Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 6))

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of case-based decision making has recently been proposed as an alternative to expected utility theory. It combines concepts and principles from both decision theory and case-based reasoning. Loosely speaking, a case-based decision maker learns by storing already experienced decision problems, along with a rating of the results. Whenever a new problem needs to be solved, possible actions are assessed on the basis of experience from similar situations in which these actions have already been applied. We formalize case-based decision making within the framework of fuzzy sets and possibility theory. The basic idea underlying this approach is to give preference to acts which have always led to good results for problems which are similar to the current one. We also propose two extensions of the basic model. Firstly, we deal separately with situations where an agent has made very few, if any, observations. Obviously, such situations are difficult to handle for a case-based approach. Secondly, we propose a reasonable relaxation of the original decision principle, namely to look for acts which have yielded good results, not necessarily for all, but at least for most cases in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier C. (1994), “Toward a logic for qualitative design theory”, in Doyle J., Sandewall E., Torasso P. (eds.), Proceedings KR-94, 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Bonn, Germany,75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brafmann R., Tennenholtz M. (1996), “On the foundation of qualitative decision theory”, in Proceedings AAAI-96, 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-Press, 1291–1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti B. (1937), “La prévision: Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives”, Annales de L’Institut Henri Poincaré, VII, 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J., Dean T. “Strategic directions in artificial intelligence”, AI Magazine,18(1) 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., de Berre D., Prade H., Sabbadin R. (1999), “Using possibilistic logic for modeling qualitative decision: ATMS-Based algorithms”, Fundamenta Informaticae, 37, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Esteva F., Garcia P., Godo L., de Mantaras R.L., Prade H. (1997), “Fuzzy modelling of case-based reasoning and decision”, in Leake D.B., Plaza E. (eds.), Case-based Reasoning Research and Development, Proceedings ICCBR-97, Springer-Verlag, 599–610.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Godo L., Prade H., Zapico A. (1998), “Making decision in a qualitative setting: from decision under uncertainty to case-based decision”, in Cohn A. G., Schubert L., Shapiro S. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-98), Trento, Italy, 594–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Nakata M., Prade H. (1997), “Extended divisions for flexible queries in relational databases”, Technical Report 97–43 R, IRIT–Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Universite Paul Sabatier, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1995), “Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory”, in Proceedings IJCAI-95, 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, 1924–1930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1997), “A fuzzy set approach to case-based decision”, in Felix R. (ed.), EFDAN-97, 2nd European Workshop on Fuzzy Decision Analysis and Neural Networks for Management, Planning and Optimization,, Dortmund, Germany, 1–9. A revised version has appeared in Reusch B., Temme K.H. (eds) (2001), Computational Intelligence: Theory and Practice, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. (1999), “A unified view of ranking techniques for fuzzy numbers”, Proceedings FUZZ-IEEE-99, Seoul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H., Sabbadin R. (1998), “Qualitative decision theory with Sugeno integrals”, in Proceedings UAI-94, 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H., Testemale C. (1988), “Weighted fuzzy pattern matching”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H., Yager R. R. (1999), “Merging fuzzy information”, in Bezdek J. C., Dubois D., Prade H. (eds), Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 335–401.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fargier H., Lang J., Schiex T. (1996), “Mixed constraint satisfaction: a framework for decision problems under incomplete knowledge”, in Proceedings AAAI-96, 13th Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine T. L. (1973), Theories of Probability, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I. (1987), “Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probability”, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 16, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., D. Schmeidler (1996), “Case-based optimisation”, Games and Economic Behavior, 15 (1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1995), “Case-based decision theory”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (4), 605–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1997), “Act similarity in case-based decision theory”, Economic Theory, 9, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (2001), A Theory of Case-Based Decision, Cambridge University Press, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heckermann D., Geiger D., Chickering D. (1995), “Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data”, Machine Learning; 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz E.J., Breese J.S., Henrion M. (1988), “Decision theory in expert systems and artificial intelligence”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2, 247–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüllermeier E. (1998), “A Bayesian approach to case-based probabilistic reasoning”, in Proceedings IPMU-98, International Conference on Information Proceeding and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Paris, La Sorbonne, July, Editions E.D.K, 1296–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüllermeier E. (1999), “A possibilistic formalization of case-based reasoning and decision making”, in Reusch B. (ed.), Proceeding of the 6`h International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Dortmund, Germany, May, 1625, 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüllermeier E., Dubois D., Prade H. (1999), “Extensions of a qualitative approach to case-based decision making: Uncertainty and fuzzy quantification in act evaluation”, in Zimmermann H.J. (ed.), EUFIT-99, 7 European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing, Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner J.L. (1993), Case-based reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. (1993), “From qualitative utility to conditional ”ought to“”, in Heckerman D., Mamdani H. (eds.), Proceedings International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Mateo, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerol J.C. (1997), “Artificial intelligence and human decision making”, European Journal of Operational Research, 99, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prade H., Yager R.R. (1994), “Estimations of expectedness and potential surprise in possibility theory”, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey F.P. (1931), “Truth and probability”, in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbeck C.K., Schank R.C. (1989), Inside Case-based Reasoning. Hillsdale, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell S. J., Wefald E. (1991), “Principles of metareasoning”, Artificial Intelligence, 49, 361–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell S.J., Norvig P. (1995), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall,New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage L.J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D. (1989), “Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity”, Economica, 57, 571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan S.W., Pearl J. (1994), “Qualitative decision theory”, in Proceedings AAAI-94, 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, 928–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1953), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P. (1990), “A behaviour foundation for fuzzy measures”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 37, 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R.R. (1985), “Aggregating evidence using quantified statements”, Information Sciences, 36, 179–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1965), “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Hüllermeier, E., Prade, H. (2003). Possibilistic case-based decisions. In: Lesage, C., Cottrell, M. (eds) Connectionist Approaches in Economics and Management Sciences. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3722-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3722-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5379-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3722-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics