Skip to main content

Origin and Evolutionary Relationships among Geomyoids

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series ((NSSA,volume 92))

Abstract

Contents, relationships, and origin of geomyoid rodents have been commented on quite differently during the past, in zoology as well as in paleontology. On the part of zoologists this superfamily contains the well defined families Heteromyidae and Geomyidae, both of them restricted more or less to North America. According to jaw musculature they are mostly assigned to the Sciuromorpha. Following Wilson’s (1949) revision of some Oligocene Eomyidae, these also were incorporated into the Geomyoidea by many paleontologists. Moreover, as Wilson (1949) discussed morphological relations to some myomorphs (in which, however, he did not put them), the whole superfamily later became attributed to the Myomorpha in paleontological literature (e.g. Wood, 1955a), a fact, I believe, with which zoologists became scarcely familiar. Some people even considered the whole group to be a separate suborder Geomorpha (Thaler, 1966). Due to the lack of adequate fossils, little is known of the origin of these rodents, except for some necessarily preliminary assumptions dealing with various groups of the Protrogomorpha as possible ancestors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Black, C. C. and Dawson, M. R. 1966. Paleontology and geology of the Badwater Creek Area, Central Wyoming. Part 1. History of field work and geological setting. Ann. Carneg. Mus. 31: 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. R. 1968. Middle Eocene rodents (Mammalia) from Northeastern Utah. Ann. Carneg. Mus. 39: 327–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, J. R. 1940. The Families and Genera of Living Rodents, Vol. 1. Rodents Other than Muridae. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emry, R. J. 1972. A new heteromyid rodent from the Early Oligocene of Natrona County, Wyoming. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 85: 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emry, R. J. 1981. New material of the Oligocene muroid rodent Nonomys, and its bearing on muroid origins. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2712: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emry, R. J. and Dawson, M. R. 1972. A unique cricetid (Rodentia, Mammalia) from the Early Oligocene of Natrona County, Wyoming. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2508: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emry, R. J. and Dawson, M. R. 1973. Nonomys, new name for the cricetid (Rodentia, Mammalia) genus Nanomys Emry and Dawson. J. Paleont. 47: 1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbusch, V. 1970. Populationsverschiebungen bei tertiären Nagetieren, eine Studie an oligozänen und miozänen Eomyidae Europas. Abh. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math.-naturw. K1., N. F. 145: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbusch, V. 1973. Die stammesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Eomyiden (Mammalia, Rodentia) Nordamerikas und Europas. Mitt. Bayer. Staatsslg. Paläont. hist. Geol. 13: 141–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbusch, V. 1979. Eomyidae-Geschichte einer Säugetierfamilie. Paläont. Z. 53: 88–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbusch, V., Qiu, Z., and Storch, G. 1983. Neogene mammalian faunas of Ertemte and Harr Obo in Nei Mongol, China. −1. Report on field work in 1980 and preliminary results. Scient. Sin. Ser. B. 26: 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawne, C. E. 1975. Rodents from the Zia Sand Miocene of New Mexico. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2586: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. M. and Wood, A. E. 1969. A new genus of eomyid rodent from the Oligocene Ash Spring Local Fauna of Trans-Pecos Texas. Texas Mem. Mus. Pearce-Sellards Ser. 14: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartenberger, J.-L. 1971. Contribution à l’étude des genres Gliravus et Microparamys (Rodentia) de l’Eocène d’Europe. Palaeovertebrata 4: 97–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-K. 1974. A probable geomyoid rodent from Middle Miocene of Linchu, Shantung. Vert. PalAsiat. 12: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillegraven, J. A. 1977. Small rodents (Mammalia) from Eocene deposits of San Diego County, California. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 158: 221–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensberger, J. M. 1971. Entoptychine pocket gophers (Mammalia, Geomyoidea) of the Early Miocene John Day Formation, Oregon. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 90: 1–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensberger, J. M. 1973a. Pleurolicine rodents (Geomyoidea) of the John Day Formation, Oregon. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Sci. 102: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensberger, J. M. 1973b. Sanctimus (Mammalia, Rodentia) and the phyletic relationships of the large Arikareean geomyoids. J. Paleont. 47: 835–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, L. 1966. Les rongeurs fossiles du Bas-Languedoc dans leur rapports avec l’histoire des faunes et la stratigraphie du Tertiaire d’Europe. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., sér. C. 17: 1–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troxell, E. L. 1923. Diplolophus, a new genus of rodents. Amer. J. Sci. 5: 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlert, J. H. 1978. Cranial foramina and relationships of the Eomyoidea (Rodentia, Geomorpha). Skull and upper teeth of Kansasimys. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2645: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlert, J. H. 1983. Relationships of the Florentiamyidae (Rodentia, Geomyoidea) based on cranial and dental morphology. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2769: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. W. 1940. Two new Eocene rodents from California. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 514: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. W. 1949. On some White River fossil rodents. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Publ. 584: 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E. 1936. A new subfamily of heteromyid rodents from the Miocene of Western United States. Amer. J. Sci. 31: 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E. 1955a. A revised classification of the rodents. J. Mammal. 36: 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E. 1955b. Rodents from the Lower Oligocene Yoder Formation of Wyoming. J. Paleont. 29: 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E. 1974. Early Tertiary vertebrate faunas Vieja Group, Trans-Pecos Texas: Rodentia. Texas Mem. Mus. Bull. 21: 1–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. E. 1980. The Oligocene rodents of North America. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 70: 1–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fahlbusch, V. (1985). Origin and Evolutionary Relationships among Geomyoids. In: Luckett, W.P., Hartenberger, JL. (eds) Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents. NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Series, vol 92. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0539-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0539-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0541-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0539-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics