Skip to main content

Abstract

The 1970s and the early 1980s have witnessed the politicization of the American family. Conservatives and liberals alike have couched political agendas in a family rhetoric. Concurrently with this war with words, with advocates on both sides of the political spectrum invoking such goals as family welfare, stability, and sanctity, it is fair to say that the well-being of families, especially their economic well-being, has steadily declined. This chapter seeks to move beyond rhetoric to an examination of the interplay between public policies and families in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldous, J. The intermingling of governmental policy, social structure, and public values: The case of changing family. In N. J. Demerath, O. Larsen, & K. F. Schuessler (Eds.), Social policy and sociology. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, J. Family careers: Developmental changes in families. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, J., & Dumon, W. (Eds.). The politics and programs of family policy: United States and European perspective. Notre Dame, Ind.: Center for the Study of Man, University of Notre Dame and Leuvan Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, CM. Defining the family for post-industrial public policy. In D. P. Snyder (Ed.), The family in post-industrial America: Some fundamentals for public policy development. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, S.J. The effect of welfare on marital stability and remarriage. In G. McDonald & F. I. Nye (Eds.), Family policy. Minneapolis, Minn.: National Council on Family Relations, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, S.J. Welfare and marital dissolution: A reply. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1981, 43 ,302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M. J. Here to stay. New York: Basic Books, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M. J. Toward a description and evaluation of United States family policy. In J. Aldous & W. Dumon (Eds.), The politics and programs of family policy. Notre Dame, Ind.: Center for the Study of Man, University of Notre Dame and Leuvan Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. S. Should every job support a family? Public Interest ,1975,40 ,109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohen, H. H., & Viveros-Long, A. Balancing jobs and family life: Do flexible work schedules help Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Weiss, H. Beyond policies without people: An ecological perspective on child and family policy. In E. Zigler, S. L. Kager, & E. Klugman (Eds.), Children, families and government: Perspectives on American social policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. A. Social science and the formulation of policy toward children. In H. C. Wallach (Ed.), Approaches to child and family policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. W. A social history of the American family: From colonial times to the present (3 vols.). New York: Barnes & Noble, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, G. The family as support system. In G. Caplan & M. Killilea (Eds.), Support systems and mutal help. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. Social research and national policy: What gets used, by whom, for what purposes and with what effects?’’ International Social Science Journal ,1976, 28 ,187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. Family policy: The conservative challenge and the progressive response. Journal of Family Issues ,1983, 4(3), 427–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. As the twig is bent-asting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F. L. Who shall be helped? Public support for social services. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R. Recommendations for a Head Start program by a panel of experts. Washington, D.C.: Office of Economic Opportunity, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. Social organization. New York: Scribner, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, B., Royce, J. M., Snipper, A. S., Murray, H. W., & Lazar, I. Preschool programs and later school competence of children from low-income families. Science ,1980, 208 ,202–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. Unemployment and the “dual labor market.” The Public Interest ,1975, 2(38), 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. Social science and advocacy: A case study. American Behavioral Scientist ,1982, 26 ,199–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, T. W. On the relationship between welfare and marital stability: A research note. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1981,43 ,293 – 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Coe, R. D., & Hill, M. S. Poverty. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, 1981. (Mimeograph)

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, J. Family matters. Harvard Educational Review ,1979,49 ,20–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. Work experience and family life. In J. O’Toole (Ed.),Work and the quality of life: Resource papers for work in America. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. Unplanned parenthood: The social consequences of teenage childbearing. New York: Free Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giele, J. Z. Social policy and the family. Annual Review of Sociology ,1979, 5 ,275-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. Children of divorced parents in demographic perspective. Journal of Social Issues ,1979, 35, 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. C., & Spanier, G. B. Married and unmarried cohabitation in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1980,42, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. The theory of measurement of family change. In E. B. Sheldon & W. E. Moore (Eds.), Indicators of social change: Concepts and measurements. New York: Russell Sage, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L.Do the poor want to work Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L. Limitations of the Seattle and Denver income maintenance analysis. American Journal of Sociology ,1979, 85 ,653–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L. Causes and cures of welfare: New evidence on the social psychology of the poor. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, L., & Moen, P. The evolution and implementation of family welfare policy. Policy Studies Journal ,1980, 80 ,633–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grad, S. Income of the population aged 60 and older, 1971 (Staff Papers No. 26). Washington, D.C.: Office of Research and Statistics, Social Security Administration, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. G., & Blake, G. P. How restrictive rental practices affect families. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotberg, E. The federal role in family policies. In H. C. Wallach (Ed.), Approaches to child and family policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Tuma, N. B., & Groenveld, L. P. Income and independence effects on marital dissolution. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 84 ,611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriot, P. J. Political aspects of social indicators: Implications for research. Social Science Frontiers (No. 4). New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. Families under stress. New York: Harper & Row, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. Status of research on families (Chap. 8). Rockville, Md.: NIMH, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, R. The family impact seminar: A new approach to policy analysis. In W. C. Wallach (Ed.), Approaches to child and family policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., & Oorns, T. Is government helping or hurting families. Pennys Forum ,1979 (Spring, Summer), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee of the Congress of the United States. Special study on economic change: Vol. 1. Human resources and demographics: Characteristics of people and policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee of the Congress of the United States. Special study on economic change, social security and pensions: Programs of equity and security. A staff study. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. Parenting in an unresponsive society: Managing work and family life. New York: Free Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A.J. Family policy: Government and families in fourteen countries. New York: Columbia University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S., & Kahn, A. J. Child care, family benefits and working parents: A study in comparative policy. New York: Columbia University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G. The human factor in economic affairs. In A. Campbell, & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. Carnegie Council on Children. All our children: The American family under pressure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I. Social research and social policy-Reflections on relationships. In R. Hoskins & J. J. Gallagher (Eds.), Care and education of young children in America: Policy, politics, and social science. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, I., & Darlington, R. Lasting effects of early education: A report from the Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development ,1982, 47, 2–31 (Serial No. 195).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, C., & Bednorzik, R. A profile of women on part-time schedules. Monthly Labor Review ,1978, 101(10), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan, S. A., & Belous, R. S. Working wives and mothers: What happens to family life. Monthly Labor Review ,1981, 104 ,26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, A.J. Language games, social science, and public policy: The case of the family. In H. C. Wallach (Ed.) Approaches to Child and Family Policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. E. Fiscal and organizational constraints on United States family policy. In J. Aldous & W. Dumon (Eds.), The Politics and Programs of Family Policy. Notre Dame, Ind.: Center for the Study of Man, University of Notre Dame and Leuvan Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M., & Sawhill, I. V. Welfare policy and the family. Public Policy ,1978,25, 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maklan, D.M. The four-day workweek: Blue collar adjustment to a nonconventional arrangement of work and leisure time. New York: Praeger, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., Colten, M. E., Groves, R. M., & Thomas, B. Measuring restrictive rental practices affecting families with children: A national survey. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masnick, G., & Bane, M. J. The nation’s families. Boston: Auburn, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCathren, R. R. The demise of federal categorical child care legislation: Lessons for the ’80s from the failures of the ’70s. In H. C. Wallach (Ed.), Approaches to child and family policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G., & Nye, F. I. (Eds.). Family policy. Minneapolis: National Council on Family Relations, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. R. Changing work life patterns: A twenty-five year review. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science ,1978, 435 ,83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. Family impacts of the 1975 recession: Duration of unemployment. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1979, 41 ,561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. Developing family indicators: Financial hardship, A case in point. Journal of Family Issues ,1980, 1 ,5–30. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. Measuring unemployment: Family considerations. Human Relations ,1980, 33(3), 183–192. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. Unemployment, public policy, and families: Forecasts for the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family ,1983, 45 ,751–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P. Continuities and discontinuities in women’s labor force activity. In G. H. Elder, Jr. (Ed.), Life course dynamics: 1960s to 1980s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., Kain, E. L. ,& Elder, G. H., Jr., Economic conditions and family life: Contemporary and historical perspectives. In R. Nelson & F. Skidmore (Eds.), American families and the economy: The high costs of living. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. A. The negative income tax: Would it discourage work? Monthly Labor Review ,April 1981, pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney, R. M. Families, social services and social policy: The issue of shared responsibility. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, A. Nation and family: The Swedish experiment in democratic family and population policy. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. Beyond the welfare state. London: Methuen, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences and the Social Science Research Council. The behavioral and social sciences, outlook and needs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences and the Social Science Research Council. Toward a national policy for children and families. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, M. G., & Leik, R. L. A general framework for family analysis. In D. Olson & B. C. Miller (Eds.), Family studies review yearbook (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. Work, well-being and family life. In J. O’Toole (Ed.), Work and the quality of life. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. Welfare and working mothers. Family policy note 6. Joint Center for Urban Studies of M.I.T. and Harvard University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M. Notes for the study of tacit family policy. Family policy note 1. Cambridge: Joint Center for Urban Studies, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & Rainwater, L. The welfare class and welfare reform. Family policy note 4. Cambridge: Joint Center for Urban Studies of the M.I.T. and Harvard University, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. M. American family policy: Content and context. New York: Family Service Association of America, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. M. Exploring American family policy. Marriage and Family Review ,1979, 2 ,3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, A. M. Systematic thinking for social action. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, A. A. Family policy in the United States. International Social Science Journal ,1962,14 ,452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, A. A. Explorations in social policy. New York: Basic Books, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, A. A.Testimony before welfare reform subcommittee,House of Representatives on H.R. 9030, 1977. (Mimeograph)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schorr, A. A. Thy Father and Thy Mother. A Second Look at Filial Responsibility and Family Policy. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. On relief: The economics of poverty and public welfare. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, B. Social security and pensions in transition. New York: Free Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. Y. Looking for family policy-Big tickets on moral judgments. In J. Aldous & W. Dumon (Eds.), The politics and programs of family policy. Notre Dame, Ind.: Center for the Study of Man, University of Notre Dame and Leuvan Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G. Y. The futility of family policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, A., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. Research memorandum on the family in the depression (Bulletin 29). New York: Social Research Council, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, D., Martin, G. T., & Gordon, L. K. The welfare industry: Functionaries and recipients in public aid. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B. Family systems in the 1970’s: Analysis, policies and programs. The Annals of the American Academy ,1971, 396 ,40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Social Indicators III. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Characteristics of state plans for aid to families with dependent children. Washington, D.C.: Social Security Administration, Office of Family Assistance, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Perspective on working women: A databook. (Bulletin 2080). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor News ,February 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanGorkum, J. W. Social security revisited, Studies in social security and retirement policy. Washington, D.C: American Enterprise Institute for Policy Research, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H. C. Conclusion. In H. C. Wallach (Ed.), Approaches to child and family policy. Boulder, Colo. Westview Press (AAAS), 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westinghouse Learning Corporation. The impact of Head Start on children’s cognitive and affective development, executive summary. Ohio Report to the Office of Economic Opportunity (EDO S6321). Washington, D.C.: Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., Kagen, S. L., & Klugman, E. Children, families and government: Perspectives on American social policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moen, P., Schorr, A.L. (1987). Families and Social Policy. In: Sussman, M.B., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Handbook of Marriage and the Family. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7151-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7151-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4615-7153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-7151-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics