Skip to main content
  • 498 Accesses

Abstract

Radioactivity logging began in the 1940s. Many improvements have been made since then, and several different types of measurements are used in well logging. The atomic nucleus has discrete rather than continuous stable states. When the nucleus changes from one stable state to another, this change is accompanied by the emission of atomic particles or energy. This process of emission of particles or energy is termed radioactivity. Radioactivity may be either induced or natural.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Author’s class notes from course on well log interpretation presented by George R. Pickett at the Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Tillman and J. S. Wahl, “The Physical Foundations of Formation Density Logging (Gamma-Gamma),” Geophysics 30, no. 2 (1965): 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Author’s class notes, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. G. Patchett and E. B. Coalson, “The Determination of Porosity in Sandstone and Shaly Sandstones, Part 2: Effects of Complex Mineralogy and Hydrocarbons,” paper presented at the 23rd Annual Logging Symposium of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Corpus Christi, July 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. E. Shultz, A. Nunley, J. G. Kampfer, and H. D. Smith, Jr., “Dual Detector Lithology Measurements with a New Spectral Density Log,” paper presented at the 26th Annual Logging Symposium of the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Dallas, June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Bertozzi, D. V. Ellis, and J. S. Wahl, “The Physical Foundations of Formation Lithology Logging with Gamma Rays,” Geophysics 46 no. 10 (1981): 14391455.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Gardner and J. L. Dumanoir, “Litho-Density Log Interpretation,” paper presented at the 21st Annual Logging Symposium of the Professional Society of Well Log Analysts, Lafayette, July 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. R. McGinley and T. M. McKnight, Jr., “Log-Derived Stratigraphic Reservoir Description,” SPE Paper 12897, Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, March 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts ( Schlumberger Ltd, New York, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Author’s class notes, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1,p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Author’s class notes, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schlumberger, Log Interpretation Charts (Schlumberger Ltd, New York, 1986 ), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. S. Allen, W. R. Mills, K. P. Desai, and R. L. Caldwell, “Some Features of Dual-Spaced Neutron Porosity Logging,” The Log Analyst 13, no. 4 (1972): pp. 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schlumberger, Log Interpretation, Volume 1,p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brian D. Gobran, Miguel A. Saldana, Susan L. Brown, and Subir K. Sanyal, “A Comprehensive Mathematical Approach and a Hand-held Calculator Program for Analysis of Shaly Gas Sands,” The Log Analyst 21, no. 5 (1980): 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gardner and Dumanoir, “Litho-Density Log Interpretation.”

    Google Scholar 

  27. Author’s class notes, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patchett and Coalson, “Determination of Porosity.”

    Google Scholar 

  29. Istvan Juhasz, “Normalized Qv-the Key to Shaly Sand Evaluation Using the Waxman-Smits Equation in the Absence of Core Data,” paper presented at the 22nd Annual Logging Symposium of the Professional Society of Well Log Analysts, June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Patchett and Coalson, “Determination of Porosity.”

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gardner and Dumanoir, “Litho-Density Log Interpretation.”

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patchett and Coalson, “Determination of Porosity.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Etnyre, L.M. (1989). Radioactivity Logging. In: Finding Oil and Gas from Well Logs. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5230-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5230-4_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-5232-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5230-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics