Abstract
Given the initial body of information described in the previous chapter, the reader may be more convinced that there is some support for the “pursuit of uniqueness.” However, there are further refinements of the theory that need to be considered at this juncture. In the experiments mentioned in the previous chapter, the reader should note that the research participants were given similarity feedback relative to some other stranger or strangers. In each case, however, the research participants were given a minimal amount of information other than similarity about the “other person(s).” Suppose that you are given additional value-laden information about another person? Maybe you are told that a person is an “ex-con,” insane, or brilliant. Perhaps the “other” person is a member of a group that you hold in esteem, such as your sorority, fraternity, lodge, club, or organization. Maybe the “other” person is a member of some other organization or group that you do not like. What predictions does the uniqueness model make about your emotional behavioral reactions under these circumstances? The present chapter addresses these questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, H.S. Outsiders. New York: Free Press, 1963.
Billig, M. G. Categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. Unpublished paper, Bristol University, 1971.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). Group dynamics: Research and theory (2nd ed.). Evanston, 111.: Row & Peterson, 1960.
Cooper, J., & Jones, E. E. Opinion divergence as a strategy to avoid being miscast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 23–30.
Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 1954, 7, 117–140.
Fishman, J. A. Language and rationalism: Two integrative essays. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1972.
Fromkin, H. L. The psychology of uniqueness: Avoidance of similarity and seeking of differentness. Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences. Paper No. 438, Purdue University, 1973.
Fromkin, H. L., & Sherwood, J. J. (Eds.). Integrating the organization: A social psychological analysis. New York: Free Press, 1974.
Hakmiller, K. L. Need for self-evaluation, perceived similarity, and comparison choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, Supplement # 1, 49–54.
Hollander, E. P. Conformity, status, and idiosyncracy credit. Psychological Review, 1958, 65, 117–127.
Hyman, H. H. The psychology of status. Archives of Psychology, 1942, No. 269.
Hyman, H. H. Reflections on reference groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960, 24, 383–396.
Kelley, H. H. Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (rev. ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1952, pp. 410–415.
Lemaine, G. Social differentiation and social conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 17–52.
Lerner, M. J. On the just world. In A. Pepitone (Chm.), Social psychology of freedom, justice and responsibility. Symposium presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1969.
Lerner, M. J., & Agar, E. The consequences of perceived similarity: Attraction and rejection, approach and avoidance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1972, 6, 69–75.
Merton, R. K. Social theory and social structure (rev. ed.). Glencoe, 111.: Free Press, 1957.
Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 269–277.
Schachter, S. Deviation, rejection, communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 190–207.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1961.
Sherwood, J. J. Self actualization and self identity theory. Personality: An International Journal, 1970, 7, 41–63.
Simmel, G. Conflict and the web of group affiliations (trans, by R. Bendix). Glencoe, 111.: Free Press, 1955.
Simmons, J. L. Deviants. Berkeley, Calif.: Glendessary Press, 1969.
Tajfel, H. La categorisation sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction a la psychologie sociale. Paris: Larousse, 1972, pp. 272–302.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 1, 149–178.
Taylor, S. E., & Mettee, D. R. When similarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 75–81.
Thornton, D. A., & Arrowood, A. J. Self evaluation, self enhancement, and the locus of social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Supplement, 1966, 1, 40–48.
Wheeler, L. Motivation as a determination of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Supplement, 1966, 1, 27–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Snyder, C.R., Fromkin, H.L. (1980). Corollaries of Uniqueness Theory: The Nature of the Comparison Other Persons. In: Uniqueness. Perspectives in Social Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3659-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-3659-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-3661-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-3659-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive