Skip to main content

Abstract

The formula developed in the preceding chapter

$$b = 1/\int_0^\infty {{e^{ - ra}}p(a)} da$$
(33)

is in a certain sense incomplete. It expresses a relation between the birth rate b and the constant rate of increase r without, however, definitively fixing their values. For this a second, independent relation is required. Evidently there exists an essential factor of some sort that up to now has not entered into our computations. That factor is the fertility of the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • The period of reproduction is more precisely defined for women than for men, and maternal parentage is almost always known, even in the case of illegitimate children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potential fertility, a quantity whose measurement escapes us, will not interest us at all in this discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  • We note in passing that equation (134) still remains valid if p(a) and m(a) are functions of time t. However, in the present discussion we treat the case in which the life table and fertility by age are fixed.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Kuczynski, Fertility and Reproduction, 1932, pp. 62, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Translators’ note: These comments reflect Lotka’s irritation with Kuczynski, who did not understand the fundamental nature of Lotka’s contributions to stable theory and assigned credit for key parts of it, at least in concept, to Bortkiewicz. Lotka’s correction is accurate, if also strident. The various threads are disentangled in P. Samuelson, “Resolving a historical confusion in population analysis,” Human Biology,1976, v. 48,pp. 559–580; also in D. P. Smith and N. Keyfitz, editors, Mathematical Demography: Selected Papers,pp. 109–129. Springer—Verlag, Berlin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • See A. J. Lotka, “The progeny of a population element,” American Journal of Hygiene, 1928, v. 8, p. 900.

    Google Scholar 

  • We could equally write + 2’rtni upon making n span entirely negative values.

    Google Scholar 

  • It must be noted that the curves in the upper part of Figure 14 were traced only to complete the symmetry of the design. The values of u and v corresponding to points of intersection in the two upper quadrants should be rejected, as not satisfying the condition mentioned earlier, by which there is but one real root p, and the real part of every complex root is less than p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lotka, A.J. (1998). Relations Involving Fertility. In: Analytical Theory of Biological Populations. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9176-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9176-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9178-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9176-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics