Abstract
In the last decade, dynamical system theory has provided several tools to analyse quantitatively the transition to low dimensional chaos1 observed in many experiments2. In contrast a general characterization of spatiotemporal chaos is still an unsolved problem, that has recently received a lot of interest both from a theoretical 3–10 and experimental point of view11–13. In fluid dynamics the main goal of this research is to understand the relationship between chaos and the turbulent regimes, where the fluid motion presents a chaotic evolution both in space and time. Indeed in spatially extended systems, such as a fluid, the transition to low dimensional chaos is associated with relevant spatial effects, but the unpredictable time evolution does not influence the spatial order. In other words the correlation length is comparable with the size of the system. So, in order to give more insight into the problem of the transition to turbulence it is very important to study the role of the spatial degrees of freedom in temporal chaotic regimes and the reasons why the spatial coherence is lost. The simplest mathematical models, in which the features of the transition to spatiotemporal chaos may be analysed, are systems of coupled maps4–6, one dimensional partial differential equations3,6,7,8 and cellular automata9. One of the typical regimes, presented by these models, is spatiotemporal intermittency,that consists of a fluctuating mixture of laminar and turbulent domains with well defined boundaries. Such a phenomenon has a physical relevance because it is similar to those observed in Rayleigh-Benard convection 13,14 and in boundary layer flows 15
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
For a general review of low dimensional chaos see for example: J. P. Eckmann, D. Ruelle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 1987;
P. Berge, Y. Pomeau, Ch. Vidal, L’Ordre dans le Chaos ( Hermann, Paris 1984 ).
A. Libchaber, C. Laroche, S. Fauve, J. Physique Lett. 43, 221, (1982);
M. Giglio, S. Musazzi, U. Perini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2402 (1984);
M. Dubois, M. Rubio, P. Berge’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1446 (1983);
S. Ciliberto, J. P. Gollub, J. Fluid Mech. 158, 381 (1984).
B. Nicolaenko, in “ The Physics of Chaos and System Far From Equilibrium”, M. Duong-van and B. Nicolaenko, eds. ( Nuclear Physics B, proceeding supplement 1988 );
A. R. Bishop, K. Fesser, P. S. lomdhal, W. C. Kerr, M. B. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1095 (1983).
G. L. Oppo, R. Kapral Phys. Rev. A 3, 4219 (1986).
K. Kaneko, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74, 1033 (1985);
J. Crutchfield K. Kaneko in. Kaneko in “Direction in Chaos”, B. L. Hao (World Scientific Singapore 1987 );
K. Kaneko Physica 34D, 1 (1989);
R. Lima, Bunimovich preprint.
H. Chate’, P. Manneville, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 112 (1987);
Europhysics Letters 6,591(1988);
Physica D 32, 409 (1988)
H. Chate’, B. Nicolaenko, to be published in the proceedings of the conference: “New trends in nonlinear dynamics and pattern forming phenomena”, Cargese 1988;
Y. Pomeau, A. Pumir and P. Pelce’, J. Stat. Phys. 37, 39 (1984)
F. Bagnoli, S. Ciliberto, A. Francescato, R. Livi, S. Ruffo, in “Chaos and complexity”, M. Buiatti, S. Ciliberto, R. Livi, S. Ruffo eds., ( World Scientific Singapore 1988 );
F. Bagnoli, S. Ciliberto, R. Livi, S. Ruffo, in the proceedings of the school on Cellular Automata, Les Houches (1989).
P. Coullett and P. Procaccia in these proceedings.
A. Politi these proceedings.
P. Kolodner, A. Passner, C. M. Surko, R. W. Walden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2621 (1986);
S. Ciliberto, M. A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 25 (1987);
A. Pocheau Jour. de Phys. 49, 1127 (1988)I;
I. Rehberg, S. Rasenat, J. Finberg, L. de la Torre Juarez Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2449 (1988);
N. B. Trufillaro, R. Ramshankar, J. P. Gollub Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 422 (1989).
P. Berge’, in “ The Physics of Chaos and System Far From Equilibrium”, M.Duong-van and B. Nicolaenko, eds. ( Nuclear Physics B, proceedings supplement 1988 );
F. Daviaud, M. Dubois, P. Berg Europhysics Lett. 9, 441 (1989).
S.Ciliberto,P.Bigazzi,Phys.Rev.Lett. 60, 286 (1988).
M. Van Dyke, An Album of Fluid Motion (Parabolic Press, Stanford, 1982 );
D. J. Tritton, Physical Fluid Dynamics (Van Nostrand Reinold, New York, 1979), Chaps.19–22.
S. Chandrasekar, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability, Clarendon Press,. Oxford 1961;
F. H. Busse, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41 (1978) 1929;
Ch. Normand, Y. Pomeau, M. Velarde Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 581, (1977).
W. Merzkirch, Flow Visualisation, Academic Press, New York 1974.
S. Ciliberto, F. Francini,F. Simonelli, Opt. Commun. 54, 381 (1985).
S. Ciliberto, M. Caponeri, F. Bagnoli, submitted to Nuovo Cimento D.
S.Ciliberto,B.Nicolaenko submitted for publication;
A.Newell, D. Rand, D. Russell, Physica 33d, 281 (1988).
H. Muller-Krumbhaar in ‘Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics“, edited by K. Binder (Springer- Verlag,New York 1979 );
D. R. Nelson,’Phase transitions and critical phenomena’, edited by C. Domb and J.L. Lebowitz (Academic Press London 1983 ).
R. Livi, M. Pettini, S. Ruffo, M. Sparpaglione, A. Vulpiani, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1039 (1985);
M. A. Rubio, P. Bigazzi, L. Albavetti, S. Ciliberto. J. Fluid Mech. to be published.
P. C. Hohenberg, B. I. Shraiman,preprint.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ciliberto, S. (1989). Characterizing Space-Time Chaos in an Experiment of Thermal Convection. In: Abraham, N.B., Albano, A.M., Passamante, A., Rapp, P.E. (eds) Measures of Complexity and Chaos. NATO ASI Series, vol 208. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0623-9_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0623-9_61
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-0625-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-0623-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive