Skip to main content

Physical, Sexual, and Psychological Effects of Male Infant Circumcision

A New Preputial Structure

  • Chapter
Understanding Circumcision

Abstract

Circumcised and genitally intact men, as well as female and gay partners having sexual experience with both circumcised and intact men, were surveyed in order to investigate the long-term effects of infant circumcision. Both circumcised men and the sexual partners of circumcised men reported a number of adverse physical, sexual, and psychological sequelae. Logistic regression analysis revealed that circumcised men could be reliably classified as having penile scarring, need for use of lubrication when undertaking sexual activity, reluctance to use condoms, progressive decline in sexual sensitivity, as well as unhappiness with and reluctance to think about their circumcision status. Female and gay sexual partners reported that their circumcised partners were more likely to experience reduced sexual sensation as compared with their intact partners, as well as dissatisfaction with their orgasms and a wide range of negative emotions associated with being circumcised. Evidently, there are many adverse physical, sexual and psychological effects from infant circumcision, which need to be acknowledged in any discussions pertaining to informed consent in relation to circumcision surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Maguire P, Parkes CM. Surgery and loss of body parts. BMJ 1998;316:1086–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997. pp. 125–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Menage J. Circumcision and psychological harm; 1998. [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.norm-uk.co.uk/psycheff.htm

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5, [here, p. 294.]

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harryman GL. What is lost? [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.SexuallyMutilatedChild.org/lost.htm

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harryman GL. What is lost? [cited 1 September 1999]. URL:http://www.SexuallyMutilatedChild.org/lost.htm

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson KN, Anderson LE, Glanze WD, editors. Mosby’s Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Dictionary. Missouri: Mosby Publishers; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson KN, Anderson LE, Glanze WD, editors. Mosby’s Medical, Nursing, and Allied Health Dictionary. Missouri: Mosby Publishers; 1994. p. 1271.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fleiss Paul M. The case against circumcision. Mothering (Winter 1997): pp. 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:34–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gearhart JP. Complications of pediatric circumcision. In: Marshall FF, editor. Urologic Complications: Medical and Surgical, Adult and Pediatric. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1986. pp. 387–96.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Van Howe RS. Variability in penile appearance and penile findings. BJU 1997;80:776–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Richters J, Gerofi J, Donovan B. Are condoms the right size(s)? A method for self-measurement of the erect penis. Venereology 1995;8:77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual mutilations: A human tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. Journal of Sex Research 1983;19:289–92, [here, p. 291.]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Goldman R. Circumcision: The hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997. p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marx JL. Circumcision may protect against the AIDS virus. Science 1989;245:470–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fleiss PM, Hodges F. Nontherapeutic circumcision should not be performed. Amer Med News 1995;38:16.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Van Howe RS. Circumcision and HIV infection: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Int J STD & AIDS 1999;10:8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!(2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ritter T. Say No to Circumcision! Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ. The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. Br J Urol 1996;77:291–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol 1998;159:367–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A biocultural analysis of circumcision. Soc Biol 1998;44:265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kandel ER. Cellular mechanisms of learning and the biological basis of individuality. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, editors. Principles of neural science 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier Publishers; 1991. pp. 1009–31.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kaas JK. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Ann Rev Neuroscience 1991;14:137–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Immerman RS, Mackey WC. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization. J Genet Psychol 1998;159:367–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hughes GK. Circumcision: another look. Ohio Med 1990;86:92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hughes GK. Circumcision: another look. Ohio Med 1990;86:92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kaas JK. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Ann Rev Neuroscience 1991;14:137–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman MA. Circumcision in the United States: prevalence, prophylactic effects, and sexual practice. JAMA 1997;277:1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Money J, Davison J. Adult penile circumcision: erotosexual and cosmetic sequelae. J Sex Res 1983;19:289–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Stinson J. Impotence and adult circumcision. J Natl Med Assoc 1973;65:161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Van Howe RS, Cold CJ. Advantages and disadvantages of neonatal circumcision. JAMA 1997;278:203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. O’Hara K, O’Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on sexual enjoyment of female partner. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human Sexual Response. Boston: Little Brown Publishers; 1966. p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cansever G. Psychological effects of circumcision. Br J Med Psychol 1965;38:321–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Schlossberger N, Turne R, Irwin C. Early adolescent knowledge and attitudes about circumcision: methods and implications for research. J Adolesc Health 1992;13:293–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising!(2nd edition). Aptos, CA: Hourglass Publishers; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Anand K, Hickey P. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1321–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  87. Prescott J. Genital pain vs. genital pleasure: Why the one and not the other? Truth Seeker 1989;July/August:15.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Richards M, Bernal J, Brackbill Y. Early behavioral differences: gender or circumcision? Dev Psychobiol 1976;9:275–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Goldman R. Circumcision: the hidden trauma. Boston: Vanguard Publishers; 1997. p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Goldman R. Psychological impact of circumcision. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:93–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Hammond T. Long-term consequences of neonatal circumcision. In: Denniston GC, Milos MF, editors. Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Menage J. Circumcision and psychological harm; 1998. [cited 1 September 19991 URL:http://www.norm-uk.co.uk/psycheff.htm

    Google Scholar 

  94. Van Howe RS, Svoboda JS, Dwyer JG, Price CP. Involuntary circumcision: the legal issues. BJU Int 1999;83, Suppl 1:63–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Menage J. Post-traumatic stress disorder after genital medical procedures. In: Denniston GC, Hodges FM, Milos MF, editors. Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. pp. 215–9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  96. Maguire P, Parkes CM. Surgery and loss of body parts. BMJ 1998;316:1086–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Boyle GJ, Langley PD. Elementary Statistical Methods: For Students of Psychology, Education, Social Sciences. Sydney: Pergamon Publishers; 1989. pp. 164–8.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hammond T. Preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood. BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bensley, G.A., Boyle, G.J. (2001). Physical, Sexual, and Psychological Effects of Male Infant Circumcision. In: Denniston, G.C., Hodges, F.M., Milos, M.F. (eds) Understanding Circumcision. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3351-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3375-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-3351-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics