Skip to main content

U.S. Evaluation of Strategic Research: Closing the Gap with Europe and Japan

  • Chapter
Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice
  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

In the 1980s, a gap seemed to open between the level of research evaluation activity in the United States and the level in Europe and Japan. The surge in European efforts in retrospective research evaluation began at the Commission of the European Communities in the late 1970s. The Commission sponsored a series of conferences in the 1970s and 1980s to discuss the idea of research evaluation in the European context and to assess progress. By the mid-1980s, all Community research programs were on a regular schedule of evaluation (see Boggio and Spachis-Papazois, 1984.) Following closely behind, individual Community nations, including France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, began to gear up for appraisal of their local institutions (see Gamier, 1983; Moed et al., 1985; Department of Trade and Industry, 1988), and the Nordic countries collectively increased their expertise and activity (see Ormala, 1987). The European Community eventually established a network of evaluation methodologists, allowing countries and Community alike to share knowledge and experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asahi Research Centre. 1982. Review of Methods of Research Evaluation. Report to Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asahi Research Centre. 1983. Review of Methods of Research Evaluation Abroad and in the Japanese Private Sector. Report to Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H. 1990. “Policy Uses of the ‘Evaluation of Research’ Literature.” Background paper for the Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States. NTIS PB91–166645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barré, Rémi. 1990. “Strategic Processes and SandT Indicators: Towards a Key Role in RandD Management Systems.” In S. Cozzens et al. (Eds.) The Research System in Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Hans-Jürgen. 1990. “The University System in Transition: Possibilities and Limitations of Universities in the ‘Steady State”’ In S. Cozzens et al., editors, The Research System in Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggio, G., and E. Spachis-Papazois. 1984. Evaluation of Research and Development: Methodologies for RandD Evaluation in the European Community Member States, The United States of America and Japan. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Science and Technology, Policy Committee, Prime Minister’s Office, and Committee on Guidelines for Research Evaluation. 1986. Basic View on Research Evaluation. Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Science and Technology, Policy Committee, Prime Minister’s Office, and Committee on Guidelines for Research Evaluation. 1986. Guidelines on Research Evaluation. Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, Susan E. 1987. “Expert review in evaluating programs.” Science and Public Policy 14 2: 71–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, Susan E., et al., editors, The Research System in Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy. 1982. An Assessment of the Basic Energy Sciences Program. DOE/ER-0123. Washington, DC: Office of Energy Research, Office of Program Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry, United Kingdom. 1988. Evaluation of RandD-A Policymaker’s Perspective. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasella, P. 1984. “The Evaluation of the European Community’s Research and Development Programmes.” In G. Boggio and E. Spachis-Papazois, Evaluation of Research and Development. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier, Patrick. 1983. “L’Evaluation des Programmes de la Recherche Scientifique.” Summary of a seminar on evaluation of programs in the major French research organizations. Paris: Ministry of Research and Industry, October 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. 1990. “Strategic Policy for Science.” In S. Cozzens et al., editors, The Research System in Transition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. 1988. Evaluating Applied Research: Lesson from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. and B. Martin. 1986. “British Science Evaluation Methods.” Testimony before the U.S. House Science and Technology Committee. Published as Vol. 13, Task Force on Science Policy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. 1988. “Evaluation of Proposed and Existing Accelerated Research Programs of the Office of Naval Research.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (Nov): 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krull, W. 1992. “The Evaluation and Restructuring of Non-University Research Institutions in East Germany by the Science Council-An Overview.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Methodologies for Evaluating the Future Potential of Research Institutions, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 23–25 March. Sponsored by the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, J. et al. 1978. Evaluative Study of the Materials Research Laboratory Program. Washington, DC: The Mitre Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R. and J. Irvine. 1983. “Assessing Basic Research: Some Partial Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radio Astronomy.” Research Policy 12: 6190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Frankfort, and A. F. J. van Raan. 1985. “The Use of Bibliometric Data for the Measurement of University Research Performance.” Research Policy 14: 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States. 1986. Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States. 1991. Federally-Funded Research: Decisions for a Decade, OTA-SET 490. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 1987. Evaluation of Research: A Selection of Current Practices Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormala, E. 1989. “Nordic Experiences of the Evaluation of Technical Research and Development.” Research Policy 18 (6): 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek de Solla. 1965. “The scientific foundations of science policy.” Nature (17 April): 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cozzens, S.E. (1993). U.S. Evaluation of Strategic Research: Closing the Gap with Europe and Japan. In: Bozeman, B., Melkers, J. (eds) Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5135-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5182-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics