Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Computational Management Science ((AICM,volume 6))

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical study of a set of hedge funds on recent periods. Alternative investments are now widely used by institutional investors and numerous studies highlight the main features of such investments. As they are in general poorly correlated with the main world indexes, traditional asset pricing models yield poor adjustments, partially because of potential non-linearities in pay-off functions. Some funds, however, exhibit high reward to variability ratios and can advantageously be incorporated in a portfolio in a diversification perspective. After describing the dataset, we classify the funds employing the Kohonen algorithm. We then cross the classification with the one based on the style of strategies involved, wondering if such categories are enough homogeneous to be relevant. The map of funds allows to characterize families of funds — whose conditional densities are different one to another — and to define a representative fund for each class. The structure of the network of funds is then described. In particular, we measure inter-class similarities and visualize them both on the network of funds and via a map of one-to-one distances between representative funds. Finally, we underline some of characteristics of classified fund families that may interest investors such as performance measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal V., Naik N. (2000-a), “Multi-period Persistence Analysis of Hedge Funds”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 327–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal V., Naik N. (2000-b), “Characterizing Systematic Risk of Hedge Funds with Buy-and-hold and Option-based Strategies”, LBS working paper,IFA n°300, August, 51 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T. (1984), An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley Editor, 2nd Edition, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake E., Elton M., Gruber C. (1999), “Common Factors in Active and Passive Portfolios”, European Finance Review, 3(1), 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blayo F., Demartines P. (1991), “Data Analysis: How to Compare Kohonen Neural Networks to Other Techniques?”, in Proceedings of IWANN’91 Conference, Springer, 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno G., Vandewalle N., Mantegna R. (2000), “Taxonomy of Stock Market Indices”, Physical Review E 62(6), December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden R. “The Ordered Mean Difference as a Portfolio Performance Measure”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 195–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S., Goetzmann W. (1997), “Mutual Fund Styles”, Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S., Goetzmann W. (2001), “Hedge Funds with Styles”, NBER Working Paper n° w8173, March, 37 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauveau T., Maillet B. (2001), “Performance with Restricted Borrowing: A Generalisation of Usual Measures”, in Proceedings of EFMA’01 Conference, Lugano, June, 46 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor G., Korajczyk R. (1986), “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (3), 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., Fort J.C., Pagès G. (1995) “Two or Three Things that We Know about the Kohonen Algorithm”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN ‘84 Conference, D Facto, Bruxelles, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., de Bodt E. (1996), “A Kohonen Map Representations to Avoid Misleading Interpretations”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN’96 Conference, D Facto, Bruxelles, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., de Bodt E. (2000), “Bootstrapping Self-organizing Maps to Assess the Statistical Significance of Local Proximity”, in Verleysen M. (ed.), Proceedings of ESANN’00 Conference, D Facto, Bruges, 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., Girard B., Girard Y., Muller C., Rousset P. (1995-a), “Daily Electrical Power Curves: Classification and Forecasting Using a Kohonen Map, From Natural to Artificial Neural Computation”, Proceedings of IWANN’95 Conference,Springer, 1107–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., Girard B., Girard Y., M. Mangeas (1995-b), `Neural Modelling for Time Series: A Statistical Stepwise Method for Weight Elimination“, IEEE Tr. on Neural Networks,6(6), November, 1355–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., Fort J.-C., Pagès G. (1998-a), “Theoretical Aspects of the SOM Algorithm”, Neuro Computing, 21, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M., Girard B., Rousset P. (1998-b), “Forecasting of Curves Using a Kohonen Classification”, Journal of Forecasting,17(5/6), 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacorogna M., Gençay R., Müller U., Pictet O. (2001), “Effective Return, Risk Aversion and Drawdowns”, Physica, A 289, 229–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel K., Grinblatt M., Titman S., Wermers R. (1997), “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristics-based Benchmarks”, Journal of Finance, 52(3), July, 1035–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bodt E., Grégoire Ph., Cottrell M. (1997), “Projection of Long-term Interest Rates with Maps”, in Deboeck G., Kohonen T. (eds), Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps, Springer, 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deboeck G. (1997), “Picking Mutual Funds with Self-organizing Maps”, in Deboeck G., Kohonen T. (eds) Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps, Springer, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRoon F., Nijman T., Terhost J. (2001), “Evaluating Style Analysis”, in Proceedings ofEFMA’01 Conference, Lugano, June, 33 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibartomoleo D., Witkowski E. (1997), “Mutual Fund Misclassification: Evidence based on Style Analysis”, Financial Analysts Journal, Sept-Oct, 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung W., Hsieh D. (1997), “Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds”, Review of Financial Studies, 10(2), Summer, 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung W., Hsieh D. (1998), “Performance Attribution and Style Analysis. From Mutual Funds to Hedge Funds”, Working paper, Paradigm Financial Product, February, 41 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung W., Hsieh D. (1999), “A Primer on Hedge Funds”, Journal of Empirical Finance,6(3), 309331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung W., Hsieh D. (2000), “Performance Characteristics of Hedge Funds and Commodity Funds: Natural versus Spurious Biases”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung W., Hsieh D. (2001), “The Risk in Hedge Fund Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Trend Followers”, Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), Summer, 313–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt M., Titman S. (1989), “Portfolio Performance Evaluation: Old Issues and New Insights”, Review of Financial Studies, 2 (3), 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber M. (2001), “Identying the Risk Structure of Mutual Fund Returns”, European Financial Management, 7 (2), June 2001, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964”, Journal of Finance, 23, May, 389–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobson J., Korkie B. (1981), “Performance Hypothesis and Testing and with the Sharpe and Treynor Measures”, Journal of Finance, 36, September, 889–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen T. (2001), Self-organizing Maps, Springer Series in Information Sciences, XXX, 3rd extended edition, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland H. (1999), “Beyond Mean-variance: Performance Measurement in a Nonsymmetric World”, Financial Analysts Journal, January-February, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhabitant F.-S. (2001), “Assessing Market Risk for Hedge Funds and Hedge Funds Portfolios”, FAME Research Paper n°24, March, 40 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantegna R. (1999), “Information and Hierachical Structure in Financial Markets”, Computer Physics Comunications, 121–122, 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitev T. (1998), “Classification of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs) using Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis”, Journal of Alternative Investments, 1(2), Fall, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R., Gehr A. (1978), “Sample Bias and Sharpe’s Performance Measure: A Note” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13, December, 943–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Okunev J. (1990), “An Alternative Measure of Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,17(2), Spring, 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen Ch., Satchel’ S. (2000), “Small Sample Analysis of Performance Measures in the Asymmetric Response Model”, Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, 35(3), September, 425–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business, 34(1), Part 1, January, 119138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1988), “Determining a Fund’s Effective Asset Mix”, Investment Management Review, 2 (6), 1988, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1992), “Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement” Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(2), 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe W. (1994), “The Sharpe Ratio”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sortino F., Price L. (1994), “Performance Measurement in a Downside Risk Framework” Journal of Investing, Fall, 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Treynor J. (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds”, Harvard Business Review, January-February, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Maillet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maillet, B., Rousset, P. (2003). Classifying hedge funds with Kohonen maps: A first attempt. In: Lesage, C., Cottrell, M. (eds) Connectionist Approaches in Economics and Management Sciences. Advances in Computational Management Science, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3722-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3722-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-5379-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3722-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics