Skip to main content
  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

Measurement and instrumentation are often viewed as minor considerations in the broader picture of research design, but they can be crucial to your project’s potential success. The quality of your research will depend on the quality of the data you collect, which, in turn, will depend on the psychometric properties of the measures you use. Many prospective applicants have struggled with issues concerning measurement and instrumentation. You may have confronted problems as you searched for available measures and tried to decide which ones were appropriate for your population. You may also have concluded that none of them were appropriate or could be adapted for your study and decided to design measures of your own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Freeman, C., Tyrer, P. 1989. Research Methods in Psychiatry: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Gaskell, The Royal College of Psychiatrists ( Distributed in North America by American Psychiatric Press, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

  • Bums, O. C., ed. 1972. The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. Highland Park,NJ: Gryphon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K., Fischer, J. 1987. Measures for Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang K. H. C., Watters, J. K., Case, P. 1988. Psychological assessment and AIDS research with intravenous drug users: Challenges in measurement. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 20: 191–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, L., Kozarenic, D., Sartorius, N. 1984. Source Book of Geriatric Assessment Volume I: Evaluations in Gerontology. New York: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, L., Kozarenic, D., Sartorius, N. 1984. Source Book of Geriatric Assessment Volume 2: Review of Analyzed Instruments. New York: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettieri, D. J., Nelson, J. E., Sayers, M. A., eds. 1985. NIAAA Treatment Handbook Series 2: Alcoholism Treatment Assessment Research Instruments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsella, A. J., Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Ratz, M. M., eds. 1987. The Measurement of Depression. New York: Guilford Press. Rabkin, J. G. 1994. Self-rating scales for depression: Description and critique. Review prepared for the NIMH Depression Awareness, Treatment Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riezen, H., Segal, M. 1988. Comparative Evaluations of Rating Scales for Clinical Psychopharmacology. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Remien, R. (1995). Instrumentation Off the Shelf or on Your Own. In: Pequegnat, W., Stover, E. (eds) How to Write a Successful Research Grant Application. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2393-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2393-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44965-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2393-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics