Skip to main content

Methods for Evaluating the Return on R&D Investments

  • Chapter
Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice

Abstract

Research and development (R&D) in one of the most important investments that a technology-based organization makes. R&D is a fundamental input into the innovation process, and innovation is an important factor that influences productivity, productivity growth, and competitiveness. This causal relationship may seem obvious for the private sector firms, but it also applies to R&D-dependent public organizations that seek to improve their performance and that bestow positive externalities on the private sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, T.J., Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F.M. (ed.), Scientific Productivity, London: Cambridge University Press and Unesco, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I., “Evaluation of Applied RandD in a Firm,” in Technological Planning at the Corporate Level, J.R. Bright (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augood, D., “A Review of RandD Evaluation Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-20 (4), November 1973, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azumi, K. and F. Hull, “Inventive Payoff from RandD in Japanese Industry: Convergence with the West,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (1), February 1990, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N.R. and J.R. Freeland, “Recent Advanced in RandD Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods,” Management Science (21) 10, June 1975, 1164 1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, J.F., R. Balachandra, and P.E. Kaufmann, “An Incentive Approach to RandD Project Selection and Termination,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (3), August 1988, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K., “A Simulation Model of RandD Budgeting,” R&D Management 19 (3), July 1989, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, “Multifactor Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing and in 20 Manufacturing Industries, 1949–1986,” mimeo, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetron, M.J., J. Martins, and L. Roepoke, “The Selection of RandD Program Content–Survey of Quantitative Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM14 (1), March 1967, 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles River Associates, “Productivity Impacts of RandD Laboratories: The National Bureau of Standards’ Semiconductor Program,” Final Report, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D.W., “Measuring the Performance of RandD Departments,” Research Management, March 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danila, N., “Strategic Evaluation and Selection of RandD Projects,” R&D Management 19 (1), January 1989, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, G., “Investment in Technology,” in Technology and Management, Ray Wild (ed.), New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R.N., L.H. Linden, R.L. Whiteley, and A.M. Kantrow, “Improving the Return on RandD - I,” Research Management, January/February 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, B., “Some Key Problems in Evaluating RandD Performance,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 6, 1989: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.L. and A. Nauda, “An Interactive Approach for Selecting IRandD Projects,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Business School, “General Foods – Productivity Management Program,” Harvard Business School case 9–682–072, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M.H., “Rate Your Company’s Research Productivity,” Harvard Business Review 41 (6), November/December 1963, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg, “An Overview of Innovation,” in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds.), Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuwahara, Y. and Y. Takeda, “A Managerial Approach to Research and Development Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 134–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyden, D.P. and A.N. Link, Government’s Role in Innovation, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., Technological Change and Productivity Growth, London: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., “Economic Impacts of NIST-Supported Standards on the U.S. Optical Fiber Industry: 1981-Present,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., “Economic Impacts on the U.S. Semiconductor Industry of NIST Research in Electromigration,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N., “Estimates of the Economic Impact of NIST Research in Electromagnetic Compatability/Interference Metrology,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and L.L. Bauer, Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing: Assessing Policy Initiatives and Corporate Strategies, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and B. Bozeman, “Innovation in Small-Sized Firms,” Small Business Economics, September 1991, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and J. Rees, “Firm Size, University-Based Research, and the Returns to RandD,” Small Business Economics, April 1990, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A.N. and G. Tassey, Strategies for Technology-Based Competition: Meeting the New Global Challenge, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipetz, B., The Measurement of Efficiency of Scientific Research, Carlisle, Mass.: Intermedia, Inc., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., et al., “Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1977, 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, F., “The Control of Research Funds,” in Coordinating, Control and Financing of Industrial Research, A.H. Rubenstein (ed.), New York: Kings Crown Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, R.A. and D.S. Remer, “Measuring RandD Productivity,” Research Management, May/June 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, W., “Evaluating RandD Performance at Alcoa Laboratories,” Research Management, March/April 1983, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, A.W., “The Management of Research and Development,” in Technology and Management, Ray Wild (ed.), New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.G., Jr., “Post Audits–An Aid to Research Planning,” Research Management 21 (1), January 1978, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranftl, R.M., “Improving RandD Productivity - A Study Program and Its Applications,” Research Management, January 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringuest, J.L. and S.B. Graves, “The Linear RandD Project Selection Problem: An Alternative to Net Present Value,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, A.H. and E. Geisler, “The Use of Indicators and Measures of the RandD Process in Evaluating Science and Technology Programs,” in Government Innovation Policy, David Roessner (ed.), New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, A.H. and E. Geisler, “Evaluating the Outputs and Impacts of RandD/Innovation,” International Journal of Technology Management, 1991: 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W.A., “Measuring Knowledge Worker Productivity,” Paper presented at the Conference on Productivity Research, American Productivity Center, April 20–24, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schainblatt, A.H., “How Companies Measure the Productivity of Engineers and Scientists,” Research Management, May 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schainblatt, A.H., “Measuring the Productivity of Scientists and Engineers in RandD: A State of the Practice Review,” The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W.A., “A System for Using RandD Project Evaluation Methods,” Research Management, September 1978, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W.A., Managing New Product Innovation, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W.A. and T. Mandakovic, “RandD Project Selection Models,” Research Management 29 (4), July/August 1986, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, M.J. and J.A. Steger, “Measuring Innovation and Productivity–A Peer Rating Approach,” Research Management 20 (1), January, 1977, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauss, K.H., “A Pragmatic Approach to Evaluating RandD Programs,” Research Management, September 1975, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G., “The Functions of Technology Infrastructure in a Competitive Economy,” Research Policy 20, 1991, 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, J.G., et al., “Measuring the Societal Benefits of Innovation,” Science 209 (8), August 1980, 658–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thor, C.G., “Productivity Program Development and Measurement in a Technical Group,” Proceedings on the Conference on Improving the Productivity of Technical Resources, Chicago: IIT Manufacturing Center, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vepsalainen, A.P.J. and G.L. Lauro, “Analysis of RandD Portfolio Strategies for Contract Competition,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (3), August 1988, 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink, D.A., “Monitoring the Adequacy of the Advancement and Productivity of Engineers and Construction Manpower,” 1980 Transactions of the American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, W.Va.: American Association of Cost Engineers, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Link, A.N. (1993). Methods for Evaluating the Return on R&D Investments. In: Bozeman, B., Melkers, J. (eds) Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5135-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5182-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics