Skip to main content

Abstract

In this paper I’d like to expose the view of Information Systems Development (ISD) processes as discursive practices, the view that puts the politics of meaning making and interpretation at centre stage. Such a view aims to assist deconstruction of discursive regimes instituted by ISD processes and methodologies, the production of representations and legitimation of meaning (through business process models, information requirements specifications, databases, knowledge bases, procedures, rules, etc.) within a particular social, political and economic context and power relations. To achieve this aim I will propose a discursive framework for examining ISD that highlights particular distinctions among ISD processes as organisational discourses: on one hand, ISD are seen as sites of domination, hegemonic consent, and colonisation of meaning, and on the other, as sites of dissensus discourses, multiple value and interest positions, and the struggle for democratic change and emancipation of meaning. By drawing from three published examples of ISD research, I will illustrate the nature of these distinctions and the type of analysis enabled by the proposed discursive ISD framework and will also demonstrate the relevance of new insights thus gained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Karreman, D., 2000, Taking the linguistic turn in organisational research, The Journal of Applied behavioral Science, 36, 2: 136–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. and Willmott, H., 1992, On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies, Academy of Management Review, 17, 3: 432–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaro, P.M., 2000, Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design, Accounting, Management and Information Technology, 10: 257–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.L., 1966, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. and Star, S.L., 1994, Knowledge and infrastructure in international information management: Problems of classification and coding, in: Information Acumen. The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, L. Bud-Friennan, ed., Routledge, London, pp. 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. and Morgan, G., 1979, Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, London. Carspecken, P.F., 1999, Four Scenes for Posing the Question of Meaning and Other Essays in Critical Philosophy and Critical Methodology, New York, Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., 2003, ISD as discursive practices-revisiting research paradigms, SISTM research paper, Faculty of Commerce and Economics, UNSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. and Janson, M., 2002, Information Systems and rationalisation of organisations: An exploratory study. The European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2002, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Janson, M. and Brown, A., 2002, The rationality framework for a critical study of Information Systems, the Journal of Information Technology, 17: 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S., 1995, Transforming Communication, Transforming Business: Building Responsive and Responsible Workplaces, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S., 1996, Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy, Organization Science, 7, 2: 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S., 2000, Putting the community into organizational science, Organization Science 11,6: 733–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K., 1994, The art and politics of interpretation, in: Handbook of Qualitative Research, N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 500–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J., 1996, Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse (r d ed.), London, Taylor Francis. Gramsci, A., 1986, Selections from Prison Notebooks (ed. and trans. Q. Hoare and G. Smith ), New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C., 1997, Organizational discourses: Text and context, Organization, 4, 2: 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action - Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Vol I ), Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., 1987, The theory of Communicative Action - The Critique of Functionalist Reason (Vol II ), Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., Palmer, I. and Phillips, N., 2000, Discourse as a strategic resource, Human Relations, 53, 9: 1227–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirchheim, R.A. and Klein, H.K., 1989, Four paradigms of Information System Development, Communication of the ACM, 32, 10: 1199–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirchheim, R.A. and Klein, H.K., 1994, Realizing emancipatory principles in Information Systems Development: The case for ETHICS, MISQ, 18, 1: 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. and Lyytinen, K., 1995, Information Systems Development and Data Modelling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations,Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, M. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., 2003, Information Systems and the participatory ethos, The European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2003, Naples, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T., Marshak, R.J., Oswick, C., and Grant, D., 2000, The discourse of organizing, The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 36, 2: 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, L.J. and McLaren, P., 1994, Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research, in: Handbook of qualitative research, N.K. Denzin and Y.D. Linkoln, eds, Sage, London, pp. 279–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M. and Banville, C., 1992, A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research, Accounting, Management, and Information Technology, 2, 2: 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J., 1993, Discourse, dynamics, and social change, Cultural Dynamics, 6: 243–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J., 1995, Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics, London, Taylor Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molineux, J., 1998, The application of a Dynamic System Model to the process of contestability in the Human Resources section of the ATO, in: the Proceedings of the 4th Australia and New Zealand Systems Conference on Creative Systems Practice, Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 234–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, S., Cohen, L. and Musson, G., 2003, Understanding Organizations through Language, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, T.S., 1999, The challenge of emancipation in Information Systems implementation: A case study in an NHS Trust Hospital, Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F.A., 1997, The truth is out there: The search for emancipatory principles in Information Systems design, Information Technology and People, 10, 3: 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2004). ISD Discourses and the Emancipation of Meaning. In: Linger, H., et al. Constructing the Infrastructure for the Knowledge Economy. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4852-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4852-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3459-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-4852-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics