiatrists on a number of occasions, and asked to enter a hospital, she is abusive and refuses to speak with them. She is forcibly brought to a psychiatric hospital and involuntarily committed under a law that says such hospitalization is permissible if psychiatrists judge that a person is either a danger to himself/herself or a danger to others, or unable to appreciate that he/she needs psychiatric or medical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. That is, to psychiatry, clinical psychology, and to some aspects of social work. Since this book is geared to physicians, we will use the term “psychiatry” throughout.

    Google Scholar 

  2. We will generally not distinguish among the terms “mental disorder,” “mental disease,” and “mental illness” in our discussions.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Although Aristotle, the “founder” of natural law theory, claimed to have derived his ideas about the essence of normal human-hood from his empirical observations of statistically normal behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  4. cf. Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The foremost proponent of this point of view is the psychiatrist, Dr. Thomas Szasz. Thomas S. Szasz, The Myth of Mental Illness (New York: Hoeber-Harper, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Consider, is infertility a disease? If so, is the physician who does a tubal ligation or vasectomy making his patient ill?

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plato, The Republic, e.g., 61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For example, Darwinian theory discards the natural law notion that living species were designed with constant and unchangeable purposes, and replaces it with the idea that species can change as a result of environmental changes.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract, revised and edited Charles Frankle. (New York: Hafner, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For example, Skinnerian behaviorism and some versions of Freudian theory.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Trans. V. L. Dowdell (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. We are not claiming that there is a direct causal connection between the acceptance of autonomy ethics and the changes in psychiatric theory. More likely, it is a Zeitgeist phenomenon.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perhaps the most dramatic recent example of this change was the decision of the American Psychiatric Association to remove the diagnosis of homosexuality from its nosology of mental disorders.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edition) (Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1987), p. xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975). In fact, as we shall see, a general right to treatment for the involuntarily committed has never been established as a legal right in this country. We shall have more to say about the case when we speak of the right to refuse treatment and the right to treatment.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Natural law theorists usually held to the belief that we have an innate desire to stay alive.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wyatt v. Stickney, 325F. Supp. 781 (M.D. Ala. 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Szasz, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  19. We shall speak about this more when we deal with the insanity defense and the problem of free will.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kantian autonomy theory is based on the belief that instincts can be willfully overcome.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, Charles M. and Bernard Gert. Philosophy in Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, Bruce and Loren Siegel. The Rights of Mental Patients. New York: Avon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. V.L. Dowdell. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Michael S. Law and Psychiatry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner, Richard and Harold J. Schwartz (Eds.). Geriatric Psychiatry and the Law. New York: Plenum, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. Revised, trans. and ed. Charles Frankle. New York: Hafner, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Committee on Association Standards for Criminal Justice of the American Bar Association. Proposed Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards. (Annual Meeting, 1984) American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Alan. Law, Psychiatry and Morality. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, Thomas S. Law, Liberty, and Psychiatry. New York: Collier, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, Thomas S. The Myth of Mental Illness. New York: Hoeber-Harper, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt v. Stickney, 325F. Supp. 781 M.D. Ala. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kantor, J.E. (1989). Psychiatric Ethics. In: Medical Ethics for Physicians-in-Training. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1672-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1672-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1674-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1672-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics