Skip to main content

The Temporal Dimension of R&D Evaluation: Incorporating Spin-Off Benefits

  • Chapter
Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice

Abstract

R&D evaluation has many temporal dimensions. As levels of support, management, and R&D needs change, the characteristics of most R&D programs evolve. The external context of R&D programs typically changes as the economy cycles and new technological, socio-economic, and environmental problems are identified. There are also temporal dimensions to program impacts. For instance, benefits from applied R&D projects typically accrue over the short term as R&D is translated into commercial products or applied to solve the identified problems. Other benefits, however, are long-term in nature, and are realized only after an extended development period during which planned and/or unanticipated benefits may spin off. These temporal aspects complicate the measurement of the R&D impacts and necessitate periodic monitoring, sometimes covering an extended time period, to identify the full range of R&D impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, M. A., C. R. Wilson, and C. A. Franchuk. 1992. The Energy-Related Inventions Program: A Decade of Commercial Progress. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/CON-339, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaing, J. T. 1991. “The Potential of ‘Spin-offs’ from a System Perspective,” Technology in Society 13: 279–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office. 1988. “Using Federal R&D to Promote 243–249, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehretsmann, J., A. Hinkly, A. Minty, and A. W. Pearson. 1989. “The Commercialization of Stagnant Technologies,” R&D Management 19(3): 231242, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomory, R. E. 1989. “From the `Ladder of Science’ to the Product Development Cycle”, HarvaR&D Business Review 67(6): 99–105, November/December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S. and R. HowaR&D. 1989. “Rethinking the Military’s Role in the Economy: An Interview with Harvey Brooks and Lewis Branscomb”, Technology Review 92(6): 54–64, August/September.

    Google Scholar 

  • HeR&Dan, B L. 1987. “Civil Spin-Off from Defence Research: A Fresh Approach,” Long-Range Planning 20(1): 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luchsinger, V. P. and J. Van Blois. 1989. “Spin-Offs from Military Technology: Past and Future”, International Journal of Technology Management 4(1): 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. H. and E. B. Roberts. 1986. “New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study”, Management Science 32(7): 806–821, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morone, J. and R. Ivins. 1982. “Problems and Opportunities in Technology Transfer From the National Laboratories to Industries”, Research Management 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, C. 1986. “Choosing the Mechanisms to Help Your Innovation Thrive”, International Management 41(3): 26–27, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorke, M. L. and H. C. Livesay. 1986. A Longitudinal Examination of the Energy-Related Inventions Program. Rockville, Maryland: Mohawk Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenburg, N. 1987. “Civilian `Spillovers’ from Military R&D Spending: The U.S. Experience Since World War II”, Strategic Defense and the Western Alliance 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. and P. GaR&Diner. 1989. “The Strategic Management of Re-Innovation”, R&D Management 19: 2, 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, B. 1984. “The Military Boost to Industry,” Fortune 112(9): 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, J. G., M. S. Crandall, and W. E. Crane. 1980. “Measuring the Societal Benefits of Innovation”, Science, 209: 658–662, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Defense. 1989. “SDI Technology Transfer to the U.S. Public and Private Sectors”, The SDI Technology Applications Program, Strategic Defense Initiative, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroman, S. B. and L. B. Russell. 1987. “The Net Social Benefits of a Product Improvement: The Case of Freeze-Dried Coffee”, Applied Economics 19(1): 127–142, January.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, M.A., Wilson, C.R. (1993). The Temporal Dimension of R&D Evaluation: Incorporating Spin-Off Benefits. In: Bozeman, B., Melkers, J. (eds) Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5135-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5182-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics