Skip to main content

Monitoring vs. Man-in-the-Loop Detection of Aircraft Control Failures

  • Chapter
Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures

Part of the book series: NATO Conference Series ((HF,volume 15))

Abstract

The rapid technological advancements of the past decade, and the availability of higher levels of automation which resulted, have aroused interest in the role of man in complex systems. Should the human be an active element in the control loop, operating manual manipulators in response to signals presented by various instruments and displays? Or should the signals be coupled directly into an automatic controller, delegating the human to the monitoring role of a supervisor of the system’s operation?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, I.D., 1964, “The Measurement of Preceptual Load and Reserve Capacity, Trans. Assoc. Ind. Med. Off.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, C.S., Whitaker, H.P. and Young, L.R., 1964, “The Roles of Man and Instruments in Control and Guidance Systems for Aircraft”, Proc. of 15th Intl. Astro. Congress, Warsaw, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ephrath, A.R. and Curry, R.E., 1977, “Detection by Pilots of System Failures During Instrument Landings”, IEEE Trans. on SMC, 7:841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyker, D.A., Stackhouse, S.P., Khalafalla, A.S. and McLane, R.C., 1971, “Development of techniques for Measuring Pilot Workload”, NASA CR-1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waiden, R.S. and Rouse, W.B., 1978, “A Queueing Model of Pilot Decision-Making in a Multi-Task Flight-Management Situation”, IEEE Trans, on SMC, 8:867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wempe, T.E., 1974, “Flight Management — Pilot Procedures and System Interfaces for the 1980–1990’s”, Proc. AIAA Conf. on Life Sciences and Systems, AIAA-74–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, D.C. and C. Kessel, 1979, “The Effects of Participatory Mode and Task Workload on the Detection of Dynamic System Failures”, IEEE Trans. on SMC, 9:24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L.R., 1969, “On Adaptive Manual Control”, Ergonomics, 12:635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L.R. and Tada, A., 1980, “The Role of Hand Movement Information in Subjective Detection of Controlled Element Dynamics Change in Adaptive Manual Control” (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ephrath, A.R., Young, L.R. (1981). Monitoring vs. Man-in-the-Loop Detection of Aircraft Control Failures. In: Rasmussen, J., Rouse, W.B. (eds) Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures. NATO Conference Series, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-9232-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-9230-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics