Abstract
Research and development (R&D) in one of the most important investments that a technology-based organization makes. R&D is a fundamental input into the innovation process, and innovation is an important factor that influences productivity, productivity growth, and competitiveness. This causal relationship may seem obvious for the private sector firms, but it also applies to R&D-dependent public organizations that seek to improve their performance and that bestow positive externalities on the private sector.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T.J., Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1978.
Andrews, F.M. (ed.), Scientific Productivity, London: Cambridge University Press and Unesco, 1979.
Ansoff, H.I., “Evaluation of Applied RandD in a Firm,” in Technological Planning at the Corporate Level, J.R. Bright (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964.
Augood, D., “A Review of RandD Evaluation Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-20 (4), November 1973, 114–120.
Azumi, K. and F. Hull, “Inventive Payoff from RandD in Japanese Industry: Convergence with the West,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (1), February 1990, 3–9.
Baker, N.R. and J.R. Freeland, “Recent Advanced in RandD Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods,” Management Science (21) 10, June 1975, 1164 1175.
Bard, J.F., R. Balachandra, and P.E. Kaufmann, “An Incentive Approach to RandD Project Selection and Termination,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (3), August 1988, 139–146.
Brockhoff, K., “A Simulation Model of RandD Budgeting,” R&D Management 19 (3), July 1989, 265–275.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, “Multifactor Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing and in 20 Manufacturing Industries, 1949–1986,” mimeo, 1989.
Cetron, M.J., J. Martins, and L. Roepoke, “The Selection of RandD Program Content–Survey of Quantitative Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM14 (1), March 1967, 4–13.
Charles River Associates, “Productivity Impacts of RandD Laboratories: The National Bureau of Standards’ Semiconductor Program,” Final Report, May 1981.
Collier, D.W., “Measuring the Performance of RandD Departments,” Research Management, March 1977.
Danila, N., “Strategic Evaluation and Selection of RandD Projects,” R&D Management 19 (1), January 1989, 47–62.
Edge, G., “Investment in Technology,” in Technology and Management, Ray Wild (ed.), New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1990.
Foster, R.N., L.H. Linden, R.L. Whiteley, and A.M. Kantrow, “Improving the Return on RandD - I,” Research Management, January/February 1985.
Gold, B., “Some Key Problems in Evaluating RandD Performance,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 6, 1989: 59–70.
Hall, D.L. and A. Nauda, “An Interactive Approach for Selecting IRandD Projects,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 126–133.
Harvard Business School, “General Foods – Productivity Management Program,” Harvard Business School case 9–682–072, 1982.
Hodge, M.H., “Rate Your Company’s Research Productivity,” Harvard Business Review 41 (6), November/December 1963, 109–122.
Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg, “An Overview of Innovation,” in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Ralph Landau and Nathan Rosenberg (eds.), Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1986.
Kuwahara, Y. and Y. Takeda, “A Managerial Approach to Research and Development Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 134–138.
Leyden, D.P. and A.N. Link, Government’s Role in Innovation, Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.
Link, A.N., Technological Change and Productivity Growth, London: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987.
Link, A.N., “Economic Impacts of NIST-Supported Standards on the U.S. Optical Fiber Industry: 1981-Present,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992a.
Link, A.N., “Economic Impacts on the U.S. Semiconductor Industry of NIST Research in Electromigration,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992b.
Link, A.N., “Estimates of the Economic Impact of NIST Research in Electromagnetic Compatability/Interference Metrology,” Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1992c.
Link, A.N. and L.L. Bauer, Cooperative Research in U.S. Manufacturing: Assessing Policy Initiatives and Corporate Strategies, Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1989.
Link, A.N. and B. Bozeman, “Innovation in Small-Sized Firms,” Small Business Economics, September 1991, 179–184.
Link, A.N. and J. Rees, “Firm Size, University-Based Research, and the Returns to RandD,” Small Business Economics, April 1990, 25–32.
Link, A.N. and G. Tassey, Strategies for Technology-Based Competition: Meeting the New Global Challenge, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1989.
Lipetz, B., The Measurement of Efficiency of Scientific Research, Carlisle, Mass.: Intermedia, Inc., 1965.
Mansfield, E., et al., “Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1977, 221–240.
Olsen, F., “The Control of Research Funds,” in Coordinating, Control and Financing of Industrial Research, A.H. Rubenstein (ed.), New York: Kings Crown Press, 1955.
Pappas, R.A. and D.S. Remer, “Measuring RandD Productivity,” Research Management, May/June 1985.
Patterson, W., “Evaluating RandD Performance at Alcoa Laboratories,” Research Management, March/April 1983, 23–27.
Pearson, A.W., “The Management of Research and Development,” in Technology and Management, Ray Wild (ed.), New York: Nichols Publishing Company, 1990.
Porter, J.G., Jr., “Post Audits–An Aid to Research Planning,” Research Management 21 (1), January 1978, 28–30.
Ranftl, R.M., “Improving RandD Productivity - A Study Program and Its Applications,” Research Management, January 1977.
Ringuest, J.L. and S.B. Graves, “The Linear RandD Project Selection Problem: An Alternative to Net Present Value,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 37 (2), May 1990, 143–146.
Rubenstein, A.H. and E. Geisler, “The Use of Indicators and Measures of the RandD Process in Evaluating Science and Technology Programs,” in Government Innovation Policy, David Roessner (ed.), New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988.
Rubenstein, A.H. and E. Geisler, “Evaluating the Outputs and Impacts of RandD/Innovation,” International Journal of Technology Management, 1991: 181–204.
Ruch, W.A., “Measuring Knowledge Worker Productivity,” Paper presented at the Conference on Productivity Research, American Productivity Center, April 20–24, 1980.
Schainblatt, A.H., “How Companies Measure the Productivity of Engineers and Scientists,” Research Management, May 1982.
Schainblatt, A.H., “Measuring the Productivity of Scientists and Engineers in RandD: A State of the Practice Review,” The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., May 1981.
Souder, W.A., “A System for Using RandD Project Evaluation Methods,” Research Management, September 1978, 29–37.
Souder, W.A., Managing New Product Innovation, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1986.
Souder, W.A. and T. Mandakovic, “RandD Project Selection Models,” Research Management 29 (4), July/August 1986, 36–42.
Stahl, M.J. and J.A. Steger, “Measuring Innovation and Productivity–A Peer Rating Approach,” Research Management 20 (1), January, 1977, 35–38.
Tauss, K.H., “A Pragmatic Approach to Evaluating RandD Programs,” Research Management, September 1975, 13–15.
Tassey, G., “The Functions of Technology Infrastructure in a Competitive Economy,” Research Policy 20, 1991, 345–361.
Tewksbury, J.G., et al., “Measuring the Societal Benefits of Innovation,” Science 209 (8), August 1980, 658–662.
Thor, C.G., “Productivity Program Development and Measurement in a Technical Group,” Proceedings on the Conference on Improving the Productivity of Technical Resources, Chicago: IIT Manufacturing Center, 1980.
Vepsalainen, A.P.J. and G.L. Lauro, “Analysis of RandD Portfolio Strategies for Contract Competition,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 35 (3), August 1988, 181–186.
Zink, D.A., “Monitoring the Adequacy of the Advancement and Productivity of Engineers and Construction Manpower,” 1980 Transactions of the American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, W.Va.: American Association of Cost Engineers, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Link, A.N. (1993). Methods for Evaluating the Return on R&D Investments. In: Bozeman, B., Melkers, J. (eds) Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5182-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5135-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5182-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive