Abstract
In 1972 Martin Seligman and Joanne Hager published a collection of readings along with their comments entitled Biological Boundaries of Learning (Seligman & Hager, 1972). In this work Seligman and Hager seek to accomplish two things. First, they question the widely held assumption that learning principles derived in the laboratory are equally valid across species and are unaffected by the particular stimulus, response, or reinforcer under investigation. Second, they offer an alternative hypothesis (“preparedness”) to explain much of the data that seemed at odds with traditional learning theory. In support of their position, Seligman and Hager assert that “animals, man included, learn some things easily, others only painstakingly, and still others not at all” (p. 463), and they propose that these differences have a biological basis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Recommended Reading
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & McClearn, G. E. (1980). Behavioral genetics: A primer. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollandsworth, J.G. (1986). Nature and Nurture. In: Physiology and Behavior Therapy. The Plenum Series in Behavioral Psychophysiology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7023-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7023-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7025-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7023-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive